<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GChron</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geochronology</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GChron</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geochronology</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2628-3719</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gchron-7-459-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Carbonate <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U problems and potential <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U fixes</article-title><alt-title>Carbonate U–Pb problems and fixes</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vermeesch</surname><given-names>Pieter</given-names></name>
          <email>p.vermeesch@ucl.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3404-1209</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>McLean</surname><given-names>Noah</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0388-1862</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Vaks</surname><given-names>Anton</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Golan</surname><given-names>Tzahi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Breitenbach</surname><given-names>Sebastian F. M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-2065</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Parrish</surname><given-names>Randall</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Dept. of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Dept. of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Geological Survey of Israel, 9692100 Jerusalem, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Dept. of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Dept. of Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Pieter Vermeesch (p.vermeesch@ucl.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>459</fpage><lpage>473</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Pieter Vermeesch et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025.html">This article is available from https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e205">Carbonate U–Pb dating has become a key tool for Quaternary palaeoclimatology and palaeoanthropology beyond the age limit of Th–U disequilibrium dating. U–Pb geochronology is based on the paired radioactive decay of <sup>238</sup>U to <sup>206</sup>Pb and of <sup>235</sup>U to <sup>207</sup>Pb. Current carbonate U–Pb data processing algorithms rely mostly on the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U clock and attach little weight to the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U data. A key weakness of this approach is the need to correct the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U data for initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium, which may cause an excess or (occasionally) a deficit in radiogenic <sup>206</sup>Pb compared to secular equilibrium. Uncorrected initial disequilibrium may bias <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates by up to 4 Myr. We introduce a new disequilibrium correction algorithm, using matrix exponentials. This algorithm can be used to undo the effects of U-series disequilibrium using either an assumed initial composition or a measured set of modern <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U (and optionally <sup>230</sup>Th/<sup>238</sup>U) activity ratios. Using a deterministic Bayesian inversion algorithm, we show that disequilibrium corrections work well for relatively young samples but become unreliable beyond 1.5 Ma and impossible beyond 2 Ma.  Using theoretical models and real world examples from Siberia, South Africa, and Israel, we show that the uncertainty of the disequilibrium correction of such old samples exceeds the correction itself. Previous “Monte Carlo” error propagation methods underestimate these uncertainties by up to an order of magnitude. For carbonates older than 2 Ma that likely experienced significant initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium, we recommend using the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron method instead of <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U geochronology.  <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochrons require only a small and simple correction for initial <sup>231</sup>Pa depletion. This makes <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U dating more accurate than <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U geochronology. However, the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method is no panacea. Its precision is limited by the lower abundance of <sup>207</sup>Pb compared to <sup>206</sup>Pb. In some samples, this loss of precision results in a failure to outperform the Bayesian credible intervals of the disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates. Such samples remain undatable, unless prior information is available to constrain the initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/T001518/1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Leverhulme Trust</funding-source>
<award-id>RPG-20202-334</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e691">Carbonate rocks are only a minor component of the continental crust. However, their scientific importance far outweighs their volumetric abundance. Biogenic carbonates and speleothems document the history of life and of Earth's climate and environment. To generate detailed time series of past changes from these carbonate archives, an accurate and precise chronological framework is essential. This framework is anchored in absolute time using radiometric dating methods, with two techniques commonly employed for this purpose. <sup>230</sup>Th/U dating is the method of choice for young samples whose <sup>230</sup>Th, <sup>234</sup>U, and <sup>238</sup>U activities are out of secular equilibrium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.1"/>. <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dating is the default method for older rocks, in which the secular equilibrium between <sup>230</sup>Th, <sup>234</sup>U, and <sup>238</sup>U has been restored <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e790">Ironically, the absence of detectable <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium compromises the accuracy of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method. Any initial excess or deficit of <sup>234</sup>U and <sup>230</sup>Th affects the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U ratio and, hence, the age estimate derived therefrom. In clean, detritus-free carbonates, it is often safe to assume the absence of initial <sup>230</sup>Th. This assumption is not valid for <sup>234</sup>U, which can be enriched (or occasionally depleted) relative to <sup>238</sup>U by physiochemical processes such as (1) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-recoil ejection and preferential leaching of <sup>234</sup>U from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-damaged mineral sites and (2) chemical fractionation between preferentially oxidized <sup>234</sup>U<sup>6+</sup> and <sup>238</sup>U<sup>4+</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e985">Corrections for initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium can be done either by assuming a specific initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio or by inferring the initial ratio from any measured residual <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.4"/>.  In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> of this paper, we review the second approach using matrix exponentials. We show that initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium can bias <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates by up to 4 Myr.</p>
      <p id="d2e1120">Current disequilibrium correction algorithms use a “Monte Carlo” approach to propagate the errors. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> we will show that this approach can underestimate the analytical uncertainties of <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates by an order of magnitude when samples are within a few per mil of secular equilibrium (which typically happens before ca. 2 Ma). This observation undermines the results of several published studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1154">In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> we introduce a deterministic Bayesian approach to estimate the uncertainties of disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates. We use this alternative algorithm to show that beyond ca. 2 Ma, disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates are impractically imprecise, unless highly enriched initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios can be ruled out a priori. The large uncertainty associated with the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method degrades its ability to constrain reliable chronologies for carbonates whose initial disequilibrium has expired. However, a more accurate approach is available. Following the example of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.6"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.7"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.8"/>, and others, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/> makes a case for the little-used <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U clock as a replacement for the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method.</p>
      <p id="d2e1323"><sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochrons are, essentially, immune to the effects of initial disequilibrium (apart from a minor correction for <sup>231</sup>Pa, which becomes smaller with increasing age).  In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7"/> we present examples from Siberia and Israel to show that the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method is more accurate than the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method, whilst being less precise for young samples. Both the Bayesian uncertainty estimation method and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochrons have been implemented in the <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace> toolbox for radiometric geochronology (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S8"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1443">This paper will use the following symbols and notations: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1449"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the number of atoms of <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>234</sup>U, <sup>230</sup>Th, <sup>226</sup>Ra and   <sup>206</sup>Pb, respectively;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1553"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the radioactive decay constants of <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>235</sup>U, <sup>234</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>231</sup>Pa, <sup>230</sup>Th and <sup>226</sup>Ra, respectively;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1698"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the present day <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity   ratio (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>);</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1783"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>230</sup>Th/<sup>238</sup>U and   <sup>231</sup>Pa/<sup>235</sup>U activity ratios, respectively;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1905"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the measured  <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio and its standard error,  respectively.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1973">123.456 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012 represents a(n approximate) 95 % confidence  interval, whereas 123.456(78) is a more succinct notation that  indicates a value of 123.456 with a standard error of 0.078.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Disequilibrium corrections in a nutshell</title>
      <p id="d2e1991">Even though the U–Pb decay systems consist of numerous steps (14 for the <sup>238</sup>U<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb chain and 11 for the <sup>235</sup>U<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb chain), conventional U–Pb geochronology ignores this complexity, and the method is mathematically treated as a set of simple parent–daughter pairs. This simplification is justified once a state of secular equilibrium is established between all the intermediate daughter products in the decay chains. Such secular equilibrium is practically reached after 1 to 2 Myr. As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>, any disequilibrium that might exist prior to this secular equilibrium can be used as a chronometer in its own right.</p>
      <p id="d2e2036">Initial disequilibrium of the U-decay series affects the accuracy of the U–Pb method. For example, ignoring any initial excess <sup>234</sup>U results in an overestimated <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U age, and ignoring any initial <sup>231</sup>Pa deficit results in an underestimated <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U age. Therefore, initial disequilibrium is one mechanism to produce discordant U–Pb results. Extreme <sup>234</sup>U enrichments have been observed in places such as South Africa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="altparen.9"/>), Siberia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.10"/>) and Japan (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.11"/>). Using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 value as an upper bound, the maximum effect of initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium can be approximated as follows:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M211" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.155125(83) Gyr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.12"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.1705(16) Myr<sup>−1</sup>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.82206(80) Myr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.13"/>. For old carbonates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 Ma, say), a 4 Myr bias may be inconsequential. However, for young carbonates, the relative effect of initial disequilibrium can result in order-of-magnitude levels of bias. A disequilibrium correction is needed to remove this bias.</p>
      <p id="d2e2554">If the intermediate daughter is sufficiently long lived and the sample is sufficiently young (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, say) to retain some of its disequilibrium, then the activity ratios can be back-calculated to the time of isotopic closure (assuming subsequent closed-system behaviour). This strategy applies to <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium and, for very young samples, to <sup>230</sup>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium. The complex evolution of the U-decay series was first described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.14"/> and subsequently applied to U–Pb geochronology by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.15"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.16"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.17"/>. Here we opt for an alternative formulation, using matrix exponentials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.18"/>. For example, the <sup>238</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>206</sup>Pb decay chain can be expressed in matrix form as follows:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M234" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center center center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4332(19) kyr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.19"/>, and the shortest-lived intermediate daughters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 kyr half-lives) have been omitted. The solution to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) is a so-called matrix exponential:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M239" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>expm</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center center center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        which expresses the present-day amounts of the different isotopes as a function of the initial amounts. An interesting result is obtained by setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) to estimate the activity ratio under secular equilibrium:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M243" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.000055</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3244">Note that this activity ratio is <italic>not</italic> exactly equal to unity. This is because 0.0055 % of <sup>238</sup>U is lost during <sup>234</sup>U's mean lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 354 kyr. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) can also be inverted to express the initial amounts as a function of the present-day amounts:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M248" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>expm</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center center center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3522">Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) can be used to construct a concordia diagram in the presence of disequilibrium. If measured activity ratios are used to infer the initial conditions, then the concordia line terminates where those inferred activity ratios reach unrealistic values (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). Beyond 10 or so <sup>234</sup>U half-lives, it becomes very difficult to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and it is even more difficult to quantify the analytical uncertainty of the disequilibrium correction. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> we review the current “Monte Carlo” approach to uncertainty estimation for initial disequilibrium correction, and in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> we propose an alternative “Bayesian” approach, which offers significant advantages for samples that are close to secular equilibrium.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3638">Output of the “Monte Carlo” algorithm for the  Corchia dataset of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.20"/>. <bold>(a)</bold> Tera–Wasserburg concordia diagram with disequilibrium-corrected isochron (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5804 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0086 Ma); <bold>(b)</bold> 50 representative samples from the distribution of <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio measurements; <bold>(c)</bold> the corresponding initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios; and <bold>(d)</bold> the isochron ages corresponding to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values presented in panel <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>“Monte Carlo” uncertainty estimation</title>
      <p id="d2e3765">Existing data processing software for disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U geochronology, such as <monospace>DQPB</monospace>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.21"/>, estimates the uncertainty of the disequilibrium correction by Monte Carlo simulation. Given a linear array of isotopic data in Tera–Wasserburg space (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">07</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">06</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), paired with an activity ratio measurement <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with standard error <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this approach works as follows: <list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1.</label>
      <p id="d2e3878">Draw a random value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from a normal   distribution with mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>2.</label>
      <p id="d2e3941">Fit a straight line to the U–Pb data and find the  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value and isochron age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that are consistent with both the U–Pb measurements and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In other words, use  Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and repeat this for different values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> until the linear fit to the U–Pb data is optimized.</p></list-item><list-item><label>3.</label>
      <p id="d2e4038">Repeat steps (1) and (2) until the entire distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values has been sampled.</p></list-item><list-item><label>4.</label>
      <p id="d2e4061">If step (2) fails or produces physically impossible results (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), then ignore the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. Otherwise add the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values to a list of acceptable results.</p></list-item><list-item><label>5.</label>
      <p id="d2e4124">Use the spread of the acceptable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values to quantify their respective uncertainties.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e4153">For the purpose of the present study, we have implemented our own version of this algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.22"/>, using <monospace>R</monospace> and <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.23"/>. The only major difference between our code and <monospace>DQPB</monospace> is that it does not sample the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution randomly but uses a targeted approach to sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a sequence of regularly spaced normal quantiles. This is faster and produces deterministic results that do not depend on the seed of a random number generator. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> summarizes the application of this approach using the “Corchia” dataset of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.24"/>, producing identical results to <monospace>DQPB</monospace>. To reflect this equivalence of outcomes, we will refer to our version of the algorithm as a “Monte Carlo” method, despite the fact that it does not actually use a random number generator.</p>
      <p id="d2e4218">Next, let us apply the same approach to older materials such as sample AV03 (Bolt's Farm, South Africa) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.25"/>. The uncorrected U–Pb isochron age for this sample is 5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 Ma, which is 22 half-lives of <sup>234</sup>U. Consequently, the measured present-day <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio is statistically indistinguishable from secular equilibrium, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0046 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0063. Despite the lack of measurable disequilibrium, the “Monte Carlo” approach appears to have successfully applied a disequilibrium correction, resulting in a corrected age that is less than half the uncorrected age, with a precision of better than 12 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). How is this possible? The answer lies in the rejected solutions (step 4 of the algorithm), which are marked in black in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b. Ignoring these “physically impossible” initial ratios suppresses the equilibrium solutions and skews the distribution of Monte Carlo solutions towards high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c) and young ages (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>d).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4330">Output of the “Monte Carlo” algorithm for sample AV03 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.26"/>. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> are as in    Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>. The black dots in panel <bold>(b)</bold> mark synthetic replicates that are rejected because they yield physically impossible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The results shown in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are consistent with the published    values.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4386">To demonstrate that the result of Fig. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>) is wrong, let us replace the measured <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio with the equilibrium ratio (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>):

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M306" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0063</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4459">Plugging this value into the “Monte Carlo” algorithm yields an impossible result (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). It has applied a disequilibrium correction without any actual disequilibrium, by ignoring exactly half of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b). This was necessary because, for this old sample, essentially any <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value that is less than the equilibrium ratio would require a negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio or a negative isochron age <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4533">The same data as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> but replacing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the equilibrium ratio. Note that half of the synthetic replicates have been rejected (black circles). Even though there is absolutely no evidence for disequilibrium, the “Monte Carlo” produces a corrected isochron age <bold>(d)</bold> that is half the uncorrected value <bold>(a)</bold>. This    result is clearly wrong.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>A Bayesian approach</title>
      <p id="d2e4577">The previous section showed that the “Monte Carlo” algorithm produces incorrect results for samples whose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-distributions fall within, say, 3 standard errors (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from secular equilibrium. One way to address this issue is for the “Monte Carlo” algorithm to issue a warning when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is the approach taken by <monospace>DQPB</monospace>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.27"/>.  In this section we introduce an alternative approach that automatically handles problematic cases, without the need to define a nominal “applicability cutoff”. Given any values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, our new “Bayesian” algorithm proceeds as follows: <list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1.</label>
      <p id="d2e4711">Define a prior distribution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In a first  instance, we will use a uniform distribution that stretches between  a minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and a maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20. However, this uniform distribution can easily be replaced by a more informative prior. One flexible way to capture a diversity of   prior information is the logistic normal distribution:<disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M325" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the location and dispersion parameters of the distribution, respectively. An application of this informative prior will be given in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7"/>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>2.</label>
      <p id="d2e4883">Draw a random sample from the prior distribution, carry out a  constrained isochron regression, and register the resulting age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)  and corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. In other words, use  Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and repeat this for different values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> until the linear fit to the U–Pb data is optimized. Register the likelihood of this linear fit using the same algorithm as used for regular U–Pb isochron regression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.28"/>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>3.</label>
      <p id="d2e4964">Calculate the likelihood of the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values under a normal distribution with mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Combine with the likelihood of the linear fit (obtained in step 2) to produce the “posterior” probability of initial ratios.</p></list-item><list-item><label>4.</label>
      <p id="d2e5027">Repeat steps (2) and (3) to constrain the posterior distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be done either using a Markov chain or with a targeted approach of appropriately spaced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e5075">Applying this method to the 580 ka Corchia example (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) yields essentially identical results to the “Monte Carlo” algorithm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5084">The same data as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> but using the Bayesian approach. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes display the prior probability <bold>(a)</bold>, likelihood <bold>(b)</bold>, and posterior probabilities <bold>(c, d)</bold>,     respectively. For this relatively young sample, the Bayesian  method yields similar results to the “Monte Carlo” solution.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e5112">However, when the Bayesian approach is applied to the older Bolt's Farm data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>), it produces a very different result than the “Monte Carlo” approach (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The posterior distributions for Bolt's Farm sample AV03 (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c and d) still have maxima at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 Ma, just like the “Monte Carlo” distributions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c and d). But unlike the “Monte Carlo” solution, the result of the Bayesian approach also assigns a significant probability to older ages, including the uncorrected U–Pb date of 5.6 Ma. The similarity of this posterior distribution to the prior distribution reflects the fact that the measured <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio contains relatively little information. The resulting uncertainties are large but correctly reflect our ignorance about the true extent of the disequilibrium in this case.</p>
      <p id="d2e5189">Finally, changing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio to the equilibrium value (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>) produces a posterior distribution that is nearly identical to the prior distribution. This means that the likelihood function contains almost no information. In other words, the measured <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio does not tell us anything about the initial disequilibrium (except that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10). If it cannot be ruled out that the sample may have experienced extreme <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium, then it is not possible to undo the effects of this disequilibrium using the modern (measured) <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5318">Posterior distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for sample AV03 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.29"/>. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> represent    the original U–Pb data of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>, whereas panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the modified data of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>. Likelihood functions are provided in panel <bold>(b)</bold> of the latter two figures. A uniform prior was used but is not shown. The modes of the posterior distributions agree with the modes of the “Monte Carlo” solutions. However, whereas the “Monte Carlo” algorithm suggests a high degree of confidence in    the disequilibrium correction, the Bayesian approach shows that one cannot rule out a much higher age of the sample, including the uncorrected date of 5.6 Ma.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>The case against <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dating of old carbonates</title>
      <p id="d2e5411">The applicability range of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method depends on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and on the precision of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements.  Although sub-per-mil level analytical uncertainties can be routinely achieved for individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, the external reproducibility is likely worse than this in most samples. This is due to a combination of two competing factors. First, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negatively correlated with U concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.30"/>. Second, the U concentration must exhibit large variations to form a statistically robust <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron.</p>
      <p id="d2e5544">The combination of these two effects has the potential to cause intra-sample variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exceeding the analytical uncertainties. The exact magnitude of the dispersion is unknown because most speleothem U–Pb dating studies report only one or a few <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values per isochron. Here we will assume a conservative value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on a collection of 12 speleothems analysed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.31"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5616">Disequilibrium corrections using measured <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios are only feasible if those activity ratios are statistically distinguishable from secular equilibrium. To turn these conclusions into quantitative guidelines, let us define “statistically distinguishable” as “at least 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removed from secular equilibrium”. Using this definition, a sample with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 would become indistinguishable from secular equilibrium after ca. 2 Ma.  In other words, it is impossible to correct a 2 Ma sample whose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7, say. The uncorrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron age of such a sample would be 2.6 Ma, corresponding to a bias of 30 %. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> shows the outcomes of the same exercise for a range of other ages.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e5757">Sensitivity test of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method using selected ages.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">True age (Ma)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Min. resolvable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Max. bias (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">333</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5901">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> presents a more extensive exploration of the magnitude (panel a) and precision (panel b) of disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U geochronology assuming the aforementioned 2 ‰ reproducibility. Alternative versions of this diagram can be generated by modifying the reproducibility value in the <monospace>R</monospace> code provided in the Supplement of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.32"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5940">Nomogram to assess the applicability of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method in the presence of different degrees of initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> visualize the magnitude and the precision of the  disequilibrium correction, respectively, for selected values of the initial activity ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the uncorrected date, assuming secular equilibrium. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the true age, which equals the disequilibrium-corrected date using the expected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the disequilibrium-corrected dates using present-day <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ‰, respectively. The dashed line in panel <bold>(b)</bold> marks the relative uncertainty interval when no disequilibrium measurement is available, defined as the difference between corrected dates assuming initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios of 1 and 12.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e6196">Based on these considerations, we judge carbonate <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U geochronology to be unreliable beyond ca. 1.5 Ma and impossible beyond ca. 2 Ma unless initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium can be confidently ruled out (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). However, there is a solution to the conundrum of <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium. This solution is the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.33"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>A potential <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U fix to <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U's problems</title>
      <p id="d2e6366">In the previous section, we showed that the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method's accuracy is hampered by the extreme enrichment (up to double the equilibrium value or more) of <sup>234</sup>U observed in certain groundwaters (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.34"/>). This problem can be solved by avoiding <sup>234</sup>U altogether and sidestepping the <sup>238</sup>U–<sup>206</sup>Pb decay chain in favour of the <sup>235</sup>U–<sup>207</sup>Pb decay chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6455">There are two kinds of <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochrons. The simplest kind plots <sup>204</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>207</sup>Pb ratios against <sup>204</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U ratios, defining the following linear relationship:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M454" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">204</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">204</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>U</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pb</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <sup>204</sup>Pb is used as a proxy for common Pb. Alternatively, one can also use <sup>208</sup>Pb to fulfil this role. This gives rise to a <sup>208</sup>Pb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb vs. <sup>235</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>207</sup>Pb isochron, where <sup>208</sup>Pb<sub>i</sub> is the non-radiogenic <sup>208</sup>Pb component (with the decay products of <sup>232</sup>Th removed). Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) is then replaced with

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M466" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M467" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">232</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0495(25) Gyr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.36"/> and the <sup>232</sup>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>207</sup>Pb ratio can be obtained from the product of the <sup>232</sup>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>238</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U, and <sup>232</sup>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>207</sup>Pb ratios. Because Th is insoluble in water, radiogenic <sup>208</sup>Pb is often absent from carbonates. Therefore, it is generally safe to assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7102">The <sup>235</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>207</sup>Pb method has just one long-lived intermediate daughter, <sup>231</sup>Pa, which requires a correction. Due to <sup>231</sup>Pa's short half-life of 32.65 kyr (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.158(71) Myr<sup>−1</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="altparen.37"/>), it is generally not possible to measure any remaining disequilibrium in the Myr time range, where the <sup>235</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>207</sup>Pb method offers a tangible advantage over the <sup>238</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>206</sup>Pb method. Therefore, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value must be assumed.</p>
      <p id="d2e7253">Pa is chemically similar to Th and insoluble in water.  Therefore, <sup>231</sup>Pa is always depleted relative to <sup>235</sup>U in carbonates, so whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can vary anywhere between 0 and 12 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.38"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always less than 1 and can be safely assumed to be zero. In a worst-case scenario, in which one assumes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 but the true activity ratio is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, this would only bias the <sup>235</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U age by a relatively small amount (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p>

<table-wrap id="T2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e7399">Sensitivity test of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method against <sup>231</sup>Pa disequilibrium.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">True age (Ma)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum bias (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e7509">The degree of potential bias of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method decreases with increasing age, unlike the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method, whose bias increases with age (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). In this sense, the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U and <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U methods are complementary to each other. The <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U is most accurate for samples older than 1 Ma, whereas the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U is more accurate for samples younger than 1 Ma. Note that the latter is similar to the applicability range of the <sup>230</sup>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U method, so one could argue that disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dating is of limited use to carbonate U–Pb geochronology (except to infer  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.39"/>). Although the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method outperforms the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method at ca. 1 Ma in terms of accuracy, its poorer precision means that its potential benefits do not materialize until ca. 2 Ma. In the next section, we will demonstrate this by applying both methods to three different case studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <label>7</label><title>Case studies</title>
      <p id="d2e7791">Having made a largely theoretical case against <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dating and for <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U dating of old carbonates that are suspected to have experienced initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium, we will now compare and contrast the two chronometers using three practical case studies.  The first example will demonstrate the accuracy of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method by showing its consistency with disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates of young (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Ma) samples.</p>
      <p id="d2e7928">The second example uses ID-TIMS data to serve two purposes. First, it will show that the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method produces more accurate, more consistent, and more precise results than the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method  for older (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Ma) carbonates. Second, it will demonstrate how the Bayesian framework can use prior information to overcome the inaccuracy of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method.</p>
      <p id="d2e8014">In the third case study we apply the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method to LA-ICP-MS data using <sup>208</sup>Pb as a proxy for common Pb. In addition to highlighting a successful application where the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method produces demonstrably superior results to the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method, this dataset also illustrates limitations of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U approach with a sample that yields a precise <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron and an unusably imprecise <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS1">
  <label>7.1</label><title>ID-ICP-MS data from Siberia</title>
      <p id="d2e8186">A rich dataset of 72 speleothem dates is available from the Botovskaya and Ledyanaya Lenskaya (LLC) caves in Siberia. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.40"/> used the U–Pb method to extend an important palaeoclimatological archive from these caves that was previously dated using the <sup>230</sup>Th–U disequilibrium method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.41"/>. Samples were analysed by isotope dilution ICP-MS and were found to exhibit a significant level of <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium. U–Pb ages were estimated using a two-step procedure. First, the common-Pb contribution was removed by two-point isochron regression through an inherited composition that was inferred by inspection of apparent linear trends in Tera–Wasserburg concordia space. Second, a <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibrium correction was applied to the radiogenic end-member composition, using the procedures described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>.  This correction combined the measured <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios with an assumed absence of initial <sup>230</sup>Th and <sup>231</sup>Pa.</p>
      <p id="d2e8301">The inferred <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were ca. 2 and 3–5 for LLC and Botovskaya cave, respectively. This corresponds to an age correction of 15 % for LLC and 60 % for Botovskaya cave (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). Uncertainties were estimated using the Bayesian procedure of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, making the optimistic assumption that the analytical uncertainty of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements faithfully captures all sources of dispersion. The scatter of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values suggests that this may not be the case. This caveat notwithstanding, the disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U ages overlap within uncertainty in all but four of the samples.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e8418">Reanalysis of the speleothem data of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.42"/>. This record stacks together several speleothems, which are arranged in stratigraphic order for each cave. <bold>(a)</bold> Uncorrected (circles) and corrected (black error bars) <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U dates, juxtaposed next to the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U dates (blue error bars) for the same samples. <bold>(b)</bold> Measured (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, circles) and inferred initial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, error bars) <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratios. All error bars represent Bayesian 95 % credible intervals. Sample 5 does not have a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement and was assumed to be in secular equilibrium. Sample 41 is an outlier  that has an anomalously high common-Pb concentration and is only included for the sake of completeness.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8571">The <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U age uncertainty is invariably larger than the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U age uncertainty.  In fact, below ca. 1 Ma, it could be argued that the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U age uncertainties are unusably imprecise (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %).  However, above ca. 1 Ma, the uncertainty reduces to acceptable levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %).  Extrapolating this trend further into the past confirms the earlier assertion that beyond ca. 2 Ma, the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method outperforms the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method in both accuracy and precision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS2">
  <label>7.2</label><title>ID-TIMS data for ASH-15</title>
      <p id="d2e8761">ASH-15 is a carbonate U–Pb dating reference material sourced from a flowstone in Ashalim cave of southern Israel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.43"/>. 37 ID-TIMS measurements were obtained from the flowstone, including 12 from horizon D and 25 from horizon K. The latter are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.44"/> report an uncorrected semitotal-Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U isochron age of 2.965 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.011 Ma for ASH-15.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e8788">ID-TIMS U–Pb data for flowstone ASH-15K <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.45"/>. <bold>(a)</bold> Informative prior for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on the data compilation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.46"/>; <bold>(b)</bold> likelihood function for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the activity ratio measurements of ASH-15C1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.47"/>; <bold>(c, d)</bold> posterior probabilities for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,  respectively; <bold>(e)</bold> the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron, fitted using the model-3 algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.48"/>, with the excess dispersion shown as a horizontal 95 % error bar; and <bold>(f)</bold> the model-1 <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron. The grey uncertainty bands represent the standard errors of the isochron fits and do not reflect the Bayesian credible intervals.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8941">No <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio measurements are available for ASH-15D and ASH-15K. However, two other horizons of the same flowstone (ASH-15A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>B and ASH-15C1) are characterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.99939 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00108 and 0.99925 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0015, indistinguishable from secular equilibrium. Younger flowstones in Ashalim cave yield an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 1.0470, with a standard deviation of 0.01492 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.49"/>. A wider survey of 904 speleothem samples dated in southern and central Israel by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.50"/> have average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 1.081 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.138. Despite this lack of observable disequilibrium, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.51"/> suggest a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 1.5–2.0 to explain the minor degree of discordance of the common-Pb-corrected Tera–Wasserburg ratios.</p>
      <p id="d2e9085">To investigate the effect of initial U-series disequilibrium on ASH-15, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a and b apply the Bayesian inversion algorithm to the ASH-15K data, using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of ASH-15C1 and assuming that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 (i.e. no initial <sup>230</sup>Th). In a first attempt, we will use the same uniform prior from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 as before. This results in a disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U-isochron age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.053</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.794</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma and an inferred <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.067</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.052</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As expected, initial equilibrium is very plausible with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.47. The initial activity ratio preferred by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.52"/> cannot be ruled out either but is less likely, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09.</p>
      <p id="d2e9366">In a second attempt, we used the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.53"/> to construct an informative prior, using the logistic normal formulation of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.081, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2.  This produces a posterior distribution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is, essentially, identical to the prior, confirming that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data carry virtually no additional information. The corresponding disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U-isochron age is 3.107 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.065 Ma.</p>
      <p id="d2e9521">In contrast with the widely varying scenarios for the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method, the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron age calculation is straightforward: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e9577">an uncorrected <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron age of 3.039 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068 Ma, assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e9642">a corrected <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron age of 3.086 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068 Ma, assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.</p></list-item></list> These are nearly identical to the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U date using the informative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior. We would like to conclude the discussion of ASH-15 by remarking that disequilibrium issues do not affect the suitability of this sample as a reference material for in situ U–Pb geochronology. This is because standardization is done relative to the <italic>uncorrected</italic> isotopic composition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS3">
  <label>7.3</label><title>LA-ICP-MS data from Siberia</title>
      <p id="d2e9766">For the final case study, we return from Israel to the Botovskaya cave deposits in Siberia. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7.SS1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> show abundant evidence that this cave is strongly enriched in initial <sup>234</sup>U, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging from 3 to 5 according to the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.55"/>. The effect of this strong disequilibrium can be confidently undone for the young (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 ka) speleothems shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>. However, Botovskaya cave also contains speleothems that are considerably older than this, going all the way back to the Plio-Pleistocene. By now it should be clear that the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method is ill suited to unlock this older archive. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> summarizes some preliminary U–Pb results from two of these older cave deposits (sample SB-1625-22 and sample SB-72-8) obtained by LA-ICP-MS.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e9843">LA-ICP-MS data for two speleothems from Botovskaya cave in Siberia. <bold>(a)</bold> Model-3 <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron regression for sample SB-1625-22. The equivalent model-1 isochron age (with MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9) is 2.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 Ma. <bold>(b)</bold> Model-1 <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron for SB-1625-22; <bold>(c)</bold> model-1 <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U, and <bold>(d)</bold> <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochrons for sample SB-72-8 (2.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.33 Ma).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/7/459/2025/gchron-7-459-2025-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e9988">As mentioned before under the discussion of the Bolt's Cave data, the <sup>204</sup>Pb measurements produced by this technique are imprecise and potentially inaccurate. In this case, <sup>208</sup>Pb was measured and can be used as a substitute for <sup>204</sup>Pb. Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U ratios (also measured by LA-ICP-MS) were extremely low, allowing us to ignore the radiogenic <sup>208</sup>Pb contribution.</p>
      <p id="d2e10035">The uncorrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron age of sample SB-1625-22 is 2.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 Ma and exhibits significant overdispersion with respect to the analytical uncertainties (MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36). Model-3 isochron regression (sensu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="altparen.56"/>) indicates that this excess scatter is equivalent to an age dispersion of 104 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 kyr (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a). In reality, the excess dispersion around the isochron is unlikely to reflect diachronous isotopic closure. A more likely explanation for the scatter of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U data is spatial variability of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. In summary, the actual dispersion estimate probably has no physical meaning, but the isochron age should be as accurate as mathematically possible. The reduction of the scatter around the Botovskaya isochrons (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a and c) towards the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> intercept also suggests that the common-Pb ratio is not substantially correlated with the postulated heterogeneous initial disequilibrium.</p>
      <p id="d2e10146">Given the antiquity of the sample and the difficulty of measuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by LA-ICP-MS, no initial disequilibrium measurement was made. Switching from <sup>206</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U to <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron space lowers the age to 1.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 Ma whilst reducing the dispersion of the data around the isochron line (MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b). To verify the accuracy of this result, it is useful to point out that a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 3.9 would bring the corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron in alignment with the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron. Such a value is consistent with the initial activity ratios of the more recent Botovskaya deposits (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b). This not only supports the accuracy of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron results but also suggests that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios have remained stable over hundreds of thousands of years.</p>
      <p id="d2e10352">We would like to conclude this section by drawing attention to the fact that the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method is not always successful. Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>c and d show that Botovskaya sample SB-72-8 produces a well-defined linear array in <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron space but fails to do so in <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron space. Such cases are not rare. The <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U approach only works in samples that are sufficiently rich in U and sufficiently poor in common Pb. Speleothems from Botovskaya are rich in U (30–170 ppm for SB-72-8), so that here the problem seems to originate from common Pb (0.4–4 ppm for SB-72-8).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8">
  <label>8</label><title>Implementation in <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace></title>
      <p id="d2e10471">All the methods described in this paper have been implemented in the <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace> toolbox for geochronological data processing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.57"/>. The matrix exponential disequilibrium correction method of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> has been part of <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace> since version 3.0, whereas the deterministic Bayesian uncertainty estimation routine of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> was introduced in version 5.2.  At the time of writing, <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace> (version 6.7) supports 12 different U–Pb data formats. Disequilibrium corrected U–Pb isochron regression is available for all these formats, in different forms.</p>
      <p id="d2e10491">Formats 1–3 contain neither <sup>204</sup>Pb nor <sup>208</sup>Pb. Therefore, isochron regression for these formats must be done by semitotal-Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U regression in Tera–Wasserburg concordia space. Formats 4–6 include <sup>204</sup>Pb as a common-Pb tracer. These formats permit the calculation of both <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochrons, either jointly (by  three-dimensional total-Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U isochron regression; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.58"/>) or separately. To take full advantage of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U method's superior accuracy, it is recommended to use the two-dimensional option. Formats 7 and 8 use <sup>208</sup>Pb as a common-Pb tracer. They are also amenable to both <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron regression, either jointly (by total-Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U–Th regression; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.59"/>) or separately. Formats 9–10 and 11–12 are simplified versions of formats 4–6 and 7–8, respectively, which only permit two-dimensional regression. Formats 9 and 11 are meant for <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U isochron regression, whereas formats 10 and 12 are meant for <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron regression.</p>
      <p id="d2e10737">The disequilibrium corrections can be accessed from <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace>'s GUI (either online or offline) by using the “isochron” function and ticking the “apply disequilibrium correction” check box in the options menu. Alternatively, the same functionality can also be accessed from the command-line API. Bayesian uncertainty estimation is possible using either interface, but visualizing the posterior distributions of the parameter space is currently only possible from the command line.</p>
      <p id="d2e10744">The Supplement provides all the <monospace>R</monospace> code that was used to reproduce the figures in this paper <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.60"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>9</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e10761">In this paper, we presented a critical appraisal of carbonate U–Pb geochronology and proposed three improvements to the technique. First, we introduced a matrix exponential solution to the initial disequilibrium problem, extending the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.61"/>. This formulation produces identical results to the conventional solution by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.62"/> but can be written out more succinctly and can more easily be modified to suit other problems. For example, the matrix exponential approach can be adjusted to calculate disequilibrium-corrected U–Th–He ages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.63"/>. Second, we presented a deterministic Bayesian algorithm to quantify the statistical uncertainty associated with the disequilibrium correction. This algorithm was used to demonstrate that, for samples older than ca. 2 Ma, disequilibrium-corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U geochronology is unreliable. Third, we advocated the use of the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U isochron method as a more accurate alternative to the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method.</p>
      <p id="d2e10850">Although our findings are most relevant to young carbonates, the inaccuracy of the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U method equally applies to old samples. Only the relative difference between the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U ages reduces with time. The absolute difference remains constant at up to 4 Myr (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). The corresponding systematic uncertainty cannot be removed without making unverifiable assumptions about the initial <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U activity ratio. For samples older than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 Ma, say, the systematic error caused by initial disequilibrium is generally smaller than the random errors associated with the isotope ratio measurements. However, given a sufficiently precise set of isochrons, it is theoretically possible to reconstruct the U disequilibrium conditions at the time of isotopic closure from the difference between the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U clocks.</p>
      <p id="d2e11015"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.64"/> advocate using the same procedure in Quaternary studies.  They propose a two-step procedure, whereby the difference between the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U dates is used to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is then used to calculate a corrected <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U age. <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace> implements a one-step algorithm that achieves the same goal using the total-Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.65"/> and the total-Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U–Th algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.66"/>. However, we would like to add a note of caution about the usefulness of this joint regression procedure. Beyond ca. 2 Ma, all the age-resolving power of the paired <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U approach resides in the <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U clock, so the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U data add no value.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e11264"><monospace>IsoplotR</monospace> is free software released  under the GPL-3 licence. The package and its source code are  available from <uri>https://cran.r-project.org/package=IsoplotR</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.67"/>. The test data used in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S8"/> are provided at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16262131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.16262131</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.68"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e11287">NM developed the matrix exponential solution to  the initial disequilibrium problem; PV developed  the deterministic Bayesian inversion algorithm; RP proposed the  <sup>207</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>235</sup>U fix to the <sup>206</sup>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U  problems; AV, TG, and SB provided the Siberian data; and PV wrote the  paper, with feedback from the other authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e11344">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Geochronology</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e11353">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e11359">This paper benefited from thorough reviews by Perach Nuriel, Timothy Pollard, and Robyn Pickering.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e11364">This research has been supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/T001518/1, awarded to Pieter Vermeesch) and the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. RPG-20202-334, awarded to Sebastian F. M. Breitenbach).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e11370">This paper was edited by Axel Schmitt and reviewed by Perach Nuriel and Robyn Pickering.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Albarède(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Albarède, F.: Introduction to Geochemical Modeling, Cambridge University  Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511622960</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Audi et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Audi, G., Bersillon, O., Blachot, J., and Wapstra, A. H.: The NUBASE  evaluation of nuclear and decay properties, Nucl. Phys. A, 729, 3–128,  2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bateman(1908)</label><mixed-citation> Bateman, H.: The solution of a system of differential equations occurring in  the theory of radio-active transformations, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 15, 423–427, 1908.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Chaldekas et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation> Chaldekas, O., Vaks, A., Haviv, I., Gerdes, A., and Albert, R.: U-Pb  speleothem geochronology reveals a major 6 Ma uplift phase along the western  margin of Dead Sea Transform, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 134, 1571–1584, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Cheng et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Shen, C.-C., Polyak, V. J., Asmerom, Y., Woodhead,  J., Hellstrom, J., Wang, Y., Kong, X., Spötl, C., Wang, X., and Calvin Alexander, E.: Improvements in <sup>230</sup>Th dating, <sup>230</sup>Th and <sup>234</sup>U half-life values, and U–Th isotopic measurements by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 371, 82–91, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Danišík et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Danišík, M., Schmitt, A. K., Stockli, D. F., Lovera, O. M., Dunkl, I., and Evans, N. J.: Application of combined U-Th-disequilibrium/U-Pb and (U-Th)/He zircon dating to tephrochronology, Quat. Geochronol., 40, 23–32, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Engel et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Engel, J., Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., Maas, R., Drysdale, R., and Ford, D.: Corrections for initial isotopic disequilibrium in the speleothem U-Pb  dating method, Quat. Geochronol., 54, 101009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Farley et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation> Farley, K., Kohn, B., and Pillans, B.: The effects of secular disequilibrium  on (U–Th)/He systematics and dating of Quaternary volcanic zircon and  apatite, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 201, 117–125, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Fleischer(1982)</label><mixed-citation> Fleischer, R. L.: Alpha-recoil damage and solution effects in minerals: uranium isotopic disequilibrium and radon release, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,  46, 2191–2201, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Horstwood et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Horstwood, M. S., Košler, J., Gehrels, G., Jackson, S. E., McLean, N. M., Paton, C., Pearson, N. J., Sircombe, K., Sylvester, P., Vermeesch, P.,  Bowring, J. F., Condon, D. J., and Schoene, B.: Community-Derived Standards for LA-ICP-MS U-(Th-)Pb Geochronology – Uncertainty Propagation, Age Interpretation and Data Reporting, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 40, 311–332, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Jaffey et al.(1971)</label><mixed-citation>Jaffey, A., Flynn, K., Glendenin, L., Bentley, W., and Essling, A.: Precision  measurement of half-lives and specific activities of <sup>235</sup>U and <sup>238</sup>U,  Phys. Rev. C, 4, 1889–1906, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Kaufman and Broecker(1965)</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman, A. and Broecker, W.: Comparison of Th<sup>230</sup> and C<sup>14</sup> ages for  carbonate materials from Lakes Lahontan and Bonneville, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 4039–4054, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Kronfeld et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Kronfeld, J., Vogel, J., and Talma, A.: A new explanation for extreme  <sup>234</sup>U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <sup>238</sup>U disequilibria in a dolomitic aquifer, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 123, 81–93, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Kuribayashi et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Kuribayashi, C., Miyakawa, K., Ito, A., and Tanimizu, M.: Large disequilibrium of <sup>234</sup>U/<sup>238</sup>U isotope ratios in deep groundwater and its potential application as a groundwater mixing indicator, Geochem. J., 59,  35–44, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Le Roux and Glendenin(1963)</label><mixed-citation>Le Roux, L. J. and Glendenin, L. E.: Half-life of <sup>232</sup>Th, Proceedings of the National Meeting on Nuclear Energy, Pretoria, South Africa, 5–8 April 1963, <uri>https://lccn.loc.gov/89460516</uri> (last access: 8 October 2025), 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Ludwig(1977)</label><mixed-citation> Ludwig, K. R.: Effect of initial radioactive-daughter disequilibrium on U-Pb  isotope apparent ages of young minerals, J. Res. US Geol. Surv., 5, 663–667,  1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Ludwig(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Ludwig, K. R.: On the treatment of concordant uranium-lead ages, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 665–676, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00059-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00059-3</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Ludwig(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Ludwig, K. R.: Mathematical–statistical treatment of data and errors for  <sup>230</sup>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> U geochronology, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 52,  631–656, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Mason et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Mason, A. J., Henderson, G. M., and Vaks, A.: An acetic acid-based extraction  protocol for the recovery of U, Th and Pb from calcium carbonates for  U-(Th)-Pb geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 37, 261–275, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Neymark and Amelin(2008)</label><mixed-citation> Neymark, L. and Amelin, Y.: Natural radionuclide mobility and its influence on U–Th–Pb dating of secondary minerals from the unsaturated zone at Yucca  Mountain, Nevada, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 2067–2089, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Nuriel et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Nuriel, P., Wotzlaw, J.-F., Ovtcharova, M., Vaks, A., Stremtan, C., Šala, M., Roberts, N. M. W., and Kylander-Clark, A. R. C.: The use of ASH-15 flowstone as a matrix-matched reference material for laser-ablation U–Pb geochronology of calcite, Geochronology, 3, 35–47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-35-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-3-35-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Osmond and Cowart(1976)</label><mixed-citation> Osmond, J. K. and Cowart, J. B.: The theory and uses of natural uranium isotopic variations in hydrology, Atom. Energy Rev., 14, 621–679, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Pickering et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Pickering, R., Herries, A. I., Woodhead, J. D., Hellstrom, J. C., Green, H. E., Paul, B., Ritzman, T., Strait, D. S., Schoville, B. J., and Hancox, P. J.: U–Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases, Nature, 565, 226, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Pollard et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Pollard, T., Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., Engel, J., Powell, R., and Drysdale, R.: DQPB: software for calculating disequilibrium U–Pb ages, Geochronology, 5, 181–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Porcelli and Swarzenski(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Porcelli, D. and Swarzenski, P. W.: The behavior of U-and Th-series nuclides  in groundwater, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 52, 317–361, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Richards et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation> Richards, D. A., Bottrell, S. H., Cliff, R. A., Ströhle, K., and Rowe,  P. J.: U-Pb dating of a speleothem of Quaternary age, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 3683–3688, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Roberts et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, N. M. W., Drost, K., Horstwood, M. S. A., Condon, D. J., Chew, D., Drake, H., Milodowski, A. E., McLean, N. M., Smye, A. J., Walker, R. J., Haslam, R., Hodson, K., Imber, J., Beaudoin, N., and Lee, J. K.: Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations, Geochronology, 2, 33–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Smith and Farquhar(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Smith, P. E. and Farquhar, R. M.: Direct dating of Phanerozoic sediments by  the <sup>238</sup>U–<sup>206</sup>Pb method, Nature, 341, 518–521, 1989. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Vaks et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Vaks, A., Bar-Matthews, M., Matthews, A., Ayalon, A., and Frumkin, A.:  Middle-Late Quaternary paleoclimate of northern margins of the  Saharan-Arabian Desert: reconstruction from speleothems of Negev Desert,  Israel, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 2647–2662, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Vaks et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation> Vaks, A., Gutareva, O. S., Breitenbach, S. F., Avirmed, E., Mason, A. J.,  Thomas, A. L., Osinzev, A. V., Kononov, A. M., and Henderson, G. M.: Speleothems reveal 500,000-year history of Siberian permafrost, Science,  340, 183–186, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Vaks et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation> Vaks, A., Woodhead, J., Bar-Matthews, M., Ayalon, A., Cliff, R., Zilberman, T., Matthews, A., and Frumkin, A.: Pliocene–Pleistocene climate of the northern margin of Saharan–Arabian Desert recorded in speleothems from the Negev Desert, Israel, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 368, 88–100, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Vaks et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Vaks, A., Mason, A., Breitenbach, S., Kononov, A., Osinzev, A., Rosensaft, M., Borshevsky, A., Gutareva, O., and Henderson, G.: Palaeoclimate evidence of vulnerable permafrost during times of low sea ice, Nature, 577, 221–225,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Vermeesch(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: <monospace>IsoplotR</monospace>: a free and open toolbox for geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, 2018 (data available at: <uri>https://cran.r-project.org/package=IsoplotR</uri>, last access: 21 July 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Vermeesch(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: Unifying the U–Pb and Th–Pb methods: joint isochron regression and common Pb correction, Geochronology, 2, 119–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-119-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-2-119-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Vermeesch(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR, Geochronology, 6, 397–407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Vermeesch(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: Data and code for “Carbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> problems and potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixes”, Version v1, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16262131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.16262131</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Vermeesch et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P., Hopley, P., Roberts, N., and Parrish, R.: Geochronology of Taung and other southern African australopiths, in: One hundred years of <italic>Australopithecus africanus</italic>, edited by Wood, B. A., Grine, F. E., and  Smith, H. B., Springer, Chap. 4, EarthArXiv, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DB43" ext-link-type="DOI">10.31223/X5DB43</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Walker et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Walker, J., Cliff, R. A., and Latham, A. G.: U–Pb isotopic age of the StW 573 hominid from Sterkfontein, South Africa, Science, 314, 1592–1594, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Wendt and Carl(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Wendt, I. and Carl, C.: U <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Pb dating of discordant 0.1 Ma old secondary U minerals, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 73, 278–284, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Woodhead et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., Maas, R., Drysdale, R., Zanchetta, G., Devine, P., and Taylor, E.: U–Pb geochronology of speleothems by MC-ICPMS, Quat. Geochronol., 1, 208–221, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Zhou et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, J., Lundstrom, C. C., Fouke, B., Panno, S., Hackley, K., and Curry, B.:  Geochemistry of speleothem records from southern Illinois: Development of  (<sup>234</sup>U) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (<sup>238</sup>U) as a proxy for paleoprecipitation, Chem. Geol.,  221, 1–20, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Carbonate <sup>206</sup>Pb&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>238</sup>U problems and potential <sup>207</sup>Pb&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>235</sup>U fixes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Albarède(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Albarède, F.: Introduction to Geochemical Modeling, Cambridge University  Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622960</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Audi et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Audi, G., Bersillon, O., Blachot, J., and Wapstra, A. H.: The NUBASE  evaluation of nuclear and decay properties, Nucl. Phys. A, 729, 3–128,  2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bateman(1908)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bateman, H.: The solution of a system of differential equations occurring in  the theory of radio-active transformations, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 15, 423–427, 1908.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Chaldekas et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chaldekas, O., Vaks, A., Haviv, I., Gerdes, A., and Albert, R.: U-Pb  speleothem geochronology reveals a major 6 Ma uplift phase along the western  margin of Dead Sea Transform, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 134, 1571–1584, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Cheng et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Shen, C.-C., Polyak, V. J., Asmerom, Y., Woodhead,  J., Hellstrom, J., Wang, Y., Kong, X., Spötl, C., Wang, X., and Calvin Alexander, E.: Improvements in <sup>230</sup>Th dating, <sup>230</sup>Th and <sup>234</sup>U half-life values, and U–Th isotopic measurements by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 371, 82–91, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Danišík et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Danišík, M., Schmitt, A. K., Stockli, D. F., Lovera, O. M., Dunkl, I., and Evans, N. J.: Application of combined U-Th-disequilibrium/U-Pb and (U-Th)/He zircon dating to tephrochronology, Quat. Geochronol., 40, 23–32, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Engel et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Engel, J., Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., Maas, R., Drysdale, R., and Ford, D.: Corrections for initial isotopic disequilibrium in the speleothem U-Pb  dating method, Quat. Geochronol., 54, 101009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101009</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Farley et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farley, K., Kohn, B., and Pillans, B.: The effects of secular disequilibrium  on (U–Th)/He systematics and dating of Quaternary volcanic zircon and  apatite, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 201, 117–125, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Fleischer(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fleischer, R. L.: Alpha-recoil damage and solution effects in minerals: uranium isotopic disequilibrium and radon release, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,  46, 2191–2201, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Horstwood et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Horstwood, M. S., Košler, J., Gehrels, G., Jackson, S. E., McLean, N. M., Paton, C., Pearson, N. J., Sircombe, K., Sylvester, P., Vermeesch, P.,  Bowring, J. F., Condon, D. J., and Schoene, B.: Community-Derived Standards for LA-ICP-MS U-(Th-)Pb Geochronology – Uncertainty Propagation, Age Interpretation and Data Reporting, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 40, 311–332, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Jaffey et al.(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaffey, A., Flynn, K., Glendenin, L., Bentley, W., and Essling, A.: Precision  measurement of half-lives and specific activities of <sup>235</sup>U and <sup>238</sup>U,  Phys. Rev. C, 4, 1889–1906, 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Kaufman and Broecker(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaufman, A. and Broecker, W.: Comparison of Th<sup>230</sup> and C<sup>14</sup> ages for  carbonate materials from Lakes Lahontan and Bonneville, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 4039–4054, 1965.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Kronfeld et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kronfeld, J., Vogel, J., and Talma, A.: A new explanation for extreme  <sup>234</sup>U&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>238</sup>U disequilibria in a dolomitic aquifer, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 123, 81–93, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Kuribayashi et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuribayashi, C., Miyakawa, K., Ito, A., and Tanimizu, M.: Large disequilibrium of <sup>234</sup>U/<sup>238</sup>U isotope ratios in deep groundwater and its potential application as a groundwater mixing indicator, Geochem. J., 59,  35–44, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Le Roux and Glendenin(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Le Roux, L. J. and Glendenin, L. E.: Half-life of <sup>232</sup>Th, Proceedings of the National Meeting on Nuclear Energy, Pretoria, South Africa, 5–8 April 1963, <a href="https://lccn.loc.gov/89460516" target="_blank"/> (last access: 8 October 2025), 1963.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Ludwig(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ludwig, K. R.: Effect of initial radioactive-daughter disequilibrium on U-Pb  isotope apparent ages of young minerals, J. Res. US Geol. Surv., 5, 663–667,  1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Ludwig(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ludwig, K. R.: On the treatment of concordant uranium-lead ages, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 665–676, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00059-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00059-3</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Ludwig(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ludwig, K. R.: Mathematical–statistical treatment of data and errors for  <sup>230</sup>Th&thinsp;∕&thinsp;U geochronology, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 52,  631–656, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Mason et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mason, A. J., Henderson, G. M., and Vaks, A.: An acetic acid-based extraction  protocol for the recovery of U, Th and Pb from calcium carbonates for  U-(Th)-Pb geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 37, 261–275, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Neymark and Amelin(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neymark, L. and Amelin, Y.: Natural radionuclide mobility and its influence on U–Th–Pb dating of secondary minerals from the unsaturated zone at Yucca  Mountain, Nevada, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 2067–2089, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Nuriel et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nuriel, P., Wotzlaw, J.-F., Ovtcharova, M., Vaks, A., Stremtan, C., Šala, M., Roberts, N. M. W., and Kylander-Clark, A. R. C.: The use of ASH-15 flowstone as a matrix-matched reference material for laser-ablation U–Pb geochronology of calcite, Geochronology, 3, 35–47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-35-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-35-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Osmond and Cowart(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Osmond, J. K. and Cowart, J. B.: The theory and uses of natural uranium isotopic variations in hydrology, Atom. Energy Rev., 14, 621–679, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Pickering et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickering, R., Herries, A. I., Woodhead, J. D., Hellstrom, J. C., Green, H. E., Paul, B., Ritzman, T., Strait, D. S., Schoville, B. J., and Hancox, P. J.: U–Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases, Nature, 565, 226, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Pollard et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pollard, T., Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., Engel, J., Powell, R., and Drysdale, R.: DQPB: software for calculating disequilibrium U–Pb ages, Geochronology, 5, 181–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Porcelli and Swarzenski(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Porcelli, D. and Swarzenski, P. W.: The behavior of U-and Th-series nuclides  in groundwater, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 52, 317–361, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Richards et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Richards, D. A., Bottrell, S. H., Cliff, R. A., Ströhle, K., and Rowe,  P. J.: U-Pb dating of a speleothem of Quaternary age, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 3683–3688, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Roberts et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roberts, N. M. W., Drost, K., Horstwood, M. S. A., Condon, D. J., Chew, D., Drake, H., Milodowski, A. E., McLean, N. M., Smye, A. J., Walker, R. J., Haslam, R., Hodson, K., Imber, J., Beaudoin, N., and Lee, J. K.: Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations, Geochronology, 2, 33–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Smith and Farquhar(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, P. E. and Farquhar, R. M.: Direct dating of Phanerozoic sediments by  the <sup>238</sup>U–<sup>206</sup>Pb method, Nature, 341, 518–521, 1989.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Vaks et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vaks, A., Bar-Matthews, M., Matthews, A., Ayalon, A., and Frumkin, A.:  Middle-Late Quaternary paleoclimate of northern margins of the  Saharan-Arabian Desert: reconstruction from speleothems of Negev Desert,  Israel, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 2647–2662, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Vaks et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vaks, A., Gutareva, O. S., Breitenbach, S. F., Avirmed, E., Mason, A. J.,  Thomas, A. L., Osinzev, A. V., Kononov, A. M., and Henderson, G. M.: Speleothems reveal 500,000-year history of Siberian permafrost, Science,  340, 183–186, 2013a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Vaks et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vaks, A., Woodhead, J., Bar-Matthews, M., Ayalon, A., Cliff, R., Zilberman, T., Matthews, A., and Frumkin, A.: Pliocene–Pleistocene climate of the northern margin of Saharan–Arabian Desert recorded in speleothems from the Negev Desert, Israel, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 368, 88–100, 2013b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Vaks et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vaks, A., Mason, A., Breitenbach, S., Kononov, A., Osinzev, A., Rosensaft, M., Borshevsky, A., Gutareva, O., and Henderson, G.: Palaeoclimate evidence of vulnerable permafrost during times of low sea ice, Nature, 577, 221–225,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Vermeesch(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.: <span style="" class="text typewriter">IsoplotR</span>: a free and open toolbox for geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, 2018 (data available at: <a href="https://cran.r-project.org/package=IsoplotR" target="_blank"/>, last access:
21 July 2025).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Vermeesch(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.: Unifying the U–Pb and Th–Pb methods: joint isochron regression and common Pb correction, Geochronology, 2, 119–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-119-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-119-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Vermeesch(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.: Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR, Geochronology, 6, 397–407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Vermeesch(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.: Data and code for “Carbonate <sup>206</sup>Pb∕<sup>238</sup>U problems and potential <sup>207</sup>Pb∕<sup>235</sup>U fixes”, Version v1, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16262131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16262131</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Vermeesch et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P., Hopley, P., Roberts, N., and Parrish, R.: Geochronology of Taung and other southern African australopiths, in: One hundred years of <i>Australopithecus africanus</i>, edited by Wood, B. A., Grine, F. E., and  Smith, H. B., Springer, Chap. 4, EarthArXiv, <a href="https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DB43" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DB43</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Walker et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walker, J., Cliff, R. A., and Latham, A. G.: U–Pb isotopic age of the StW 573 hominid from Sterkfontein, South Africa, Science, 314, 1592–1594, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Wendt and Carl(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wendt, I. and Carl, C.: U&thinsp;∕&thinsp;Pb dating of discordant 0.1&thinsp;Ma old secondary U minerals, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 73, 278–284, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Woodhead et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., Maas, R., Drysdale, R., Zanchetta, G., Devine, P., and Taylor, E.: U–Pb geochronology of speleothems by MC-ICPMS, Quat. Geochronol., 1, 208–221, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Zhou et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, J., Lundstrom, C. C., Fouke, B., Panno, S., Hackley, K., and Curry, B.:  Geochemistry of speleothem records from southern Illinois: Development of  (<sup>234</sup>U)&thinsp;∕&thinsp;(<sup>238</sup>U) as a proxy for paleoprecipitation, Chem. Geol.,  221, 1–20, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
