<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GChron</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geochronology</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GChron</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geochronology</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2628-3719</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gchron-8-661-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Coupled K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS – reaction gas optimisation and geological applications</article-title><alt-title>Coupled K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gilbert</surname><given-names>Sarah E.</given-names></name>
          <email>sarah.gilbert@adelaide.edu.au</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Glorie</surname><given-names>Stijn</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-9028</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lloyd</surname><given-names>Jarred C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Adelaide Microscopy, Adelaide University, Adelaide, 5005, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Discipline of Earth Sciences, School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, 5005, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sarah E. Gilbert (sarah.gilbert@adelaide.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>661</fpage><lpage>678</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Sarah E. Gilbert et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026.html">This article is available from https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e105">Both the Rb–Sr and K–Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-decay isotopic systems can be used to date a range of mica- and feldspar-group minerals and have the potential to unravel cooling and alteration processes across a wide range of geological settings. The development of LA-ICP-MS/MS has enabled direct in-situ analysis of these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-decay geochronometers via chemical separation with reactive gases within the mass-spectrometer. In addition to rapid analysis, a main advantage of in-situ K–Ca dating is the ability to avoid Ca- and Sr-bearing inclusions, which are a limiting factor for conventional bulk mineral dating via TIMS. Both Sr and Ca are highly reactive with both SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O to form M-F, M-O or M-OH reaction products. In contrast, K and Rb are non-reactive with either gas enabling efficient separation of the parent-daughter isotope pairs, <sup>40</sup>K–<sup>40</sup>Ca and <sup>87</sup>Rb–<sup>87</sup>Sr. Additionally, mixing a small amount of H<sub>2</sub> with SF<sub>6</sub> or N<sub>2</sub>O efficiently eliminates <sup>40</sup>Ar based interferences and reduces the background generated by the high ion load in the reaction cell when measuring mass to charge ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) 40. This study compares the accuracy, precision, and product ion sensitivity of four reaction gas combinations: SF<sub>6</sub> only, SF<sub>6</sub> plus 2 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O plus 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O plus 10 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>, by analysing a range of micas and feldspars with previously constrained dates: MDC and Kola phlogopites, Högsbo and Robins Folly muscovites, G71560 polylithionite, and F-KN and Bohus K-feldspars. Using these gas mixtures, coupled  Rb–Sr and K–Ca dates were obtained from a single ablation spot in low Ca-bearing (5–300 ppm) micas and feldspars, with age uncertainties of 2 % and 5 %, respectively. The direct coupling of Rb–Sr and K–Ca dates within the same ablation volume allows assessment of isotopic disturbances at high spatial resolution. The gas combination of SF<sub>6</sub> plus 2 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> was found to be the most effective for coupled K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating, producing the highest sensitivity for reacted species while minimising the background on reacted <sup>40</sup>Ca. Analysis of the FK-N feldspar from Madras, India shows the potential for the two isotopic systems to reveal decoupled dates, with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">515</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma Rb–Sr date representing the crystallisation of the granite and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">437</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma K–Ca date indicating late-stage hydrothermal activity.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Australian Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>DP260104272</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e399">Laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is a widely used technique for element and isotopic analyses in the earth sciences and has been used for U–Pb geochronology for over 30 years. Recent technological advancements have led to the development of ICP-MS/MS systems that utilise a reaction cell between two mass selecting devices. This enables selective reactions and chemical separation of atomic and polyatomic interferences using a range of reactive gasses. Coupling this with in-situ sampling by laser ablation has led to an expansion of applications, especially in geochronology (e.g. Gilbert et al., 2024; Gorojovsky and Alard, 2020; Olierook et al., 2020; Tillberg et al., 2020; Laureijs et al., 2021a; Rösel and Zack, 2022; Simpson et al., 2023; Glorie et al., 2023; Tamblyn et al., 2022; Brown et al., 2022). Over the past decade, this technology has been applied to the analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-decay geochronometers such as Rb–Sr, K–Ca, Lu–Hf and Re–Os (Redaa et al., 2021; Simpson et al., 2021; Tamblyn et al., 2024; Hogmalm et al., 2017, 2019; Zack and Hogmalm, 2016). In these systems, the parent and daughter isotopes have the same isotopic mass, creating an isobaric interference. These can be effectively separated using a range of reaction gases: N<sub>2</sub>O, SF<sub>6</sub>, HN<sub>3</sub> or CH<sub>4</sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e445">Radioactive <sup>40</sup>K decays via branched pathways to <sup>40</sup>Ca (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>decay, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and <sup>40</sup>Ar (electron capture, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), enabling both K–Ca and K–Ar (<sup>39</sup>Ar–<sup>40</sup>Ar) dating (Nägler and Villa, 2000). These decay systems can be used to date high K, low common Ca minerals such as biotite, muscovite and K-felspars. Due to similar chemical behaviour and ionic radii, Rb readily substitutes for K in these minerals; hence, minerals that are suitable for K–Ca dating are also suitable for Rb–Sr dating. Micas are readily susceptible to deformation and alteration with reactive fluids. Thus, both isotopic systems can be reset at low temperatures through element diffusion, crystal deformation, and dissolution/recrystallisation and have the potential to be used to determine cooling dates or to improve the understanding of low temperature diagenetic processes (Fletcher et al., 1997; Gopalan, 2008). Although closure temperatures in micas are poorly constrained, an apparent closure temperature for <sup>40</sup>Ca has been calculated at 300 °C (Harrison and Lovera, 2014), compared to 350–550 °C for the Rb–Sr system in micas (Jenkin, 1997; Nebel, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d2e534">Analysis of highly precise Ca isotopes is routine via chemical dissolution and TIMS or MC-ICP-MS analysis for K-Ca dating of minerals (Farkaš, 2016; DePaolo, 2004; Antonelli and Simon, 2020; Gopalan, 2008; Heuser et al., 2002). These techniques can provide the highest level of analytical precision. However, the technique has some limitations: chemical dissolution and column chemistry can be time consuming and can easily incorporate common Ca-bearing inclusions within the target mineral; Ca has low ionisation efficiency by TIMS; and the precision of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios is compromised in high K/Ca minerals due to the low sensitivity of <sup>44</sup>Ca. Analysis by LA-ICP-MS/MS can overcome some of these limitations via rapid analysis at high spatial resolution and is ideally suited to highly radiogenic, low Ca-bearing minerals.</p>
      <p id="d2e563">In-situ Rb–Sr and K–Ca dating via LA-ICP-MS/MS was first demonstrated using N<sub>2</sub>O and SF<sub>6</sub> as reaction gasses (Hogmalm et al., 2017; Zack and Hogmalm, 2016). Uptake of in-situ Rb–Sr dating via LA-ICP-MS/MS has been rapid since then (Loyola et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2022; Subarkah et al., 2022; Liebmann et al., 2022; Jegal et al., 2022; Dauphas et al., 2022; Tillberg et al., 2021; Laureijs et al., 2021b; Olierook et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020). This is primarily due to the highly efficient and “simple” reaction chemistry of Sr with both N<sub>2</sub>O and SF<sub>6</sub>. However, the K–Ca analytical technique is currently underdeveloped and there are several isotopic and analytical challenges to be overcome for in-situ K–Ca dating.</p>
      <p id="d2e603">The parent <sup>40</sup>K is a minor isotope of K (0.012 %), whereas the radiogenic daughter <sup>40</sup>Ca is also the most abundant common Ca isotope (96.9 %). The decay constant for <sup>40</sup>K (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9548</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0134</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a<sup>−1</sup>; Renne et al., 2011) is larger than <sup>87</sup>Rb (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3972</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0045</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a<sup>−1</sup>; Villa et al., 2015), resulting in a shorter half-life and faster production of the daughter <sup>40</sup>Ca than <sup>87</sup>Sr: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (Marshall, 1998) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (Villa et al., 2015). Despite the faster radiogenic ingrowth of K–Ca, the low <sup>40</sup>K parent isotopic abundance requires <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<sup>−1</sup> of K to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<sup>−1</sup> of <sup>40</sup>Ca, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<sup>−1</sup> of Rb to produce the same amount of <sup>87</sup>Sr over 1 Ga (Zack and Gilbert, 2024). Therefore, the radiogenic ingrowth of <sup>40</sup>Ca can easily be overshadowed by the presence of common Ca in the mineral of interest or as inclusions. This study aims to provide a guide for the limitations of K–Ca dating in terms of the resolvable age versus the common Ca content.</p>
      <p id="d2e894">In addition, <sup>40</sup>Ar (99.6 % abundance) is also present at exceedingly high concentrations from the Ar burning ICP. It has been shown that the daughter <sup>40</sup>Ca can be efficiently separated from the non-reactive <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>40</sup>Ar using N<sub>2</sub>O or SF<sub>6</sub> reaction gases (Hogmalm et al., 2017). However, the high ion load from <sup>40</sup>Ar<sup>+</sup> passing through the first quadrupole into the reaction cell has the potential to compromise the analysis and reaction mechanisms. In this study, we investigate the effects of adding H<sub>2</sub> as a second reaction gas to mitigate the Ar<sup>+</sup> via charge transfer reaction (Ar<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eiden et al., 1996; Craig et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e1029">The ease of measuring multiple isotopes across the mass range is a distinct advantage for quadrupole LA-ICP-MS/MS analysis. This enables simultaneous measurement of two, or more, isotope systems from the same ablation volume. This study investigates the accuracy of simultaneous Rb–Sr and K–Ca isotopic measurements by LA-ICP-MS/MS in a range of micas and feldspars, and optimises the analytical procedure through comparison of N<sub>2</sub>O, SF<sub>6</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> reaction gases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Sample descriptions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Mica group minerals</title>
      <p id="d2e1074">The MDC phlogopite was cut from a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm crystal, sourced from the Bekily region, Madagascar (Redaa et al., 2021). It is taken to be the equivalent in geological source and age as the Mica-Mg powdered reference material distributed by the Centre de Recherches Petrographiques et Geochimiques (CRPG; Govindaraju, 1979, 1995). The expected age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">519.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma used in this study, is the average reported Rb–Sr, K–Ar and U–Pb age of the region (Hogmalm et al., 2017; and references therein). The initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72607</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00070</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured from two diopside analyses from the Mica-Mg sample (Morteani et al., 2013). More recent ID-MC-ICP-MS results from the Mica-Mg powdered samples give a relatively imprecise date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">521</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 12 aliquots (Jegal et al., 2022) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">524.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1 aliquot (Redaa et al., 2022), indicating some uncertainty in the batch-to-batch reproducibility of the Rb–Sr age from the Mica-Mg powdered sample.</p>
      <p id="d2e1159">The Kola phlogopite was sourced from the Kovdor Massif, located on the Kola Penisnsula, Kovdorsky District, Russia. The cm-scale phlogopite book was purchased from a mineral dealer and the exact location is unknown. Similar sized phlogopites characteristic of the deposit are formed from high temperature ultrabasic pegmatites within a carbonatite-bearing alkaline-ultrabasic complex (Amelin and Zaitsev, 2002; Krasnova, 2001). A narrow range of TIMS U-Th-Pb dates have been reported from the Kovdor Massif by Amelin and Zaitsev (2002): ca. 378 Ma (baddeleyite, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb lower intercept), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">377.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (zircon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Th), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">377.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (apatite, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb lower intercept) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">380.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (apatite and calcite, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb lower intercept). Baddeleyite dates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">377</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">383</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have also been reported (Bayanova, 2006). Phlogopites have been dated by conventional Rb–Sr, giving a date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">378.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (Amelin and Zaitsev, 2002), recalculated using the decay constant of Villa et al. (2015) and initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70368</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00055</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A weighted mean date based on U–Pb and Rb–Sr analyses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">378.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used as the reference age in this study (Table 1).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1348">Reference ages for minerals used in this study, with additional details in text.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="3.9cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mineral</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Age</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2SE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><sub><italic>i</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<sub>c</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sr<sub>c</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Ma)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Ma)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ppm<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">ppm<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MDC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Phlogopite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">519.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72607</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">55–58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Hogmalm et al. (2017), Morteani et al. (2013), Redaa et al. (2021)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kola</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Phlogopite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">378</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7037</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1–75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Amelin and Zaitsev (2002), Bayanova (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Robins Folly</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Muscovite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">320</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.3–4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Mortimer et al. (1987)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Högsbo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Muscovite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1029.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Hogmalm et al. (2017), Romer and Smeds (1996)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FK-N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K-feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">512</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7093</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100–480</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5–110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Jegal et al. (2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bohus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K-feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">920</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.711</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35–440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">150–300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Eliasson and Schöberg (1991)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G17560</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Polylithionite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">480–530</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07–0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8" align="left">Pedrosa-Soares et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1351"><sup>*</sup> Approximate common (c) Ca and Sr concentrations, measured on <sup>43</sup>Ca and <sup>88</sup>Sr, respectively (Table S10 in the Supplement). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca initial assumed to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Russell et al., 1978).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1825">The Robins Folly muscovite was sourced form undeformed pegmatites in the Hartz Range metaigneous province, Northern Territory, Australia, emplaced during the late stages of the Alice Springs Orogeny (450–300 Ma). The sample was collected near the Ruby Mines from the same location as described in Mortimer et al. (1987). This study reported a whole rock Rb–Sr date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (recalculated using the decay constant of Villa et al., 2015) with an initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7445</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0028</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additional model muscovite and biotite dates from the same area are reported as 327–337 Ma and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">329</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma respectively (Mortimer et al., 1987), suggesting up to 5 % age variability between samples.</p>
      <p id="d2e1881">The Högsbo muscovite was sampled from the Högsbo pegmatite quarry in Gothenburg, Sweden. The crystallisation age of the pegmatite, constrained by a columbite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb TIMS date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1029.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (Romer and Smeds, 1996), was used as the reference in this study, along with an initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72000</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hogmalm et al., 2017). In-situ Rb–Sr dates have been reported as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1037</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma from the Högsbo nano-powder pellet (Hogmalm et al., 2017), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1035</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1039</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma from muscovite crystals (Rösel and Zack, 2022). More recently, an <sup>40</sup>Ar–<sup>39</sup>Ar muscovite date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1025.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma, and in-situ Rb–Sr dates between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1023.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1024</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma, have been reported in Olierook et al. (2026). Significantly younger in situ Rb–Sr dates have also been reported within the same muscovite crystals: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1003</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rösel and Zack, 2022) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">981</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (Olierook et al., 2026), suggesting some alteration of the pegmatites is recorded in the muscovite.</p>
      <p id="d2e2058">The G17560 polylithionite was sourced from the South Australian Museum collection from a non-specific location near Itinga, Minas Gerais, Brazil. This would place it within the Araçuaí District in the Eastern Brazilian Pegmatite Province. Similar gem-quality polylithonite specimens have been found in an artisanal mine within the Taquaral pegmatite field. Two different pegmatite suites have been identified in this region with zircon U–Pb dates of nearby granite bodies ranging from 520–480 and 530–500 Ma (G5 and G4 supersuites; Pedrosa-Soares et al., 2011). There are no published Rb–Sr dates for these pegmatites, nor measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr initial ratios. For this study, the initial was assumed to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.710</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (assumed for enriched magmatic rocks; Rösel and Zack, 2022). The polylithionite contains very high Rb (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt %) and negligible common Sr, making the Sr component highly radiogenic. Hence, the choice of initial Sr ratio has no significant effect on the calculated Rb–Sr date.</p>
      <p id="d2e2100">All micas were sub-sampled from large mica crystals and mounted in epoxy blocks perpendicular to cleavage. Mounting in this orientation produces the most consistent spot-to-spot ablation compared to mounting parallel to cleavage (Larson et al., 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>K-feldspars</title>
      <p id="d2e2111">The FK-N K-feldspar is used as an international trace element reference material, distributed by CRPG (Govindaraju, 1984), sourced from Tamil Nadu Province, India. Feldspar chips from the original source were obtained and mounted for analysis. The FK-N powdered sample has been dated by Jegal et al. (2022), giving an Rb–Sr date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">512</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma. Co-genetic pegmatites and leucogranites from the region have also been dated giving a Rb–Sr date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">521</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma and initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio of 0.7093 (Pandey et al., 1993).</p>
      <p id="d2e2155">The Bohus K-feldspars were separated from the Bohus granite, located in south-west Sweden. The granite massif compromises of several granitic intrusions, and has been commercially quarried since the 1840's. The granite intrudes into the Dal Group (1100 to 1050 Ma) at the end of the Sveconorwegian orogeny. It has a Rb–Sr date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">910</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma and an initial Sr ratio of 0.711, and K–Ar model-ages range from 861 to 680 Ma (Skiöld, 2010). A higher precision zircon U–Pb date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">920</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma is regarded as the crystallisation age of the Bohus granite (Eliasson and Schöberg, 1991).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Analytical Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d2e2198">Analyses were conducted at Adelaide Microscopy, Adelaide University, using a RESOlution-LR 193 nm excimer laser system coupled to an Agilent 8900x ICP-MS/MS. The interface tubing between the laser sample chamber and the ICP torch was cleaned prior to each analytical session and was not used for the ablation of high Ca materials (e.g. NIST glasses, 8.15 wt % Ca) to minimise the potential for Ca-contamination. A pure SiO<sub>2</sub> glass was also ablated at the start of each session to mobilise any residual, previously ablated aerosol particles in the tubing (Gilbert et al., 2014). A Teflon bulb (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL) was used as the signal smoothing device rather than a squid, given the latter is difficult to clean and remain Ca free. Carrier gas flow rates were 350 mL min<sup>−1</sup> He, mixed with 890 mL min<sup>−1</sup> Ar, and the addition of 6 mL min<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub> to enhance sensitivity. The laser parameters for all sessions were: 3.5 J cm<sup>−2</sup> fluence, 5 Hz repetition rate, and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m spot size. All instrument parameters, including ICP-MS/MS lens tuning, are provided in Table S1.</p>
      <p id="d2e2286">A range of reaction gas mixtures and flow rates were tested based on the previously published reaction products of Sr and Ca (Hogmalm et al., 2017; Redaa et al., 2021). The aim was to determine the optimal gas flow rates in terms of reaction product ion sensitivity and the signal to background ratio for <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca (where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the mass shift of the product ions, see reaction gas optimisation section below). The four gas combinations selected for detailed testing were: SF<sub>6</sub> only (0.77 mL min<sup>−1</sup>), SF<sub>6</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> mix (0.57 mL min<sup>−1</sup> and 2 mL min<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), and N<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> mixed in two different proportions: 0.16 mL min<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O and 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>; and 0.16 mL min<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O and 10 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>. These setting are referred to as SF<sub>6</sub> only, SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> low H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> high H<sub>2</sub>, from here on. Using N<sub>2</sub>O as the reaction gas without H<sub>2</sub> was not tested in detail due to the significant production of <sup>40</sup>Ar<sup>16</sup>O which causes an interference with the target <sup>40</sup>Ca<sup>16</sup>O reaction product. When H<sub>2</sub> is added, Ar is neutralised via a charge transfer reaction (Eiden et al., 1996). In our experiments, no Ar reaction products were detected (measured as <sup>36+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ar), indicating the charge transfer reaction is thermodynamically favourable in the reaction cell. Both SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O gases were introduced into the reaction cell using the third mass flow controller (MFC3), N<sub>2</sub>O as 99.999 % purity, and SF<sub>6</sub> as a mixture of 10 % SF<sub>6</sub> in He (referred to as SF<sub>6</sub> throughout). The 99.999 % purity H<sub>2</sub> was introduced via a dedicated MFC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Reaction products</title>
      <p id="d2e2714">To determine the most abundant rection products for Ca and Sr, product ion scans (PIS) were conducted. The first quadrupole (Q1) was set to a mass-to-charge ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 44 or 88, respectively, and Q2 scanned across the mass range with mass shifts of 0 to 150 amu. When using SF<sub>6</sub>, both with and without the addition of H<sub>2</sub>, the predominant reaction products were CaF and SrF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amu mass shift; Fig. 1a). For reactions with N<sub>2</sub>O plus H<sub>2</sub>, hydroxide (OH) product ions were most abundant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amu mass shift; Fig. 1b). Thus, based on the PIS results, the highest abundant reaction products of Ca<sup>19</sup>F, Sr<sup>19</sup>F, Ca<sup>17</sup>OH and Sr<sup>17</sup>OH were used in further analysis. For both Ca and Sr, measurable amounts of hydrides and oxides were also present. For Ca, heavier Ca(H<sub>2</sub>O)OH and Ca(H<sub>2</sub>O)F were also detected. These H<sub>2</sub>O bearing reaction products may have been caused by a contaminant (e.g. air or moisture) in the H<sub>2</sub> gas lines, as these occurred without the deliberate addition of oxygen i.e. with SF<sub>6</sub>. Additional gas line flushing is recommended to reduce the production of these molecules.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2870">Product ion scans for <sup>44</sup>Ca <bold>(a)</bold> and <sup>88</sup>Sr <bold>(b)</bold> using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gases, measured on NIST SRM 610 glass and plotted to show reaction products greater than 100 cps only. Major reaction product ions that were chosen for Sr and Ca analysis in further experiments are highlighted in bold. Circled in orange are the SF<sub>6</sub> gas breakdown products (SF<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2973">For SF<sub>6</sub>, the PIS also showed the SF<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> breakdown products at masses 51, 70, 89, 108 and 127 amu (Fig. 1). These reaction products occur across 3 masses in each experiment, reflecting the isotopic proportions of S. As these product ions are created within the reaction cell from the breakdown of the SF<sub>6</sub> reaction gas itself, their occurrence is independent of the ions that passes through Q1 into the reaction cell. For example, the SF<sub>6</sub> reaction products were also measurable at the same rates when Q1 was set to 3 amu, meaning that no ions were entering the reaction cell. For K-Ca and Rb-Sr isotopic analysis, these products do not affect the measurements; however, they can have implications for the range of trace elements monitored in the same analysis; e.g. <sup>51</sup>V, <sup>53</sup>Cr, <sup>89</sup>Y, and <sup>90</sup>Zr will all have elevated backgrounds when SF<sub>6</sub> is used as the reaction gas.</p>
      <p id="d2e3059">The isotopes measured with dwell times (ms) in brackets, were: <sup>27</sup>Al (5), <sup>36+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ar (20), <sup>39</sup>K (10), <sup>39+<italic>X</italic></sup>K (20), <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca (50), <sup>42+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca (50), <sup>43+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca (50),<sup>44+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca (100), <sup>85</sup>Rb (20), <sup>86+<italic>X</italic></sup>Sr (50), and <sup>87+<italic>X</italic></sup>Sr (50). For the reacted isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a mass shift of either 19 (e.g. <sup>40</sup>Ca<sup>19</sup>F) when using SF<sub>6</sub> reaction gas or 17 (e.g. <sup>40</sup>Ca<sup>17</sup>OH) when using the N<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> mixture. The presence of unreacted <sup>40</sup>Ca and <sup>87</sup>Sr prevents the direct measurement of the parent isotopes, so <sup>39</sup>K and <sup>85</sup>Rb were measured as proxies for <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>87</sup>Rb respectively and calculated assuming natural isotopic abundance (Hogmalm et al., 2017; Redaa et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Analysis of mass 40 and reaction gas optimisation</title>
      <p id="d2e3337">Measurement of <sup>40</sup>Ca, the major Ca isotope (96.9 % abundance), is complicated by the presence of the major isotope of Ar (99.6 % abundance), as well as the parent <sup>40</sup>K. Since <sup>40</sup>Ar<sup>+</sup> is the most abundant ion produced in the Ar burning ICP, the total number of ions passing through Q1 (set at 40 amu) and entering the reaction cell is very large, greater than the maximum detectable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cps. The total ion load is thus likely to significantly exceed the maximum capacity of the reaction cell in terms of ensuring efficient and controlled reactions.</p>
      <p id="d2e3391">Product ion scans were recorded at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40, both in the gas background (<sup>40</sup>Ar) and while ablating NIST SRM 610 glass (<sup>40</sup>Ar and <sup>40</sup>Ca). Figure 2 illustrates the additional complexity of measuring <sup>40</sup>Ca compared to the measurement of <sup>44</sup>Ca. There are four major observations of note. Firstly, the enhancement of the reaction gas breakdown product ions e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cps for SF<sup>+</sup> when Q1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 (Fig. 2), compared to 2000 cps at Q1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (Fig. 1a).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3488">Gas background product ion scans (no sample ablation) with Q1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 amu using four different reaction gas mixtures: N<sub>2</sub>O only (light blue), N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> (dark blue), SF<sub>6</sub> only (orange) and SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> (red). The labelled high cps peaks represent the breakdown of the reaction gases themselves, and where Ca reaction products of interest would be measured at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 and 59.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3586">Secondly, N<sub>2</sub>O product ions, such as N<sub>2</sub>O-N<sub>2</sub>O<sup>+</sup> and N<sub>2</sub>OH-N<sub>2</sub>O<sup>+</sup>, were detected on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 62 and 63 but were not detected at other Q1 masses (Fig. 1). This is likely due to the high density of Ar<sup>+</sup>, reacting with and breaking down the reaction gasses. Thirdly, N<sub>2</sub>O and SF<sub>6</sub> can attenuate Ar<sup>+</sup> ions via charge transfer reactions, although less effectively than H<sub>2</sub>. The on-mass 40 amu measurement remains significant for reactions without H<sub>2</sub> (c. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cps with SF<sub>6</sub> and c. 10<sup>8</sup> cps with N<sub>2</sub>O; Fig. 2); however, this is lower compared to when no reaction gasses are used (above the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cps). As predicted, the addition of H<sub>2</sub> to both SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O reduced the detectable 40 amu to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cps. Fourthly, a high gas background was observed on all Q2 masses when Q1 was set to 40 amu, indicated with the dashed line in Fig. 2. The addition of H<sub>2</sub> to SF<sub>6</sub> had little effect on this background (red and orange lines, Fig. 2), whereas its addition to N<sub>2</sub>O significantly reduced the background (light and dark blue lines, Fig. 2). Therefore, the high background is likely to be caused by the presence of Ar<sup>+</sup> ions, as opposed to the reactive H<sup>+</sup> ions generated from the Ar-H<sub>2</sub> charge transfer reaction. This background can be significant at the CaF and CaOH reaction product masses, 57 and 59 amu (highest values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>4</sup> cps in the example below), and subsequent testing detailed below aimed to optimise the reaction gas flow rates to minimise this background. Ultimately, sensitivity is a function of signal to background ratio, thus background signals need to be carefully monitored prior to analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e3883">The reaction gas flow rates and proportions between the gases (SF<sub>6</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub>) were systematically varied to determine their effect on <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca reaction products. Count rates on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Q1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40, Q2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57) and 59 (Q1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40, Q2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59) were measured in the gas background and when ablating NIST610 to produce CaOH and CaF reaction products. The signal to background ratios were compared to determine the optimal flow rates for each reaction gas (Fig. 3).</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3974">Signal (SG) and background (BG) cps at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59 (CaF) for the optimisation of SF<sub>6</sub> gas flow rate. Units in % of total flow of the mass flow controller, where 30 % is a flow of 0.57 mL min<sup>−1</sup> and 40 % is 0.77 mL min<sup>−1</sup>. Experiment 1 (blue symbols) is SF<sub>6</sub> gas only and experiment 2 (green symbols) is SF<sub>6</sub> with 2 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4068">As the SF<sub>6</sub> flow rate was increased from an initial rate of 20 % (0.38 mL min<sup>−1</sup>), the sensitivity of CaF increased to a plateau at 30 % for SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> (0.57 mL min<sup>−1</sup> SF<sub>6</sub>, 2 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>) and 40 % for SF<sub>6</sub> only (0.77 mL min<sup>−1</sup>), while the background decreased slightly or was stable (Fig. 3). These sensitivity plateaus occur at the flow rates that give the maximum reaction efficiency. Higher gas flow rates eventually attenuate the signal due to increased collisions in the cell. While the addition of SF<sub>6</sub> only can resolve the Ar interference on <sup>40</sup>Ca (no <sup>40</sup>ArF reaction), the SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> mixture results in slightly higher sensitivity for <sup>40</sup>Ca<sup>19</sup>F and, more importantly, a significantly lower background (signal to background ratio increases from 3650 to 5770, Fig. 3).</p>
      <p id="d2e4254">Signal and background data was collected for a range of N<sub>2</sub>O flow rates, from 0.16 to 0.32 mL min<sup>−1</sup> (15 %–30 %) using 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> (Fig. 4a). The sensitivity dropped with increasing N<sub>2</sub>O flow rate, resulting in a lower signal to background ratio. The same relationship was observed when using higher H<sub>2</sub> flow rates (e.g. 10 mL min<sup>−1</sup>). Figure 4b presents cps data using 0.16 mL min<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O (15 %) and varying the H<sub>2</sub> flow from 5–10 mL min<sup>−1</sup> (with 10 mL min<sup>−1</sup> being the highest flow rate achievable on the mass-flow controller). Signal sensitivity and background both decreased with increasing H<sub>2</sub> gas flow, however, the highest signal to background ratio was achieved using a maximum of 10 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>. The higher H<sub>2</sub> gas flow rates not only effect <sup>40</sup>Ca sensitivity, but they also effect the sensitivity of the minor <sup>44</sup>Ca, where higher sensitivity is beneficial to improve overall uncertainty of the measured ratios. The two conditions of 0.16 mL min<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O and 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> (N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> low H<sub>2</sub>), and 0.16 mL min<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O and 10 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> (N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> high H<sub>2</sub>), were used for further testing of mineral samples. The 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> flow rate is a compromise in signal to background ratios, while maintaining higher signal sensitivity.</p><fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4603">Signal (SG) and background (BG) cps at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 (CaOH) for the optimisation of N<sub>2</sub>O and H<sub>2</sub> gas flow rates. <bold>(a)</bold> Using 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> and varying the N<sub>2</sub>O flow from 15 % to 30 % (0.16 to 0.32 mL min<sup>−1</sup>). <bold>(b)</bold> Using 15 % N<sub>2</sub>O (0.16 mL min<sup>−1</sup>) and varying the H<sub>2</sub> flow from 5–10 mL min<sup>−1</sup>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Calibration strategies</title>
      <p id="d2e4742">Isotopic ratios were calibrated using a glass reference material, manufactured at the Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, Adelaide University. The glasses were made from SiO<sub>2</sub>-Na<sub>2</sub>O-(BaO)-MgO matrix doped with known quantities of K, Ca, Sr and Rb (referred to as SNBM-1 and SNM-1). The raw materials were ball-milled for 1 h to achieve thorough mixing and then loaded into a platinum crucible. The batch materials were melted at 1500 °C for 2 h and cast into a brass mould. On the following day, the sample was annealed at 520 °C for 2 h to relieve internal stress. To improve the homogeneity of the glass, the initial glass was powdered and re-melted at 1500 °C for 2 h, followed by the same casting and annealing steps as before.</p>
      <p id="d2e4763">The synthetic glasses were used in preference to the more commonly used high-Ca glasses: NIST SRM 610 (8.15 wt % Ca) and BCR-2G (5.05 wt % Ca), to avoid Ca contamination from remobilisation of previously ablated material in the interface tubing (i.e. false signal). The manufactured glasses also enabled customisation of the K, Rb, Sr and Ca concentrations to match the electron multiplier detector modes (pulse or analog counting) between reference materials and samples.</p>
      <p id="d2e4766">Initial testing used the SNBM-1 glass with a SiO<sub>2</sub>-Na<sub>2</sub>O-BaO-MgO matrix doped with 2000 ppm K and Rb, and 500 ppm Ca and Sr (data Tables S3, S4, S6 and S8). However, ablating this glass with 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m spot size and 5 Hz repetition rate resulted in <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca being measured in analog mode, while the samples were all in pulse mode. Note that <sup>44+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca was always measured in pulse mode because the natural abundance ratio between <sup>44</sup>Ca and <sup>40</sup>Ca is c.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Reducing the laser beam size or repetition rate to lower the <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca signal into pulse mode caused an unfavourable reduction in precision of the ratios for the mineral samples due to lower sensitivity of the minor <sup>44+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca isotope. The MDC phlogopite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">519</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> 0.72607; Hogmalm et al., 2017; Morteani et al., 2013; Redaa et al., 2021) was used as the mineral-matched reference material to correct for matrix-dependent mass bias on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca (Glorie et al., 2024a) via Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M422" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Corrected</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Corrected</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where subscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denoted the measured isotopic ratio of the sample corrected to SNBM-1 glass, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference age of MDC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the raw measured date (Ma) calculated from the inverse isochron of the ratios corrected to SNBM-1 glass. Decay constants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3972</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5305</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used for the Rb-Sr and K-Ca systems, respectively (Renne et al., 2011; Villa et al., 2015). The correction to the matrix matched age reference material (MDC) was calculated in Excel.</p>
      <p id="d2e5220">The <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca signal was collected in pulse mode in MDC, compared to analog in the SNBM-1 glass. As the <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca in all other samples were measured in pulse mode, correcting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios to MDC also incorporated a pulse-analog component to the correction. The pulse and analog detector modes have been observed to drift relative to each other in some Rb-Sr sessions (Glorie et al., 2024a). To assess this, the SNBM-1 glass (analog) and MDC phlogopite (pulse) were both measured every 20–30 analyses throughout each analytical session. After correction to the SNBM-1 glass, no residual time-dependent drift was apparent in the MDC isochrons (see data tables in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e5269">The Kola phlogopite was used to calculate a pulse-analog correction for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca using the offset between the calculated, unanchored <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca intercept and the expected ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Russell et al., 1978). Kola was used in preference to MDC for the pulse-analog correction for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca as it gave higher variability in measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios between analyses, leading to more robust isochron regression and calculated initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratio. For the initial method validation, the pulse-analog correction was robust enough for comparative testing to optimise the reaction gas flows; however, it is not recommended as a routine protocol due to differences in mass-bias drift between pulse and analog modes (Glorie et al., 2024b).</p>
      <p id="d2e5370">A second glass, SNM-1, was made to address the pulse-analog issues identified in the initial testing. It had a SiO<sub>2</sub>-Na<sub>2</sub>O-MgO matrix doped with 2000 ppm K, 1000 ppm Rb, 100 ppm Ca and 500 ppm Sr. These concentrations were chosen such that <sup>39</sup>K and <sup>85</sup>Rb were measured in analog detector mode and <sup>40+<italic>X</italic></sup>Ca and <sup>87+<italic>X</italic></sup>Sr were measured in pulse mode at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m spot size. This second glass better matched the detector mode in the samples to avoid the need for additional pulse-analog correction and is recommended for all future analyses. Analyses of the micas were repeated with the two most promising reaction gas mixtures (SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> low H<sub>2</sub>, data Tables S5 and S7) using the SNM-1 glass to validate the initial data sets without requiring an additional pulse-analog correction.</p>
      <p id="d2e5497">The synthetic glasses were used to correct for instrument drift, down-hole fractionation and matrix independent mass-bias using the LADR data processing software (Norris and Danyushevsky, 2018). The reference values used for normalisation of the measured isotopic ratios for both glasses were calculated from the nominal concentrations, assuming natural isotopic abundances and molar proportions.</p>
      <p id="d2e5500">All uncertainties are reported at the 95 % confidence interval. The individual measurement uncertainties include the excess scatter of the ratios measured in the glass reference material as calculated in LADR. The MDC age correction factor was applied to the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios, and the calculated MDC age uncertainty (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for K–Ca and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for Rb–Sr) was propagated onto the uncertainty of the sample isochron dates. The long-term reproducibility of Rb–Sr dates at the Adelaide Microscopy isotope facility is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, which is similar to 1.6 % reported in Olierook et al. (2026), and 1.4 % in Rösel and Zack (2022). This additional systematic uncertainty was propagated onto the final dates: 1.5 % for Rb-Sr and a more conservative 2 % for K–Ca as a realistic estimate, in the absence of long-term data.</p>
      <p id="d2e5567">Either the SNBM-1 or SNB-1 glass was used as the primary refence material for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratios without further correction, as isotopic ratios of the same element are not subject to matrix-dependent fractionation (Redaa et al., 2021; Gorojovsky and Alard, 2020) and all Sr isotope measurements were in pulse detector mode.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Data treatment</title>
      <p id="d2e5596">The low-Ca glasses (SNBM-1 and SNM-1) were used in preference to high-Ca NIST610, to minimise the potential for carry over of Ca between reference glasses and samples. However, contamination was still seen in some ablation signals either from the remobilisation of previously ablated material (predominantly affecting the lower sensitivity isotope <sup>44</sup>Ca) or surface contamination on the samples (predominantly affecting <sup>40</sup>Ca, the most abundant common Ca isotope). This was especially apparent in low-Ca micas and for the initial data sets. To remove surface contamination, the samples were repolished and cleaned using distilled water, and 5–10 pre-ablation shots were used to clean the surface prior to sample ablation. During data processing signals were cropped where possible to avoid Ca spikes and surface contamination. Outlier analyses with high <sup>44</sup>Ca giving a young age bias, were excluded from the isochrons. These contamination issues were most prevalent in the initial data sets (Tables S4 and S6) and minimised in the later after sample cleaning (Tables S5 and S7). Example ablation signals are provided in Supplement Figures.</p>
      <p id="d2e5626">A relatively long counting time was used for the low abundance <sup>44</sup>Ca, to reduce the impact of high uncertainty at low count rates (cps): 100 ms, where the minimum detectable 1 count equates to 10 cps. The signals were also cropped during data processing to avoid any zeros in the <sup>44</sup>Ca signals to ensure accurate uncertainty calculations. Average background subtracted signal sensitivities (cps) are provided in Supplement Data tables.</p>
      <p id="d2e5647">All data were plotted as inverse isochrons (plotting parent/daughter versus stable/daughter isotope ratios) to minimise uncertainty correlations and improve data visualisation (Li and Vermeesch, 2021), using isoplotR (Vermeesch, 2018). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr initial ratios used for plotting sample isochrons were either obtained from the literature when known (Table 1) or an assumed value based on the recommendations by Rösel and Zack (2022). A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca initial value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used for plotting all K-Ca isochrons, as the range of naturally occurring Ca isotopic ratios can be considered invariant within the uncertainty of the LA-ICP-MS/MS measurements (Russell et al., 1978). This is a significant benefit of the K–Ca method because it allows direct calculation of dates for every analysis without a need to assume initial ratios.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Down Hole Fractionation</title>
      <p id="d2e5712">Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope ratio pairs have contrasting element volatilities with Rb and K being the more volatile (Jackson, 2008). Hence, down-hole fractionation (DHF) between the elements during ablation is likely and has been described elsewhere for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gorojovsky and Alard, 2020; Redaa et al., 2021; Glorie et al., 2024a). The DHF effects were minimised in this study by using a relatively large laser spot size (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and 5 Hz repetition rate to reduce the depth to diameter ratio of the crater. Nevertheless, DHF was still observed for both isotope pairs (Fig. 5).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5761">Down hole fractionation curves for <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios in the SNM-1 glass, micas and feldspars, starting 5 s after the start of ablation (signal has stabilised by this time). Each line represents an average of between 10–30 individual signals, excluding those displaying the most variable common Ca signals. Contributing individual signals are centred to a value of 1.0 so that the effects of mass bias and drift are removed as per Lloyd et al. (2025). Shaded regions are the model uncertainties at 95 % confidence intervals; however, they are typically less than the width of the plotted lines at this scale. Note the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis scales in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are different to exaggerate the curves and aid visual interpretation. Polylithionite (pln), phlogopite (phl), muscovite (msc), K-feldspar (ksp).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5824">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there is very little difference in DHF between the materials after the first 10 s of ablation, with the exception of Bohus feldspar which shows a more variable average signal curve during the ablation (Fig. 5a, Table S9; Lloyd et al., 2025). The relative differences between materials are more pronounced for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, especially during the first 10 s of ablation (Fig. 5b), with up to 10 % DHF, compared to 5 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The SNM glass, MDC, G17560 and Kola micas all have relatively flat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios which is likely to be representative of laser induced DHF. The more variable profiles primarily reflect variations in common Ca rather than differences in ablation behaviour. This was most pronounced for feldspar, where the fewest number of signals were averaged due to naturally heterogeneous common Ca within the ablation volume of the feldspars, producing more variable average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The main outlier is Högsbo, for which the steeper curve is attributed to minor common Ca contamination on the surface, which potentially penetrated along cleaves into the subsurface. Despite 7 pre-ablation shots, the common Ca signal was highest at the start of each ablation before decaying to a stable level. When pre-ablation shots were recorded, the Ca signal was significantly higher than during the main ablation, compared to major elements which had similar sensitivity, indicating surface contamination of Ca. For both causes of variable common Ca, the most stable part of the signal was selected to calculate dates, although the whole signals are used to generate the ratio curves in Fig. 5. Typically, the first 10 s of ablation was not included in the signal selection to avoid common Ca contamination and to minimise DHF differences between matrices (see Supplement Figures).</p>
      <p id="d2e5888">The SNM-01 glass was used to correct for DHF in the other materials. The average curve for SNM-01 is slightly flatter compared to the micas (Fig. 5), which is likely to under-correct the minerals. However, no residual slope was observed on individual analysis ratios for the minerals within the noise of the signals, and any residual bias is assumed to be corrected as a component of the matrix-match mineral age correction (to MDC phlogopite). In the current absence of data processing software which can use isochronous mineral-matched reference materials to correct DHF directly, the suitability of SNM-01 as a DHF correction material is evaluated in this study. Differences in ablation characteristics between minerals (especially between the MDC mineral-matched reference material and K-feldspars) are likely to become more apparent at smaller spot sizes due to increased differences in DHF curves between matrices.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>K–Ca and Rb–Sr dates of micas and feldspar</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Reaction gas optimisation – micas</title>
      <p id="d2e5906">The MDC phlogopite was used as the matrix-matched reference material for all other samples analysed. Typical isochrons are shown in Fig. 6 for K–Ca and Rb–Sr (see Supplement Tables S3–8 for isochrons for all gas mixtures). There was a much larger spread in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr, despite the data points being collected from the same ablation volumes. The bimodal distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios correlates with location on the MDC crystal. It reflects common-Ca heterogeneity within the mica, while the common-Sr is relatively homogeneous (Table 1). Therefore, the natural variation in minor common <sup>44</sup>Ca and <sup>86</sup>Sr is poorly correlated in this phlogopite which suggests that they can substitute differently into the mica structure in contrast to Rb which readily substitutes for K in the I-site in the general mineral formula for micas IM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>□</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>T<sub>4</sub>O<sub>10</sub>A<sub>2</sub> (Rieder et al., 1998). The Ca will also substitute into the high coordination (often 12-fold) interlayer I-site along with K, Na and Rb. However, Sr has a preference for the 8-fold M-site (with Mg, Fe, Mn, Li etc.) but due to its large ionic radius will often be forced in the I-site (Harrison and Lovera, 2014; Tischendorf et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2025). The MDC signals with the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios had stable signals throughout the ablation, indicating <sup>44</sup>Ca is most likely incorporated within the mineral structure, rather than being a product from Ca-bearing mineral micro-inclusions. If Ca and Sr can be hosted differently in the mineral structure, this supports the theory that Ca and Sr can diffuse and be reset under different conditions, leading to potential de-coupling between the Rb–Sr and K–Ca apparent dates (Fletcher et al., 1997).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6059">Representative K–Ca <bold>(a)</bold> and Rb–Sr <bold>(b)</bold> isochrons for MDC using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gasses. Dates are matrix-offset corrected to MDC itself; thus, they are equivalent to the reference age. Date uncertainties are analytical only, and this was propagated onto the date uncertainties of the other samples.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6099">Robins Folly biotite and Högsbo muscovite give accurate dates within uncertainty for both Rb–Sr and K–Ca using three different reaction gas mixtures (Fig. 7, Table S2). The exception is N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> high H<sub>2</sub>, which gave a K–Ca date for Robins Folly that is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % too old. The agreement between the K–Ca and Rb–Sr dates for these micas demonstrates that phlogopite (MDC) is a suitable matrix matched reference material for muscovite, within the uncertainty of the technique. It further demonstrates that the choice of reaction gas, SF<sub>6</sub> or N<sub>2</sub>O, has little effect on the accuracy. The least consistency between isotope systems was obtained when using a N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> high H<sub>2</sub> flow. The highest sensitivity and highest signal to background ratio was achieved for reacted <sup>40</sup>Ca with SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> (Figs. 3, 8). The highest Sr sensitivity was achieved using either SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> low H<sub>2</sub>. Using SF<sub>6</sub> only, or too high H<sub>2</sub> flow rate with N<sub>2</sub>O, results in significantly lower sensitivity. The enhanced sensitivity with SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> is considered advantageous for producing the best theoretical precision of individual isotope ratio measurements due to improved counting statistics on the lowest abundance isotope <sup>44</sup>Ca.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e6332"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Comparison in calculated K–Ca and Rb–Sr dates between the four reaction gas experiments for Robins Folly and Högsbo muscovites. Uncertainty bars represent 2SE propagated uncertainties. The solid horizontal line represents expected age, long and short dashed horizontal lines are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and 5 % uncertainty of the expected age, respectively. Indicative K–Ca <bold>(c, d)</bold> and Rb–Sr <bold>(e, f)</bold> isochrons using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas, with matrix matched age correction to MDC phlogopite. Analytical and total systematic age uncertainties are both reported with the isochrons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e6399">Sensitivity of <sup>40</sup>Ca<sup>19</sup>F or <sup>40</sup>Ca<sup>17</sup>OH, and <sup>88</sup>Sr<sup>19</sup>F or <sup>88</sup>Sr<sup>17</sup>OH, measured on SNMB-1 glass, plotted relative to the SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas mixture.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6506">The Rb–Sr dates for Kola are slightly older than expected, but within 3 % when using SF<sub>6</sub> with or without H<sub>2</sub> (Fig. 9a). However, the K-Ca ages for Kola, corrected to MDC, are highly variable with poor reproducibility between repeat sessions with both SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O reaction gases, and apparent dates tending up to ca. 6 % older than Rb–Sr dates (Fig. 9a). Likewise, G17560 K–Ca dates also show poor reproducibility (Fig. 10a), but with almost identical relative offsets as Kola. When G17560 is corrected against Kola, rather than MDC (Fig. 10b), the measured K–Ca dates are consistent within uncertainty for all reaction gas combinations tested, and K–Ca dates are slightly younger than the Rb–Sr dates. These two micas have the lowest common Ca of the micas analysed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm), suggesting a potential bias or interference effecting the low abundance <sup>44</sup>Ca. Increasing the dwell time further for <sup>44</sup>Ca for future analyses may help to improve counting statistics and bias at low levels. This suggests that matching the Ca concentration between the matrix-matched correction material and the samples is important for low Ca micas.</p>

      <fig id="F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e6576"><bold>(a)</bold> Comparison in calculated K–Ca and Rb–Sr dates between the four reaction gas experiments for Kola phlogopite. Uncertainty bars represent 2SE propagated uncertainties. Solid horizontal line represents expected age, long and short dashed horizontal lines are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and 5 % uncertainty of the expected age, respectively. Indicative K–Ca <bold>(b)</bold> and Rb–Sr <bold>(c)</bold> isochrons using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas, with matrix matched age correction to MDC phlogopite. Analytical and total systematic age uncertainties are reported with the isochrons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e6644"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Comparison in calculated K–Ca and Rb–Sr dates between the four reaction gas experiments for G17560 polylithionite normalised to MDC <bold>(a)</bold> and Kola <bold>(b)</bold>. Uncertainty bars represent 2SE propagated uncertainties. Dashed horizontal lines indicate the expected age range from the region. Indicative K–Ca <bold>(c)</bold> and Rb–Sr <bold>(d)</bold> isochrons using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas, with matrix matched age correction to Kola phlogopite. Analytical and total systematic age uncertainties are reported with the isochrons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Feldspars</title>
      <p id="d2e6713">The Bohus and FK-N feldspars were analysed using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> low H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas mixtures (Fig. 11). The MDC-corrected Rb–Sr and K–Ca dates are accurate within uncertainty for Bohus feldspar (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">921</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">924</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma, respectively using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub>), indicating no significant matrix bias between mica and felspars under the laser conditions used. In contrast, the K–Ca dates for FK-N were systematically younger than the Rb–Sr dates despite the large uncertainties (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">437</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">515</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma, respectively using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub>), indicating decoupling between the isotope systems. This younger K–Ca date could represent hydrothermal events recorded in the region (458–422 Ma, rutile U-Pb ages; Amal Dev and Tomson, 2024) while the Rb–Sr date can be interpreted as a cooling age after the original emplacement of the granites during the late stages of the Pan African Orogeny (870–550 Ma; Kröner and Stern, 2005).</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e6868"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Comparison in calculated K–Ca and Rb–Sr dates between the SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> low H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas experiments for Bohus and FK-N feldspars. Uncertainty bars represent 2SE propagated uncertainties. Solid horizontal line represents expected age, dashed horizontal lines are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of expected age. Indicative K–Ca <bold>(c, d)</bold> and Rb–Sr <bold>(e, f)</bold> isochrons using SF<sub>6</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub> reaction gas, with matrix matched age correction to MDC phlogopite. Analytical and total systematic age uncertainties are reported with the isochrons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/8/661/2026/gchron-8-661-2026-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6984">For both feldspars, the K–Ca date uncertainties are generally larger than the corresponding Rb–Sr date, due to the K–Ca system being less radiogenic (Fig. 11). Compared to the micas analysed, the feldspars are also significantly less radiogenic for both K–Ca and Rb–Sr. Multiple grains of FK-N and Bohus were mounted and tested for Ca concentration prior to analysis, and the lowest Ca grain was used for K-Ca measurements. These feldspars were selected due to their relatively low common Ca content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm). Feldspars with higher Ca would be more challenging to analyse within 5 % analytical precision on a quadrupole ICP-MS/MS, and a MC-ICP-MS/MS may be advantageous for more precise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca measurements.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Current Limitations and Future Direction</title>
      <p id="d2e7023">The accuracy of the current technique is limited by the reference K–Ca age of the matrix matched reference material. In this study, we assume MDC has the same K–Ca age as reported for Rb–Sr. This proves to be valid in accurately reproducing the ages of Robins Folly and Högsbo muscovites within 2 %–3 % uncertainty. However, independent validation of the K–Ca age would be required for the technique to develop further and to assess accuracy within 1 %–2 % uncertainty, comparable to the in-situ Rb–Sr method. Recent work by Olierook et al. (2026) has provided new Ar–Ar and Rb–Sr dates for a range of commonly used mica reference materials, and further characterisation of these micas for K–Ca would also be beneficial to the analytical community.</p>
      <p id="d2e7026">The low concentrations of common Ca, typical in micas, mean the analyses can be easily compromised by Ca contamination. This can occur via remobilisation of previously ablated particulates in the interface tubing, especially after ablation of high Ca glasses such as NIST SRM 610 and BCR-2G, or from surface contamination during sample preparation and polishing. The impact of contamination was minimised by using 5–10 pre-ablation shots prior to the main analysis, and by cleaning the samples with distilled water in an ultra-sonic bath to remove particulates inside past ablation craters and/or crystal defects. The effects of contamination can be seen as spiky signals, especially for the minor <sup>44</sup>Ca, which leads to a young age bias in contaminated data points (higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratios). It may also, in part, explain the poor reproducibility of K–Ca dates between sessions (using the same reaction gas) for the highly radiogenic micas Kola and G17560 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm common Ca). Hence, sample cleaning and pre-ablation are paramount for accurate K–Ca dates.</p>
      <p id="d2e7065">There is also an upper limit of allowable Ca concentrations to resolve the amount of radiogenic <sup>40</sup>Ca ingrowth from the common Ca. For FK-N feldspar, which is approximately 500 Ma and contains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm total K, the measured <sup>40</sup>Ca was only 1–5 % radiogenic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02015–0.02099). Analysis using MC-ICP-MS/MS would improve the uncertainty on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratio, enabling improved age precision and/or the ability to date younger Ca-bearing minerals such as feldspars. However, analysing both Rb–Sr and K–Ca simultaneously is currently only possible on a quadrupole ICP-MS/MS. An additional consideration is the pulse-analog transition of the electron multiplier detectors, which in this study was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mcps, equivalent to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm total Ca.</p>
      <p id="d2e7158">One of the major advantages of quadrupole ICP-MS/MS is the ability to measure a wide range of isotopic masses in one analysis, enabling simultaneous Rb–Sr, K–Ca and trace element analyses. However, when using SF<sub>6</sub> as the reaction gas, there are some limitations as to the additional trace element isotopes than can be measured due to isobaric interferences from reaction gas breakdown products. Specifically causing high backgrounds of: SF on <sup>51</sup>V, <sup>52</sup>Cr and <sup>53</sup>Cr, and SF<sub>3</sub> on <sup>89</sup>Y, <sup>90</sup>Zr and <sup>91</sup>Zr. As these interferences are created within the reaction cell, they cannot be avoided. Thus, care is needed for isotope selection and interpretation of trace element data when using SF<sub>6</sub>as reaction gas.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e7253">This study compared SF<sub>6</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O combined with H<sub>2</sub> as reaction gasses for simultaneous Rb–Sr and K–Ca analysis in micas and feldspars. Both Sr and Ca react efficiently to form either F or OH reaction products, enabling analysis free from parent isotope isobaric interference (<sup>40</sup>K and <sup>87</sup>Rb). The addition of H<sub>2</sub> is highly efficient in minimising the contribution from <sup>40</sup>Ar and reducing the backgrounds created from the high ion load in the reaction cell when targeting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40. The gas combinations of SF<sub>6</sub> only, SF<sub>6</sub> plus H<sub>2</sub> or N<sub>2</sub>O plus 7 mL min<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub> were found to produce accurate data for micas within 2 % and K-feldspars to within 5 %. However, the combination of SF<sub>6</sub> plus H<sub>2</sub> gave the highest sensitivity and best signal to noise ratio. This is advantageous for achieving the best precision, especially for young micas or those with low common-Ca concentration.</p>
      <p id="d2e7408">We show that the simultaneous dating using both K–Ca and Rb–Sr isotope systems is achievable from the same ablation volume for both mica and feldspars. This can be especially beneficial for small grains and/or detrital minerals where sample material is limited. Furthermore, in contrast to the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio, the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca ratio is observed to be invariable over geological timescales. Thus, single spot K–Ca dates can be determined from anchored 2-point isochrons (similar to the Lu–Hf system), opening opportunities for detrital geochronology. Mineral dating via quadrupole LA-ICP-MS/MS is not only advantageous for simultaneous measurement of both isotope systems, but it is also best suited for low Ca-bearing phases (5–300 ppm). Analysing this concentration range compliments TIMS and MC-ICP-MS/MS techniques, which achieve higher precision for high Sr and Ca bearing, low radiogenic phases.</p>
      <p id="d2e7445">The potential for decoupling between the isotope systems has been demonstrated with the FK-N feldspar from the Madras region, where the younger K–Ca date is likely to represent regional hydrothermal alteration, compared to the Rb–Sr date which has retained the crystallisation age of the granite. This newly developed technique, where isotope decoupling can be identified, will have wide usage for understanding cooling and alteration processes in micas and feldspars, and increase knowledge of element diffusivity in these minerals.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7452">All datasets from this study are included in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e7455">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-8-661-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-8-661-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7464">S. E. Gilbert: Conceptualisation, data curation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, validation, visualisation, writing – original, writing – review and editing.</p>

      <p id="d2e7467">S. Glorie: Conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing – review and editing.</p>

      <p id="d2e7470">J. Lloyd: Conceptualisation, methodology, visualisation, writing – review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7476">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7482">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7488">We acknowledge and pay respects to the Kaurna People, the traditional custodians whose ancestral lands Adelaide University is built on and where the research was conducted. The authors would like to acknowledge the technical expertise of the fibre optics manufacturing team at the Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, Adelaide University, especially to Dr. Mingze Yang for producing the reference material glasses. Thank you to Thomas Zack and Delia Rösel for providing the Bohus and FK-N feldspar materials, and to both anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback to improve the manuscript. Adelaide Microscopy, Adelaide University is a Microscopy Australia (ROR: 042mm0k03) facility enabled by NCRIS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7493">This project was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (grant no. DP260104272).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7499">This paper was edited by Daniela Rubatto and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Amal Dev, J. and Tomson, J. K.: U-Pb geochronology of rutiles from Southern granulite Terrane, India: Implications for the cooling and exhumation of East Gondwanan terranes, Precambrian Res., 407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107408</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Amelin, Y. and Zaitsev, A. N.: Precise geochronology of phoscorites and carbonatites: The critical role of U-series disequilibrium in age interpretations, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 2399–2419, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Antonelli, M. A. and Simon, J. I.: Calcium isotopes in high-temperature terrestrial processes, Chem. Geol., 548, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119651</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Bayanova, T. B.: Baddeleyite: A Promising Geochronometer for Alkaline and Basic Magmatism, Petrology, 14, 187–200, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brown, D. A., Simpson, A., Hand, M., Morrissey, L. J., Gilbert, S., Tamblyn, R., and Glorie, S.: Laser-ablation Lu-Hf dating reveals Laurentian garnet in subducted rocks from southern Australia, Geology, 50, 837–842, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/g49784.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/g49784.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Craig, G., Wehrs, H., Bevan, D. G., Pfeifer, M., Lewis, J., Coath, C. D., Elliott, T., Huang, C., Lloyd, N. S., and Schwieters, J. B.: Project Vienna: A Novel Precell Mass Filter for Collision/Reaction Cell MC-ICPMS/MS, Anal. Chem., 93, 10519–10527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01475</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Dauphas, N., Hopp, T., Craig, G., Zhang, Z. J., Valdes, M. C., Heck, P. R., Charlier, B. L. A., Bell, E. A., Harrison, T. M., Davis, A. M., Dussubieux, L., Williams, P. R., Krawczynski, M. J., Bouman, C., Lloyd, N. S., Tollstrup, D., and Schwieters, J. B.: In situ 87Rb–87Sr analyses of terrestrial and extraterrestrial samples by LA-MC-ICP-MS/MS with double Wien filter and collision cell technologies, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 37, 2420–2441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ja00135g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d2ja00135g</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> DePaolo, D. J.: Calcium Isotopic Variations Produced by Biological, Kinetic, Radiogenic and Nucleosynthetic Processes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 55, 255–288, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Eiden, G. C., Barinaga, C. J., and Koppenaal, D. W.: Selective Removal of Plasma Matrix Ions in Plasma Source Mass Spectrometry, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 11, 317–322, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Eliasson, T. and Schöberg, H.: U-Pb dating of the post-kinematic Sveconorwegian (Grenvillian) Bohus granite, SW Sweden: evidence of restitic zircon, Precambrian Res., 51, 337–350, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Farkaš, J.: Calcium Isotopes, in: Encyclopedia of Geochemistry, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39193-9_237-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-39193-9_237-1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Fletcher, I. R., McNaughton, N. J., Pidgeon, R. T., and Rosman, K. J. R.: Sequential closure of K–Ca and Rb–Sr isotopic systems in Archaean micas, Chem. Geol., 138, 289–301, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gilbert, S. E., Danyushevsky, L. V., Rodemann, T., Shimizu, N., Gurenko, A., Meffre, S., Thomas, H., Large, R. R., and Death, D.: Optimisation of laser parameters for the analysis of sulphur isotopes in sulphide minerals by laser ablation ICP-MS, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 29, 1042–1051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ja00011k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c4ja00011k</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gilbert, S. E., Glorie, S., and Zack, T.: In situ beta decay dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: applications, in: Methods and Applications of Geochronology, Elsevier, 243–295, ISBN 978-0-443-18803-9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00005-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00005-5</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Glorie, S., Mulder, J., Hand, M., Fabris, A., Simpson, A., and Gilbert, S.: Laser ablation (in situ) Lu-Hf dating of magmatic fluorite and hydrothermal fluorite-bearing veins, Geosci. Front., 14, 101629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101629" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101629</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Glorie, S., Gilbert, S. E., Hand, M., and Lloyd, J. C.: Calibration methods for laser ablation Rb–Sr geochronology: comparisons and recommendation based on NIST glass and natural reference materials, Geochronology, 6, 21–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Glorie, S., Simpson, A., Gilbert, S. E., Hand, M., and Müller, A. B.: Testing the reproducibility of in situ LuHf dating using Lu-rich garnet from the Tørdal pegmatites, southern Norway, Chem. Geol., 653, 122038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122038</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gopalan, K.: Conjunctive K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating of glauconites, Chem. Geol., 247, 119–123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.004</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gorojovsky, L. and Alard, O.: Optimisation of laser and mass spectrometer parameters for the in-situ analysis of Rb/Sr ratios by LA-ICP-MS/MS, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 35, 2322–2336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00308e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d0ja00308e</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Govindaraju, K.: Report (1968–1978) on Two Mica Reference Samples: Biotite Mica-Fe and Phlogopite Mica-Mg, Geostandard. Newslett., 3, 3–24, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Govindaraju, K.: Report (1973–1984) on Two ANRT Geochemical Reference Samples: Granite GS-N and Potash Feldspar FK-N, Geostandard. Newslett., 8, 173–206, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Govindaraju, K.: Working values with confidence limits for twenty-six CRPG, ANRT and IWG-GIT geostandards, Geostandard. Newslett., 19, 1–32, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Harrison, T. M. and Lovera, O. M.: The multi-diffusion domain model: Past, present and future, in: Advances in 40Ar/39Ar Dating: From Archaeology to Planetary Sciences, edited by: Jourdan, F., Mark, D. F., and Verati, C., Geological Society, London, 91–106, ISBN 978-1862393608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP378</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, A., Eisenhauer, A., Gussone, N., Bock, B., Hansen, B. T., and Hagler, T. F.: Measurement of calcium isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>44Ca) using a multicollector TIMS technique, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 220, 385–397, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hogmalm, K. J., Zack, T., Karlsson, A. K. O., Sjöqvist, A. S. L., and Garbe-Schönberg, D.: In situ Rb–Sr and K–Ca dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: an evaluation of N2O and SF6 as reaction gases, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 32, 305–313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ja00362a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c6ja00362a</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hogmalm, K. J., Dahlgren, I., Fridolfsson, I., and Zack, T.: First in situ Re-Os dating of molybdenite by LA-ICP-MS/MS, Miner. Deposita, 54, 821–828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-019-00889-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00126-019-00889-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Jackson, S. E.: Calibration strategies for elemental analysis by LA-ICP-MS, in: Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course, Vancouver, 169–188, ISBN 9780921294498, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Jegal, Y., Zimmermann, C., Reisberg, L., Yeghicheyan, D., Cloquet, C., Peiffert, C., Gerardin, M., Deloule, E., and Mercadier, J.: Characterisation of Reference Materials for in-situ Rb‐Sr dating by LA‐ICP‐MS/MS, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 645–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ggr.12456</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, G. R. T.: Do cooling paths derived from mica Rb-Sr data reflect true cooling paths?, Geology, 25, 907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0907:dcpdfm&gt;2.3.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0907:dcpdfm&gt;2.3.co;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Krasnova, N. Y.: The Kovdor phlogopite deposit, Kola Peninsula, Russia, Can. Mineral., 39, 33–44, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kröner, A. and Stern, R. J.: Pan-African Orogeny, in: Encyclopaedia of Geology, edited by: Selley, R. C., Cocks, L. R. M., and Plimer, I. R., Elsevier, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369396-9/00431-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B0-12-369396-9/00431-7</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Larson, K. P., Shrestha, S., Button, M., Cottle, J. M., and Barnes, C. J.: The Effect of Crystal Orientation on In Situ Rb‐Sr Mica Geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 49, 705–713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ggr.70005</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Laureijs, C. T., Coogan, L. A., and Spence, J.: In-situ Rb-Sr dating of celadonite from altered upper oceanic crust using laser ablation ICP-MS/MS, Chem. Geol., 579, 120339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120339</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Laureijs, C. T., Coogan, L. A., and Spence, J.: Regionally variable timing and duration of celadonite formation in the Troodos lavas (Cyprus) from Rb-Sr age distributions, Chem. Geol., 560, 119995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119995</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, S.-S., Santosh, M., Farkaš, J., Redaa, A., Ganguly, S., Kim, S. W., Zhang, C., Gilbert, S., and Zack, T.: Coupled U-Pb and Rb-Sr laser ablation geochronology trace Archean to Proterozoic crustal evolution in the Dharwar Craton, India, Precambrian Res., 343, 105709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105709" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105709</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Li, Y. and Vermeesch, P.: Short communication: Inverse isochron regression for Re–Os, K–Ca and other chronometers, Geochronology, 3, 415–420, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Liebmann, J., Kirkland, C. L., Kelsey, D. E., Korhonen, F. J., and Rankenburg, K.: Lithological fabric as a proxy for Rb–Sr isotopic complexity, Chem. Geol., 608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121041</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lloyd, J. C., Spandler, C., Gilbert, S. E., and Hasterok, D.: The quantification of down-hole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry, Geochronology, 7, 265–287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-265-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-7-265-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Loyola, C., Farkaš, J., Collins, A. S., Gilbert, S. E., Verdel, C., Löhr, S. C., Brock, G. A., Shields, G. A., Baldermann, A., Redaa, A., Blades, M., Subarkah, D., Bishop, C., Giles, S. M., Christie-Blick, N., and Haines, P. W.: In situ Rb–Sr dating and REE analysis of glauconites and detrital feldspars from the Ediacaran/Cambrian strata: Centralian and Adelaide Superbasins, Australia, Precambrian Res., 427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107851</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Marshall, B. D.: Potassium-calcium decay system, in: Geochemistry. Encyclopaedia of Earth Science, Springer, Dordrecht, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4496-8_260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/1-4020-4496-8_260</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Morteani, G., Kostitsyn, Y. A., Gilg, H. A., Preinfalk, C., and Razakamanana, T.: Geochemistry of phlogopite, diopside, calcite, anhydrite and apatite pegmatites and syenites of southern Madagascar: evidence for crustal silicocarbonatitic (CSC) melt formation in a Panafrican collisional tectonic setting, Int. J. Earth Sci., 102, 627–645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0832-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00531-012-0832-x</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Mortimer, G. E., Cooper, J. A., and James, P. R.: U-Pb and Rb-Sr geochronology and geological evolution of the Harts Range ruby mine area of the Arunta Inlier, Central Australia, Lithos, 20, 445–467, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Nägler, T. F. and Villa, I. M.: In pursuit of the 40K  branching ratios: K-Ca and 39Ar-40Ar dating of gem silicates, Chem. Geol., 169, 5–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00194-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00194-1</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Nebel, O.: Rb–Sr Dating, Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating Methods, Springer, Dordrecht, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6326-5_116-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-007-6326-5_116-1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Norris, A. and Danyushevsky, L.: Towards Estimating the Complete Uncertainty Budget of Quantified Results Measured by LA-ICP-MS, Goldschmidt, Boston, <uri>https://goldschmidtabstracts.info/abstracts/abstractView?id=2018003403</uri> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Olierook, H. K. H., Rankenburg, K., Ulrich, S., Kirkland, C. L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S., McInnes, B. I. A., Prent, A., Gillespie, J., McDonald, B., and Darragh, M.: Resolving multiple geological events using in situ Rb–Sr geochronology: implications for metallogenesis at Tropicana, Western Australia, Geochronology, 2, 283–303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Olierook, H. K. H., Ribeiro, B. V., Liebmann, J., Rankenburg, K., Jourdan, F., Redaa, A., Lloyd, J. C., Belgrano, T. M., Corella Santa Cruz, C. R., Jegal, Y., Mercadier, J., Yu, J., Zametzer, A., Kirkland, C. L., Rohrer, R., Storey, C., Doucet, L. S., Jones, I., Stokes, L., Zack, T., Rösel, D., Hébert, N., Fougerouse, D., Kaempf, J., Datta, P., Hameed, H., Evans, N. J., Roberts, M., Mayers, C., Frew, A., Al Odeh, S., Roche, C. E., Chiaradia, M., Cruz-Uribe, A. M., Collins, A. S., Gilbert, S. E., Farkaš, J., Glorie, S., Karlsson, A., and Kumara, A. S.: Appraisal of eight natural mica reference materials for in situ Rb-Sr geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ggr.70061</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Pandey, B., Krishna, V., Sastry, D., Chabria, T., Mary, K., and Dhanaraju, R.: Pan-African whole rock Rb–Sr isochron ages for the granites and pegmatites of Kullampatti–Suriyamalai area, Salem District, Tamil Nadu, India, VI National Sym. Mass Spectrometry, Ind. Inst. of Petroleum, Dehradun, Abstract, 480–482, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Pedrosa-Soares, A. C., De Campos, C. P., Noce, C., Silva, L. C., Novo, T., Roncato, J., Medeiros, S., Castañeda, C., Queiroga, G., Dantas, E., Dussin, I., and Alkmim, F.: Late Neoproterozoic-Cambrian granitic magmatism in the Araçuaí orogen (Brazil), the Eastern Brazilian Pegmatite Province and related mineral resources, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 350, 25–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/sp350.3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/sp350.3</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Redaa, A., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S., Collins, A. S., Wade, B., Löhr, S., Zack, T., and Garbe-Schönberg, D.: Assessment of elemental fractionation and matrix effects during in situ Rb–Sr dating of phlogopite by LA-ICP-MS/MS: implications for the accuracy and precision of mineral ages, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 36, 322–344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00299b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d0ja00299b</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Redaa, A., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S., Collins, A. S., Löhr, S., Vasegh, D., Forster, M., Blades, M., Zack, T., Giuliani, A., Maas, R., Baldermann, A., Dietzel, M., and Garbe‐Schönberg, D.: Testing Nano‐Powder and Fused‐Glass Mineral Reference Materials for In Situ Rb‐Sr Dating of Glauconite, Phlogopite, Biotite and Feldspar via LA‐ICP‐MS/MS, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 47, 23–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12467" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ggr.12467</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Renne, P. R., Balco, G., Ludwig, K. R., Mundil, R., and Min, K.: Response to the comment by W. H. Schwarz et al. on “Joint determination of 40K decay constants and 40Ar<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40Ar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39Ar geochronology” by P.R. Renne et al. (2010), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 5097–5100, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Rieder, M., Cavazzini, G., D'yakonov, Y. S., Frank-Kamenetskii, V. A., Gottardi, G., Guggenheim, S., Koval, P. W., Müller, G. Neiva, A. M. R., Radoslovich, E. W., Robert, J.-L., Sassi, F. P., Takeda, H., Weiss, Z. and Wones, D. R.: Nomenclature of the Micas, Clay. Clay Miner., 46, 586–595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1998.0460513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1346/CCMN.1998.0460513</ext-link>, 1998</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Romer, R. L. and Smeds, S.-A.: U-Pb columbite ages of pegmatites from Sveconorwegian terranes in southwestern Sweden, Precambrian Res., 76, 15–30, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Rösel, D. and Zack, T.: LA‐ICP‐MS/MS Single‐Spot Rb‐Sr Dating, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ggr.12414</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Russell, W. A., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Tombrella, T. A.: Ca isotope fractionation on the Earth and other solar system materials, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 42, 1075–1090, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, A., Gilbert, S., Tamblyn, R., Hand, M., Spandler, C., Gillespie, J., Nixon, A., and Glorie, S.: In-situ Lu Hf geochronology of garnet, apatite and xenotime by LA ICP MS/MS, Chem. Geol., 577, 120299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120299</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, A., Glorie, S., Hand, M., Spandler, C., and Gilbert, S.: Garnet Lu-Hf speed dating: A novel method to rapidly resolve polymetamorphic histories, Gondwana Res., 121, 215–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.011</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Skiöld, T.: The interpretation of the Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages of late Precambrian rocks in south-western Sweden, Geol. Fören. Stock. För., 98, 3–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897609454335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/11035897609454335</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Subarkah, D., Nixon, A. L., Jimenez, M., Collins, A. S., Blades, M. L., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S. E., Holford, S., and Jarrett, A.: Constraining the geothermal parameters of in situ Rb–Sr dating on Proterozoic shales and their subsequent applications, Geochronology, 4, 577–600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Tamblyn, R., Hand, M., Simpson, A., Gilbert, S., Wade, B., and Glorie, S.: In situ laser ablation Lu–Hf geochronology of garnet across the Western Gneiss Region: campaign-style dating of metamorphism, J. Geol. Soc., 179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/jgs2021-094</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Tamblyn, R., Gilbert, S., Glorie, S., Spandler, C., Simpson, A., Hand, M., Hasterok, D., Ware, B., and Tessalina, S.: Molybdenite Reference Materials for In Situ LA‐ICP‐MS/MS Re‐Os Geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 48, 393–410, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Tillberg, M., Drake, H., Zack, T., Kooijman, E., Whitehouse, M. J., and Astrom, M. E.: In situ Rb-Sr dating of slickenfibres in deep crystalline basement faults, Sci. Rep., 10, 562, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57262-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-57262-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Tillberg, M., Drake, H., Zack, T., Hogmalm, J., Kooijman, E., and Åström, M.: Reconstructing craton‐scale tectonic events via in situ Rb-Sr geochronology of poly-phased vein mineralization, Terra Nova, 33, 502–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ter.12542</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Tischendorf, G., Förster, H.-J., Gottesmann, B., and Rieder, M.: True and brittle micas: composition and solid-solution series, Mineral. Mag., 71, 285–320, 2007.  </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: IsoplotR: a free and open toolbox for geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Villa, I. M., De Bièvre, P., Holden, N. E., and Renne, P. R.: IUPAC-IUGS recommendation on the half-life of 87Rb, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 382–385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.025</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., Alard, O., Lai, Y.-J., Foley, S. F., Liu, Y., Munnikhuis, J., and Wang, Y.: Advances in in-situ Rb-Sr dating using LA-ICP-MS/MS: applications to igneous rocks of all ages and to the identification of unrecognized metamorphic events, Chem. Geol., 610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121073</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zack, T. and Gilbert, S. E.: In situ beta decay dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: Fundamentals and methodology, in: Methods and Applications of Geochronology, Elsevier, 211–241, ISBN 978-0-443-18803-9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00014-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00014-6</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zack, T. and Hogmalm, K. J.: Laser ablation Rb/Sr dating by online chemical separation of Rb and Sr in an oxygen-filled reaction cell, Chem. Geol., 437, 120–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.027</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, J., Chen, H., Xiao, B., Zhu, Y., and Wang, H.: Substitution mechanism controls on compositional variations and spectral responses of white micas in major hydrothermal systems, Appl. Clay Sci., 269, 107762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2025.107762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.clay.2025.107762</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Coupled K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS – reaction gas optimisation and geological applications</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Amal Dev, J. and Tomson, J. K.: U-Pb geochronology of rutiles from Southern granulite Terrane, India: Implications for the cooling and exhumation of East Gondwanan terranes, Precambrian Res., 407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107408</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Amelin, Y. and Zaitsev, A. N.: Precise geochronology of phoscorites and carbonatites: The critical role of U-series disequilibrium in age interpretations, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 2399–2419, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Antonelli, M. A. and Simon, J. I.: Calcium isotopes in high-temperature terrestrial processes, Chem. Geol., 548, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119651</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bayanova, T. B.: Baddeleyite: A Promising Geochronometer for Alkaline and Basic Magmatism, Petrology, 14, 187–200, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brown, D. A., Simpson, A., Hand, M., Morrissey, L. J., Gilbert, S., Tamblyn, R., and Glorie, S.: Laser-ablation Lu-Hf dating reveals Laurentian garnet in subducted rocks from southern Australia, Geology, 50, 837–842, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/g49784.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/g49784.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Craig, G., Wehrs, H., Bevan, D. G., Pfeifer, M., Lewis, J., Coath, C. D., Elliott, T., Huang, C., Lloyd, N. S., and Schwieters, J. B.: Project Vienna: A Novel Precell Mass Filter for Collision/Reaction Cell MC-ICPMS/MS, Anal. Chem., 93, 10519–10527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01475</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dauphas, N., Hopp, T., Craig, G., Zhang, Z. J., Valdes, M. C., Heck, P. R., Charlier, B. L. A., Bell, E. A., Harrison, T. M., Davis, A. M., Dussubieux, L., Williams, P. R., Krawczynski, M. J., Bouman, C., Lloyd, N. S., Tollstrup, D., and Schwieters, J. B.: In situ 87Rb–87Sr analyses of terrestrial and extraterrestrial samples by LA-MC-ICP-MS/MS with double Wien filter and collision cell technologies, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 37, 2420–2441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ja00135g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ja00135g</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
DePaolo, D. J.: Calcium Isotopic Variations Produced by Biological, Kinetic, Radiogenic and Nucleosynthetic Processes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 55, 255–288, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eiden, G. C., Barinaga, C. J., and Koppenaal, D. W.: Selective Removal of Plasma Matrix Ions in Plasma Source Mass Spectrometry, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 11, 317–322, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eliasson, T. and Schöberg, H.: U-Pb dating of the post-kinematic Sveconorwegian (Grenvillian) Bohus granite, SW Sweden: evidence of restitic zircon, Precambrian Res., 51, 337–350, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farkaš, J.: Calcium Isotopes, in: Encyclopedia of Geochemistry, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39193-9_237-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39193-9_237-1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fletcher, I. R., McNaughton, N. J., Pidgeon, R. T., and Rosman, K. J. R.: Sequential closure of K–Ca and Rb–Sr isotopic systems in Archaean micas, Chem. Geol., 138, 289–301, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gilbert, S. E., Danyushevsky, L. V., Rodemann, T., Shimizu, N., Gurenko, A., Meffre, S., Thomas, H., Large, R. R., and Death, D.: Optimisation of laser parameters for the analysis of sulphur isotopes in sulphide minerals by laser ablation ICP-MS, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 29, 1042–1051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ja00011k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ja00011k</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gilbert, S. E., Glorie, S., and Zack, T.: In situ beta decay dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: applications, in: Methods and Applications of Geochronology, Elsevier, 243–295, ISBN 978-0-443-18803-9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00005-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00005-5</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glorie, S., Mulder, J., Hand, M., Fabris, A., Simpson, A., and Gilbert, S.: Laser ablation (in situ) Lu-Hf dating of magmatic fluorite and hydrothermal fluorite-bearing veins, Geosci. Front., 14, 101629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101629" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101629</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glorie, S., Gilbert, S. E., Hand, M., and Lloyd, J. C.: Calibration methods for laser ablation Rb–Sr geochronology: comparisons and recommendation based on NIST glass and natural reference materials, Geochronology, 6, 21–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glorie, S., Simpson, A., Gilbert, S. E., Hand, M., and Müller, A. B.: Testing the reproducibility of in situ LuHf dating using Lu-rich garnet from the Tørdal pegmatites, southern Norway, Chem. Geol., 653, 122038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122038</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gopalan, K.: Conjunctive K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating of glauconites, Chem. Geol., 247, 119–123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.004</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gorojovsky, L. and Alard, O.: Optimisation of laser and mass spectrometer parameters for the in-situ analysis of Rb/Sr ratios by LA-ICP-MS/MS, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 35, 2322–2336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00308e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00308e</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Govindaraju, K.: Report (1968–1978) on Two Mica Reference Samples: Biotite Mica-Fe and Phlogopite Mica-Mg, Geostandard. Newslett., 3, 3–24, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Govindaraju, K.: Report (1973–1984) on Two ANRT Geochemical Reference Samples: Granite GS-N and Potash Feldspar FK-N, Geostandard. Newslett., 8, 173–206, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Govindaraju, K.: Working values with confidence limits for twenty-six CRPG, ANRT and IWG-GIT geostandards, Geostandard. Newslett., 19, 1–32, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harrison, T. M. and Lovera, O. M.: The multi-diffusion domain model: Past, present and future, in: Advances in 40Ar/39Ar Dating: From Archaeology to Planetary Sciences, edited by: Jourdan, F., Mark, D. F., and Verati, C., Geological Society, London, 91–106, ISBN 978-1862393608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP378</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, A., Eisenhauer, A., Gussone, N., Bock, B., Hansen, B. T., and Hagler, T. F.: Measurement of calcium isotopes (<i>δ</i>44Ca) using a multicollector TIMS technique, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 220, 385–397, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hogmalm, K. J., Zack, T., Karlsson, A. K. O., Sjöqvist, A. S. L., and Garbe-Schönberg, D.: In situ Rb–Sr and K–Ca dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: an evaluation of N2O and SF6 as reaction gases, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 32, 305–313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ja00362a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ja00362a</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hogmalm, K. J., Dahlgren, I., Fridolfsson, I., and Zack, T.: First in situ Re-Os dating of molybdenite by LA-ICP-MS/MS, Miner. Deposita, 54, 821–828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-019-00889-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-019-00889-1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, S. E.: Calibration strategies for elemental analysis by LA-ICP-MS, in: Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course, Vancouver, 169–188, ISBN 9780921294498, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jegal, Y., Zimmermann, C., Reisberg, L., Yeghicheyan, D., Cloquet, C., Peiffert, C., Gerardin, M., Deloule, E., and Mercadier, J.: Characterisation of Reference Materials for in-situ Rb‐Sr dating by LA‐ICP‐MS/MS, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 645–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12456</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jenkin, G. R. T.: Do cooling paths derived from mica Rb-Sr data reflect true cooling paths?, Geology, 25, 907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0907:dcpdfm&gt;2.3.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0907:dcpdfm&gt;2.3.co;2</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krasnova, N. Y.: The Kovdor phlogopite deposit, Kola Peninsula, Russia, Can. Mineral., 39, 33–44, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kröner, A. and Stern, R. J.: Pan-African Orogeny, in: Encyclopaedia of Geology, edited by: Selley, R. C., Cocks, L. R. M., and Plimer, I. R., Elsevier, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369396-9/00431-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369396-9/00431-7</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Larson, K. P., Shrestha, S., Button, M., Cottle, J. M., and Barnes, C. J.: The Effect of Crystal Orientation on In Situ Rb‐Sr Mica Geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 49, 705–713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70005</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laureijs, C. T., Coogan, L. A., and Spence, J.: In-situ Rb-Sr dating of celadonite from altered upper oceanic crust using laser ablation ICP-MS/MS, Chem. Geol., 579, 120339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120339</a>, 2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laureijs, C. T., Coogan, L. A., and Spence, J.: Regionally variable timing and duration of celadonite formation in the Troodos lavas (Cyprus) from Rb-Sr age distributions, Chem. Geol., 560, 119995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119995</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, S.-S., Santosh, M., Farkaš, J., Redaa, A., Ganguly, S., Kim, S. W., Zhang, C., Gilbert, S., and Zack, T.: Coupled U-Pb and Rb-Sr laser ablation geochronology trace Archean to Proterozoic crustal evolution in the Dharwar Craton, India, Precambrian Res., 343, 105709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105709" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105709</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y. and Vermeesch, P.: Short communication: Inverse isochron regression for Re–Os, K–Ca and other chronometers, Geochronology, 3, 415–420, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liebmann, J., Kirkland, C. L., Kelsey, D. E., Korhonen, F. J., and Rankenburg, K.: Lithological fabric as a proxy for Rb–Sr isotopic complexity, Chem. Geol., 608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121041</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lloyd, J. C., Spandler, C., Gilbert, S. E., and Hasterok, D.: The quantification of down-hole fractionation for laser ablation mass spectrometry, Geochronology, 7, 265–287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-265-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-265-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Loyola, C., Farkaš, J., Collins, A. S., Gilbert, S. E., Verdel, C., Löhr, S. C., Brock, G. A., Shields, G. A., Baldermann, A., Redaa, A., Blades, M., Subarkah, D., Bishop, C., Giles, S. M., Christie-Blick, N., and Haines, P. W.: In situ Rb–Sr dating and REE analysis of glauconites and detrital feldspars from the Ediacaran/Cambrian strata: Centralian and Adelaide Superbasins, Australia, Precambrian Res., 427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107851</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marshall, B. D.: Potassium-calcium decay system, in: Geochemistry. Encyclopaedia of Earth Science, Springer, Dordrecht, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4496-8_260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4496-8_260</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morteani, G., Kostitsyn, Y. A., Gilg, H. A., Preinfalk, C., and Razakamanana, T.: Geochemistry of phlogopite, diopside, calcite, anhydrite and apatite pegmatites and syenites of southern Madagascar: evidence for crustal silicocarbonatitic (CSC) melt formation in a Panafrican collisional tectonic setting, Int. J. Earth Sci., 102, 627–645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0832-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0832-x</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mortimer, G. E., Cooper, J. A., and James, P. R.: U-Pb and Rb-Sr geochronology and geological evolution of the Harts Range ruby mine area of the Arunta Inlier, Central Australia, Lithos, 20, 445–467, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nägler, T. F. and Villa, I. M.: In pursuit of the 40K  branching ratios: K-Ca and 39Ar-40Ar dating of gem silicates, Chem. Geol., 169, 5–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00194-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00194-1</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nebel, O.: Rb–Sr Dating, Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating Methods, Springer, Dordrecht, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6326-5_116-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6326-5_116-1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Norris, A. and Danyushevsky, L.: Towards Estimating the Complete Uncertainty Budget of Quantified Results Measured by LA-ICP-MS, Goldschmidt, Boston, <a href="https://goldschmidtabstracts.info/abstracts/abstractView?id=2018003403" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Olierook, H. K. H., Rankenburg, K., Ulrich, S., Kirkland, C. L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S., McInnes, B. I. A., Prent, A., Gillespie, J., McDonald, B., and Darragh, M.: Resolving multiple geological events using in situ Rb–Sr geochronology: implications for metallogenesis at Tropicana, Western Australia, Geochronology, 2, 283–303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Olierook, H. K. H., Ribeiro, B. V., Liebmann, J., Rankenburg, K., Jourdan, F., Redaa, A., Lloyd, J. C., Belgrano, T. M., Corella Santa Cruz, C. R., Jegal, Y., Mercadier, J., Yu, J., Zametzer, A., Kirkland, C. L., Rohrer, R., Storey, C., Doucet, L. S., Jones, I., Stokes, L., Zack, T., Rösel, D., Hébert, N., Fougerouse, D., Kaempf, J., Datta, P., Hameed, H., Evans, N. J., Roberts, M., Mayers, C., Frew, A., Al Odeh, S., Roche, C. E., Chiaradia, M., Cruz-Uribe, A. M., Collins, A. S., Gilbert, S. E., Farkaš, J., Glorie, S., Karlsson, A., and Kumara, A. S.: Appraisal of eight natural mica reference materials for in situ Rb-Sr geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.70061</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pandey, B., Krishna, V., Sastry, D., Chabria, T., Mary, K., and Dhanaraju, R.: Pan-African whole rock Rb–Sr isochron ages for the granites and pegmatites of Kullampatti–Suriyamalai area, Salem District, Tamil Nadu, India, VI National Sym. Mass Spectrometry, Ind. Inst. of Petroleum, Dehradun, Abstract, 480–482, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pedrosa-Soares, A. C., De Campos, C. P., Noce, C., Silva, L. C., Novo, T., Roncato, J., Medeiros, S., Castañeda, C., Queiroga, G., Dantas, E., Dussin, I., and Alkmim, F.: Late Neoproterozoic-Cambrian granitic magmatism in the Araçuaí orogen (Brazil), the Eastern Brazilian Pegmatite Province and related mineral resources, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 350, 25–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/sp350.3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/sp350.3</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Redaa, A., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S., Collins, A. S., Wade, B., Löhr, S., Zack, T., and Garbe-Schönberg, D.: Assessment of elemental fractionation and matrix effects during in situ Rb–Sr dating of phlogopite by LA-ICP-MS/MS: implications for the accuracy and precision of mineral ages, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 36, 322–344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00299b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00299b</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Redaa, A., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S., Collins, A. S., Löhr, S., Vasegh, D., Forster, M., Blades, M., Zack, T., Giuliani, A., Maas, R., Baldermann, A., Dietzel, M., and Garbe‐Schönberg, D.: Testing Nano‐Powder and Fused‐Glass Mineral Reference Materials for In Situ Rb‐Sr Dating of Glauconite, Phlogopite, Biotite and Feldspar via LA‐ICP‐MS/MS, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 47, 23–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12467" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12467</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Renne, P. R., Balco, G., Ludwig, K. R., Mundil, R., and Min, K.: Response to the comment by W. H. Schwarz et al. on “Joint determination of 40K decay constants and 40Ar*∕40K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40Ar&thinsp;∕&thinsp;39Ar geochronology” by P.R. Renne et al. (2010), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 5097–5100, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rieder, M., Cavazzini, G., D'yakonov, Y. S., Frank-Kamenetskii, V. A., Gottardi, G., Guggenheim, S., Koval, P. W., Müller, G. Neiva, A. M. R., Radoslovich, E. W., Robert, J.-L., Sassi, F. P., Takeda, H., Weiss, Z. and Wones, D. R.: Nomenclature of the Micas, Clay. Clay Miner., 46, 586–595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1998.0460513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1998.0460513</a>, 1998

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romer, R. L. and Smeds, S.-A.: U-Pb columbite ages of pegmatites from Sveconorwegian terranes in southwestern Sweden, Precambrian Res., 76, 15–30, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rösel, D. and Zack, T.: LA‐ICP‐MS/MS Single‐Spot Rb‐Sr Dating, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12414</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Russell, W. A., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Tombrella, T. A.: Ca isotope fractionation on the Earth and other solar system materials, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 42, 1075–1090, 1978.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simpson, A., Gilbert, S., Tamblyn, R., Hand, M., Spandler, C., Gillespie, J., Nixon, A., and Glorie, S.: In-situ Lu Hf geochronology of garnet, apatite and xenotime by LA ICP MS/MS, Chem. Geol., 577, 120299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120299</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simpson, A., Glorie, S., Hand, M., Spandler, C., and Gilbert, S.: Garnet Lu-Hf speed dating: A novel method to rapidly resolve polymetamorphic histories, Gondwana Res., 121, 215–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.011</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Skiöld, T.: The interpretation of the Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages of late Precambrian rocks in south-western Sweden, Geol. Fören. Stock. För., 98, 3–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897609454335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897609454335</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Subarkah, D., Nixon, A. L., Jimenez, M., Collins, A. S., Blades, M. L., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S. E., Holford, S., and Jarrett, A.: Constraining the geothermal parameters of in situ Rb–Sr dating on Proterozoic shales and their subsequent applications, Geochronology, 4, 577–600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tamblyn, R., Hand, M., Simpson, A., Gilbert, S., Wade, B., and Glorie, S.: In situ laser ablation Lu–Hf geochronology of garnet across the Western Gneiss Region: campaign-style dating of metamorphism, J. Geol. Soc., 179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-094</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tamblyn, R., Gilbert, S., Glorie, S., Spandler, C., Simpson, A., Hand, M., Hasterok, D., Ware, B., and Tessalina, S.: Molybdenite Reference Materials for In Situ LA‐ICP‐MS/MS Re‐Os Geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 48, 393–410, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tillberg, M., Drake, H., Zack, T., Kooijman, E., Whitehouse, M. J., and Astrom, M. E.: In situ Rb-Sr dating of slickenfibres in deep crystalline basement faults, Sci. Rep., 10, 562, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57262-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57262-5</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tillberg, M., Drake, H., Zack, T., Hogmalm, J., Kooijman, E., and Åström, M.: Reconstructing craton‐scale tectonic events via in situ Rb-Sr geochronology of poly-phased vein mineralization, Terra Nova, 33, 502–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12542</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tischendorf, G., Förster, H.-J., Gottesmann, B., and Rieder, M.: True and brittle micas: composition and solid-solution series, Mineral. Mag., 71, 285–320, 2007.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.: IsoplotR: a free and open toolbox for geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Villa, I. M., De Bièvre, P., Holden, N. E., and Renne, P. R.: IUPAC-IUGS recommendation on the half-life of 87Rb, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 382–385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.025</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, C., Alard, O., Lai, Y.-J., Foley, S. F., Liu, Y., Munnikhuis, J., and Wang, Y.: Advances in in-situ Rb-Sr dating using LA-ICP-MS/MS: applications to igneous rocks of all ages and to the identification of unrecognized metamorphic events, Chem. Geol., 610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121073</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zack, T. and Gilbert, S. E.: In situ beta decay dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: Fundamentals and methodology, in: Methods and Applications of Geochronology, Elsevier, 211–241, ISBN 978-0-443-18803-9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00014-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18803-9.00014-6</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zack, T. and Hogmalm, K. J.: Laser ablation Rb/Sr dating by online chemical separation of Rb and Sr in an oxygen-filled reaction cell, Chem. Geol., 437, 120–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.027</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, J., Chen, H., Xiao, B., Zhu, Y., and Wang, H.: Substitution mechanism controls on compositional variations and spectral responses of white micas in major hydrothermal systems, Appl. Clay Sci., 269, 107762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2025.107762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2025.107762</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
