Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-25
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-25
27 Sep 2024
 | 27 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal GChron.

A statistical analysis of zircon age distributions in volcanic, porphyry and plutonic rocks

Chetan Nathwani, Dawid Szymanowski, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Sava Markovic, Adrianna L. Virmond, and Cyril Chelle-Michou

Abstract. The distribution of zircon crystallisation ages in igneous rocks has been proposed to provide insights into the dynamics of underlying magma reservoirs. However, the ability to interpret magmatic processes from an age distribution is challenged by a complex interplay of factors such as sampling biases, analytical uncertainties and incorporation of extraneous zircon grains. Here, we used a compilation of magmatic zircon U-Pb ages measured by chemical abrasion isotope dilution thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) to quantify the differences that exist among zircon U-Pb age distributions from different magmatic systems. The compiled dataset was rigorously filtered through a number of processing steps to isolate age distributions least impacted by sampling biases and analytical factors. We also filter the database using a new algorithm to systematically identify and remove old outliers from age distributions. We adopt the Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric to quantify the difference between the shapes of age distributions. Principal component analysis of a dissimilarity matrix of pairwise Wasserstein distances of age distributions reveals a difference between zircon age distributions found in plutonic, porphyry and volcanic rocks. Volcanic and porphyry zircon populations exhibit a skew towards younger ages in their distributions, whereas plutonic age distributions skew towards older ages. Using a bootstrap sampling approach to generate synthetic age distributions, we show that this difference can be predominantly ascribed to truncation of zircon crystallisation during volcanic eruptions and porphyry dyke emplacement, which leads to a younger skew. We also find that higher magmatic flux can contribute to the younger skew of volcanic and porphyry zircon age distributions, though we emphasise that no difference in flux is required given the strong effect of truncation on zircon age distributions. Given the multitude of factors that influence zircon age distributions, we urge caution when quantifying the thermal evolution of crustal magma bodies using zircon age distributions integrated with numerical models. 

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Chetan Nathwani, Dawid Szymanowski, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Sava Markovic, Adrianna L. Virmond, and Cyril Chelle-Michou

Status: open (until 08 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Chetan Nathwani, Dawid Szymanowski, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Sava Markovic, Adrianna L. Virmond, and Cyril Chelle-Michou
Chetan Nathwani, Dawid Szymanowski, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Sava Markovic, Adrianna L. Virmond, and Cyril Chelle-Michou

Viewed

Total article views: 154 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
125 27 2 154 5 0 0
  • HTML: 125
  • PDF: 27
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 154
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 154 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 154 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
We performed a statistical analysis of high precision U-Pb zircon age distributions. This reveals that volcanic and porphyry zircon age distributions are skewed to younger ages, whereas plutonic age distributions are skewed to older ages. We show that this is caused  by truncation of zircon crystallisation by magma evacuation, rather than differences in magmatic flux. Our contribution has key implications for modelling of magma dynamics and eruption ages using zircon age distributions.