Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-197-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-197-2023
Research article
 | 
02 May 2023
Research article |  | 02 May 2023

A practical method for assigning uncertainty and improving the accuracy of alpha-ejection corrections and eU concentrations in apatite (U–Th) ∕ He chronology

Spencer D. Zeigler, James R. Metcalf, and Rebecca M. Flowers

Viewed

Total article views: 957 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
647 268 42 957 20 21
  • HTML: 647
  • PDF: 268
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 957
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Oct 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Oct 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 957 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 941 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
(U–Th) / He dating relies on proper characterization of apatite crystal dimensions so that eU concentrations and dates can be calculated accurately and precisely, but there is systematic error and uncertainty in geometric measurements. By comparing 2D microscopy to true 3D measurements, we present a simple solution to correcting the error and quantifying the geometric uncertainty in eU and dates. Including this geometric correction and uncertainty matters for data evaluation and interpretation.