Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-125-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-125-2024
Research article
 | 
17 Apr 2024
Research article |  | 17 Apr 2024

Evaluating manual versus automated benthic foraminiferal δ18O alignment techniques for developing chronostratigraphies in marine sediment records

Jennifer L. Middleton, Julia Gottschalk, Gisela Winckler, Jean Hanley, Carol Knudson, Jesse R. Farmer, Frank Lamy, Lorraine E. Lisiecki, and Expedition 383 Scientists

Viewed

Total article views: 1,387 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,104 221 62 1,387 78 48 54
  • HTML: 1,104
  • PDF: 221
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 1,387
  • Supplement: 78
  • BibTeX: 48
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,387 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,365 with geography defined and 22 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We present oxygen isotope data for a new sediment core from the South Pacific and assign ages to our record by aligning distinct patterns in observed oxygen isotope changes to independently dated target records with the same patterns. We examine the age uncertainties associated with this approach caused by human vs. automated alignment and the sensitivity of outcomes to the choice of alignment target. These efforts help us understand the timing of past climate changes.