Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-8-85-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-8-85-2026
Research article
 | 
05 Feb 2026
Research article |  | 05 Feb 2026

Global and regional Pleistocene benthic δ18O stacks with a comparison of different age modeling strategies

Yuxin Zhou, Lorraine E. Lisiecki, Stephen R. Meyers, Taehee Lee, and Charles Lawrence

Related authors

Evaluating manual versus automated benthic foraminiferal δ18O alignment techniques for developing chronostratigraphies in marine sediment records
Jennifer L. Middleton, Julia Gottschalk, Gisela Winckler, Jean Hanley, Carol Knudson, Jesse R. Farmer, Frank Lamy, Lorraine E. Lisiecki, and Expedition 383 Scientists
Geochronology, 6, 125–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-125-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-125-2024, 2024
Short summary
An 800 kyr planktonic δ18O stack for the Western Pacific Warm Pool
Christen L. Bowman, Devin S. Rand, Lorraine E. Lisiecki, and Samantha C. Bova
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 701–713, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-701-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-701-2024, 2024
Short summary
Bayesian age models and stacks: combining age inferences from radiocarbon and benthic δ18O stratigraphic alignment
Taehee Lee, Devin Rand, Lorraine E. Lisiecki, Geoffrey Gebbie, and Charles Lawrence
Clim. Past, 19, 1993–2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1993-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1993-2023, 2023
Short summary
World Atlas of late Quaternary Foraminiferal Oxygen and Carbon Isotope Ratios
Stefan Mulitza, Torsten Bickert, Helen C. Bostock, Cristiano M. Chiessi, Barbara Donner, Aline Govin, Naomi Harada, Enqing Huang, Heather Johnstone, Henning Kuhnert, Michael Langner, Frank Lamy, Lester Lembke-Jene, Lorraine Lisiecki, Jean Lynch-Stieglitz, Lars Max, Mahyar Mohtadi, Gesine Mollenhauer, Juan Muglia, Dirk Nürnberg, André Paul, Carsten Rühlemann, Janne Repschläger, Rajeev Saraswat, Andreas Schmittner, Elisabeth L. Sikes, Robert F. Spielhagen, and Ralf Tiedemann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2553–2611, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2553-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2553-2022, 2022
Short summary
Lower oceanic δ13C during the last interglacial period compared to the Holocene
Shannon A. Bengtson, Laurie C. Menviel, Katrin J. Meissner, Lise Missiaen, Carlye D. Peterson, Lorraine E. Lisiecki, and Fortunat Joos
Clim. Past, 17, 507–528, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-507-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-507-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Abe-Ouchi, A., Saito, F., Kawamura, K., Raymo, M. E., Okuno, J., Takahashi, K., and Blatter, H.: Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis of ice-sheet volume, Nature, 500, 190–193, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12374, 2013. 
Ahn, S., Khider, D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Lawrence, C. E.: A probabilistic Pliocene–Pleistocene stack of benthic δ18O using a profile hidden Markov model, Dynamics and Statistics of the Climate System, 2, https://doi.org/10.1093/climsys/dzx002, 2017. 
Anderson, R. F., Barker, S., Fleisher, M., Gersonde, R., Steven, L., Kuhn, G., Mortyn, P. G., Pahnke, K., Julian, P., Anderson, R. F., Barker, S., Fleisher, M., Gersonde, R., Goldstein, S. L., Kuhn, G., Mortyn, P. G., Pahnke, K., and Sachs, J. P.: Biological response to millennial variability of dust and nutrient supply in the Subantarctic South Atlantic Ocean Biological response to millennial variability of dust and nutrient supply in the Subantarctic South Atlantic Ocean, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0054, 2014. 
Barker, S., Lisiecki, L. E., Knorr, G., Nuber, S., and Tzedakis, P. C.: Distinct roles for precession, obliquity, and eccentricity in Pleistocene 100 kyr glacial cycles, Science, 387, eadp3491, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491, 2025. 
Barnett, R. L., Austermann, J., Dyer, B., Telfer, M. W., Barlow, N. L. M., Boulton, S. J., Carr, A. S., and Creel, R. C.: Constraining the contribution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet to Last Interglacial sea level, Science Advances, 9, eadf0198, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adf0198, 2023. 
Download
Short summary
Marine sediments contain valuable information about past climate changes. However, dating Pleistocene marine sediments can be difficult, and the accuracy of the age model depends on the quality of the stratigraphic alignment target. We introduce three targets – Atlantic, Pacific, and global – with three distinct chronologies for the global target that incorporate astronomical forcing constraints to various degrees. This suite of targets offers flexibility in age model construction.
Share