Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
Research article
 | 
05 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 05 Dec 2019

Exploring the advantages and limitations of in situ U–Pb carbonate geochronology using speleothems

Jon Woodhead and Joseph Petrus

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (01 Nov 2019) by Perach Nuriel
AR by Jon Woodhead on behalf of the Authors (05 Nov 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (09 Nov 2019) by Perach Nuriel
ED: Publish as is (11 Nov 2019) by Klaus Mezger (Editor)
AR by Jon Woodhead on behalf of the Authors (21 Nov 2019)
Download
Short summary
Recently developed methods for in situ U–Pb age determination in carbonates have found widespread application, but the benefits and limitations of the method over bulk analysis approaches have yet to be fully explored. Here we use speleothems – cave carbonates such as stalagmites and flowstones – to investigate the utility of these in situ dating methodologies for challenging matrices with low U and Pb contents and predominantly late Cenozoic ages.