Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
Research article
 | 
05 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 05 Dec 2019

Exploring the advantages and limitations of in situ U–Pb carbonate geochronology using speleothems

Jon Woodhead and Joseph Petrus

Related authors

Double dating in the Middle Pleistocene: assessing the consistency and performance of the carbonate U–Th and U–Pb dating methods
Timothy J. Pollard, Jon D. Woodhead, Russell N. Drysdale, R. Lawrence Edwards, Xianglei Li, Ashlea N. Wainwright, Mathieu Pythoud, Hai Cheng, John C. Hellstrom, Ilaria Isola, Eleonora Regattieri, Giovanni Zanchetta, and Dylan S. Parmenter
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3594,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3594, 2024
Short summary
A regolith lead isoscape of Australia
Candan U. Desem, Patrice de Caritat, Jon Woodhead, Roland Maas, and Graham Carr
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1383–1393, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1383-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1383-2024, 2024
Short summary
DQPB: software for calculating disequilibrium U–Pb ages
Timothy Pollard, Jon Woodhead, John Hellstrom, John Engel, Roger Powell, and Russell Drysdale
Geochronology, 5, 181–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Robust isochron calculation
Roger Powell, Eleanor C. R. Green, Estephany Marillo Sialer, and Jon Woodhead
Geochronology, 2, 325–342, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-325-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-325-2020, 2020
Short summary
The 4.2 ka event in the central Mediterranean: new data from a Corchia speleothem (Apuan Alps, central Italy)
Ilaria Isola, Giovanni Zanchetta, Russell N. Drysdale, Eleonora Regattieri, Monica Bini, Petra Bajo, John C. Hellstrom, Ilaria Baneschi, Piero Lionello, Jon Woodhead, and Alan Greig
Clim. Past, 15, 135–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-135-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-135-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
In situ rubidium–strontium geochronology of white mica in young metamafic and metasomatic rocks from Syros: testing the limits of laser-ablation triple-quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer mica dating using different anchoring approaches
Jesús Muñoz-Montecinos, Andrea Giuliani, Senan Oesch, Silvia Volante, Bradley Peters, and Whitney Behr
Geochronology, 6, 585–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-585-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-585-2024, 2024
Short summary
An optimization tool for identifying multiple-diffusion domain model parameters
Andrew L. Gorin, Joshua M. Gorin, Marie Bergelin, and David L. Shuster
Geochronology, 6, 521–540, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-521-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: RA138 calcite U–Pb LA-ICP-MS primary reference material
Marcel Guillong, Elias Samankassou, Inigo A. Müller, Dawid Szymanowski, Nathan Looser, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Óscar Merino-Tomé, Juan R. Bahamonde, Yannick Buret, and Maria Ovtcharova
Geochronology, 6, 465–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-465-2024, 2024
Short summary
Revising chronological uncertainties in marine archives using global anthropogenic signals: a case study on the oceanic 13C Suess effect
Nil Irvalı, Ulysses S. Ninnemann, Are Olsen, Neil L. Rose, David J. R. Thornalley, Tor L. Mjell, and François Counillon
Geochronology, 6, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-449-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-449-2024, 2024
Short summary
The daughter–parent plot: a tool for analyzing thermochronological data
Birk Härtel and Eva Enkelmann
Geochronology, 6, 429–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-429-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Chew, D. M., Petrus, J. A., and Kamber, B. S.: U–Pb LA–ICPMS dating using accessory mineral standards with variable common Pb, Chem. Geol., 363, 185–199, 2014. 
Coogan, L. A., Parrish, R. R., and Roberts, N. M. W.: Early hydrothermal carbon uptake by the upper oceanic crust: insight from in situ U-Pb dating, Geology, 44, 147–150, 2016. 
Drost, K., Chew, D., Petrus, J. A., Scholze, F., Woodhead, J. D., Schneider, J. W., and Harper, D. A. T.: An Image Mapping Approach to U-Pb LA-ICP-MS Carbonate Dating and Applications to Direct Dating of Carbonate Sedimentation. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 19, 4631–4648, 2018. 
Goodfellow, B. W., Viola, G., Bingen, B., Nuriel, P., and Kylander-Clark, A. R. C.: Palaeocene faulting in SE Sweden from U-Pb dating of slickenfibre calcite, Terra Nova, 29, 321–328, 2017. 
Hansman, R. J., Albert, R., Gerdes, A., and Ring, U.: Absolute ages of multiple generations of brittle structures by U-Pb dating of calcite, Geology, 46, 207–210, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Recently developed methods for in situ U–Pb age determination in carbonates have found widespread application, but the benefits and limitations of the method over bulk analysis approaches have yet to be fully explored. Here we use speleothems – cave carbonates such as stalagmites and flowstones – to investigate the utility of these in situ dating methodologies for challenging matrices with low U and Pb contents and predominantly late Cenozoic ages.