Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-1-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-1-2023
Research article
 | 
11 Jan 2023
Research article |  | 11 Jan 2023

Examination of the accuracy of SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology based on samples dated by both SHRIMP and CA-TIMS

Charles W. Magee Jr., Simon Bodorkos, Christopher J. Lewis, James L. Crowley, Corey J. Wall, and Richard M. Friedman

Viewed

Total article views: 2,374 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,682 616 76 2,374 174 60 62
  • HTML: 1,682
  • PDF: 616
  • XML: 76
  • Total: 2,374
  • Supplement: 174
  • BibTeX: 60
  • EndNote: 62
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,374 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,268 with geography defined and 106 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 03 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
SHRIMP (Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe) is an instrument that for decades has used the radioactive decay of uranium into lead to measure geologic time. The accuracy and precision of this instrument has not been seriously reviewed in almost 20 years. This paper compares several dozen SHRIMP ages in our database with more accurate and precise methods to assess SHRIMP accuracy and precision. Analytical and geological complications are addressed to try to improve the method.