Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-1-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-1-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Jan 2023
Research article |
| 11 Jan 2023
| 11 Jan 2023
Examination of the accuracy of SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology based on samples dated by both SHRIMP and CA-TIMS
Charles W. Magee Jr.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Geoscience Australia, Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Drive,
Symonston ACT 2609, Australia
Simon Bodorkos
Geoscience Australia, Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Drive,
Symonston ACT 2609, Australia
Christopher J. Lewis
Geoscience Australia, Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Drive,
Symonston ACT 2609, Australia
James L. Crowley
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83725,
USA
Corey J. Wall
Pacific Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of
Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Richard M. Friedman
Pacific Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of
Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Related authors
Cate Kooymans, Charles W. Magee Jr., Kathryn Waltenberg, Noreen J. Evans, Simon Bodorkos, Yuri Amelin, Sandra L. Kamo, and Trevor Ireland
Geochronology, 6, 337–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-337-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Zircon is a mineral where uranium decays to lead. Some radiation damage lets lead escape. A method called chemical abrasion (CA) dissolves out the damaged portions of zircon so that remaining zircon retains lead. We compare ion beam analyses of untreated and chemically abraded zircons. The ion beam ages for untreated zircons match the reference values for untreated zircon. The ion beam ages for CA zircon match CA reference ages. Other elements are unaffected by the chemical abrasion process.
Cate Kooymans, Charles W. Magee Jr., Kathryn Waltenberg, Noreen J. Evans, Simon Bodorkos, Yuri Amelin, Sandra L. Kamo, and Trevor Ireland
Geochronology, 6, 337–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-337-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Zircon is a mineral where uranium decays to lead. Some radiation damage lets lead escape. A method called chemical abrasion (CA) dissolves out the damaged portions of zircon so that remaining zircon retains lead. We compare ion beam analyses of untreated and chemically abraded zircons. The ion beam ages for untreated zircons match the reference values for untreated zircon. The ion beam ages for CA zircon match CA reference ages. Other elements are unaffected by the chemical abrasion process.
Related subject area
SIMS, LA-ICP-MS
Effect of chemical abrasion of zircon on SIMS U–Pb, δ18O, trace element, and LA-ICPMS trace element and Lu–Hf isotopic analyses
On the viability of detrital biotite Rb–Sr geochronology
Late Neogene terrestrial climate reconstruction of the central Namib Desert derived by the combination of U–Pb silcrete and terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating
In situ U–Pb dating of 4 billion-year-old carbonates in the martian meteorite Allan Hills 84001
Constraining the geothermal parameters of in situ Rb–Sr dating on Proterozoic shales and their subsequent applications
Short communication: On the potential use of materials with heterogeneously distributed parent and daughter isotopes as primary standards for non-U–Pb geochronological applications of laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
In situ Lu–Hf geochronology of calcite
Calcite U–Pb dating of altered ancient oceanic crust in the North Pamir, Central Asia
Towards in situ U–Pb dating of dolomite
Uranium incorporation in fluorite and exploration of U–Pb dating
U − Pb geochronology of epidote by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) as a tool for dating hydrothermal-vein formation
Tools for uranium characterization in carbonate samples: case studies of natural U–Pb geochronology reference materials
Direct U–Pb dating of carbonates from micron-scale femtosecond laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry images using robust regression
Technical note: LA–ICP-MS U–Pb dating of unetched and etched apatites
The use of ASH-15 flowstone as a matrix-matched reference material for laser-ablation U − Pb geochronology of calcite
Expanding the limits of laser-ablation U–Pb calcite geochronology
Resolving multiple geological events using in situ Rb–Sr geochronology: implications for metallogenesis at Tropicana, Western Australia
LA-ICPMS U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircon grains from the Coconino, Moenkopi, and Chinle formations in the Petrified Forest National Park (Arizona)
Evaluating the reliability of U–Pb laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) carbonate geochronology: matrix issues and a potential calcite validation reference material
Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations
Cate Kooymans, Charles W. Magee Jr., Kathryn Waltenberg, Noreen J. Evans, Simon Bodorkos, Yuri Amelin, Sandra L. Kamo, and Trevor Ireland
Geochronology, 6, 337–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-337-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Zircon is a mineral where uranium decays to lead. Some radiation damage lets lead escape. A method called chemical abrasion (CA) dissolves out the damaged portions of zircon so that remaining zircon retains lead. We compare ion beam analyses of untreated and chemically abraded zircons. The ion beam ages for untreated zircons match the reference values for untreated zircon. The ion beam ages for CA zircon match CA reference ages. Other elements are unaffected by the chemical abrasion process.
Kyle P. Larson, Brendan Dyck, Sudip Shrestha, Mark Button, and Yani Najman
Geochronology, 6, 303–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-303-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates the utility of laser-ablation-based detrital biotite Rb–Sr geochronology to investigate the rates of exhumation and burial in active mountain-building systems. It is further demonstrated that additional chemical data collected during spot analyses can be used to determine temperatures recorded in biotite. The method used has advantages over traditional methods in speed, ease of acquisition, and the ability to collect additional chemical information.
Benedikt Ritter, Richard Albert, Aleksandr Rakipov, Frederik M. Van der Wateren, Tibor J. Dunai, and Axel Gerdes
Geochronology, 5, 433–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-433-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-433-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Chronological information on the evolution of the Namib Desert is scarce. We used U–Pb dating of silcretes formed by pressure solution during calcrete formation to track paleoclimate variability since the Late Miocene. Calcrete formation took place during the Pliocene with an abrupt cessation at 2.9 Ma. The end took place due to deep canyon incision which we dated using TCN exposure dating. With our data we correct and contribute to the Neogene history of the Namib Desert and its evolution.
Romain Tartèse and Ian C. Lyon
Geochronology, 4, 683–690, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-683-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-683-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Absolute chronological constraints are crucial in Earth and planetary sciences. In recent years, U–Pb dating of carbonates has provided information on the timing of, for example, diagenesis, faulting, or hydrothermalism. These studies have targeted relatively young terrestrial carbonates up to 300 million years old. By dating 3.9 billion-year-old martian carbonates in situ using the U–Pb chronometer, we show that this system is robust in ancient samples that have had a relatively simple history.
Darwinaji Subarkah, Angus L. Nixon, Monica Jimenez, Alan S. Collins, Morgan L. Blades, Juraj Farkaš, Sarah E. Gilbert, Simon Holford, and Amber Jarrett
Geochronology, 4, 577–600, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Advancements in technology have introduced new techniques to more quickly and cheaply date rocks with little sample preparation. A unique use of this method is to date shales and constrain when these rocks were first deposited. This approach can also time when such sequences were subsequently affected by heat or fluids after they were deposited. This is useful, as the formation of precious-metal-bearing systems or petroleum source rocks is commonly associated with such processes.
Daniil V. Popov
Geochronology, 4, 399–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-399-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-399-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work provides equations allowing the use of minerals with variable concentrations of parent and daughter isotopes as primary standards to correct for elemental fractionation during the analysis by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.
Alexander Simpson, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Carl Spandler, Sarah Gilbert, and Brad Cave
Geochronology, 4, 353–372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The article demonstrates a new technique that can be used to determine the age of calcite crystallisation using the decay of 176Lu to 176Hf. The technique is novel because (a) Lu–Hf radiometric dating is rarely applied to calcite and (b) this is the first instance where analysis has been conducted by ablating the sample with a laser beam rather than bulk dissolution. By using laser ablation the original context of the sample is preserved.
Johannes Rembe, Renjie Zhou, Edward R. Sobel, Jonas Kley, Jie Chen, Jian-Xin Zhao, Yuexing Feng, and Daryl L. Howard
Geochronology, 4, 227–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-227-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-227-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Calcite is frequently formed during alteration processes in the basaltic, uppermost layer of juvenile oceanic crust. Weathered oceanic basalts are hard to date with conventional radiometric methods. We show in a case study from the North Pamir, Central Asia, that calcite U–Pb age data, supported by geochemistry and petrological microscopy, have potential to date sufficiently old oceanic basalts, if the time span between basalt extrusion and latest calcite precipitation (~ 25 Myr) is considered.
Bar Elisha, Perach Nuriel, Andrew Kylander-Clark, and Ram Weinberger
Geochronology, 3, 337–349, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-337-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-337-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Distinguishing between different dolomitization processes is challenging yet critical for resolving some of the issues and ambiguities related to the formation of dolomitic rocks. Accurate U–Pb absolute dating of dolomite by LA-ICP-MS could contribute to a better understanding of the dolomitization process by placing syngenetic, early diagenetic, and/or epigenetic events in the proper geological context.
Louise Lenoir, Thomas Blaise, Andréa Somogyi, Benjamin Brigaud, Jocelyn Barbarand, Claire Boukari, Julius Nouet, Aurore Brézard-Oudot, and Maurice Pagel
Geochronology, 3, 199–227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-199-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-199-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To explore the U–Pb geochronometer in fluorite, the spatial distribution of uranium and other substituted elements in natural crystals is investigated using induced fission-track and synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence mapping. LA-ICP-MS U–Pb dating on four crystals, which preserve micrometer-scale variations in U concentrations, yields identical ages within analytical uncertainty. Our results show that fluorite U–Pb geochronology has potential for dating distinct crystal growth stages.
Veronica Peverelli, Tanya Ewing, Daniela Rubatto, Martin Wille, Alfons Berger, Igor Maria Villa, Pierre Lanari, Thomas Pettke, and Marco Herwegh
Geochronology, 3, 123–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-123-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-123-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents LA-ICP-MS U–Pb geochronology of epidote in hydrothermal veins. The challenges of epidote dating are addressed, and a protocol is proposed allowing us to obtain epidote U–Pb ages with a precision as good as 5 % in addition to the initial Pb isotopic composition of the epidote-forming fluid. Epidote demonstrates its potential to be used as a U–Pb geochronometer and as a fluid tracer, allowing us to reconstruct the timing of hydrothermal activity and the origin of the fluid(s).
E. Troy Rasbury, Theodore M. Present, Paul Northrup, Ryan V. Tappero, Antonio Lanzirotti, Jennifer M. Cole, Kathleen M. Wooton, and Kevin Hatton
Geochronology, 3, 103–122, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-103-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-103-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We characterize three natural carbonate samples with elevated uranium/lead (U/Pb) ratios to demonstrate techniques improving the understanding of U incorporation in carbonates for U/Pb dating. With the rapidly accelerating application of laser ablation analyses, there is a great need for well-characterized reference materials that can serve multiple functions. Strontium (Sr) isotope analyses and U XANES demonstrate that these samples could be used as reference materials.
Guilhem Hoareau, Fanny Claverie, Christophe Pecheyran, Christian Paroissin, Pierre-Alexandre Grignard, Geoffrey Motte, Olivier Chailan, and Jean-Pierre Girard
Geochronology, 3, 67–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-67-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-67-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A new methodology for the micron-scale uranium–lead dating of carbonate minerals is proposed. It is based on the extraction of ages directly from pixel images (< 1 mm2) obtained by laser ablation coupled to a mass spectrometer. The ages are calculated with a robust linear regression through the pixel values. This methodology is compared to existing approaches.
Fanis Abdullin, Luigi A. Solari, Jesús Solé, and Carlos Ortega-Obregón
Geochronology, 3, 59–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-59-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-59-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Unetched and etched apatite grains from five samples were dated by U–Pb method using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Our experiment indicates that etching needed for apatite fission track dating has insignificant effects on obtaining accurate U–Pb ages; thus, the laser ablation-based technique may be used for apatite fission track and U–Pb double dating.
Perach Nuriel, Jörn-Frederik Wotzlaw, Maria Ovtcharova, Anton Vaks, Ciprian Stremtan, Martin Šala, Nick M. W. Roberts, and Andrew R. C. Kylander-Clark
Geochronology, 3, 35–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-35-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-35-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This contribution presents a new reference material, ASH-15 flowstone with an age of 2.965 ± 0.011 Ma (95 % CI), to be used for in situ U–Pb dating of carbonate material. The new age analyses include the use of the EARTHTIME isotopic tracers and a large number of sub-samples (n = 37) with small aliquots (1–7 mg) each that are more representative of laser-ablation spot analysis. The new results could improve the propagated uncertainties on the final age with a minimal value of 0.4 %.
Andrew R. C. Kylander-Clark
Geochronology, 2, 343–354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-343-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-343-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper serves as a guide to those interested in dating calcite by laser ablation. Within it are theoretical and practical limits of U and Pb concentrations (and U / Pb ratios), which would allow viable extraction of ages from calcite (and other minerals with moderate U / Pb ratios), and which type of instrumentation would be appropriate for any given sample. The method described uses a new detector array, allowing for lower detection limits and thereby expanding the range of viable samples.
Hugo K. H. Olierook, Kai Rankenburg, Stanislav Ulrich, Christopher L. Kirkland, Noreen J. Evans, Stephen Brown, Brent I. A. McInnes, Alexander Prent, Jack Gillespie, Bradley McDonald, and Miles Darragh
Geochronology, 2, 283–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Using a relatively new dating technique, in situ Rb–Sr geochronology, we constrain the ages of two generations of mineral assemblages from the Tropicana Zone, Western Australia. The first, dated at ca. 2535 Ma, is associated with exhumation of an Archean craton margin and gold mineralization. The second, dated at ca. 1210 Ma, has not been previously documented in the Tropicana Zone. It is probably associated with Stage II of the Albany–Fraser Orogeny and additional gold mineralization.
George Gehrels, Dominique Giesler, Paul Olsen, Dennis Kent, Adam Marsh, William Parker, Cornelia Rasmussen, Roland Mundil, Randall Irmis, John Geissman, and Christopher Lepre
Geochronology, 2, 257–282, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-257-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-257-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
U–Pb ages of zircon crystals are used to determine the provenance and depositional age of strata of the Triassic Chinle and Moenkopi formations and the Permian Coconino Sandstone of northern Arizona. Primary source regions include the Ouachita orogen, local Precambrian basement rocks, and Permian–Triassic magmatic arcs to the south and west. Ages from fine-grained strata provide reliable depositional ages, whereas ages from sandstones are compromised by zircon grains recycled from older strata.
Marcel Guillong, Jörn-Frederik Wotzlaw, Nathan Looser, and Oscar Laurent
Geochronology, 2, 155–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-155-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-155-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The dating of carbonates by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry is improved by an additional, newly characterised reference material and adapted data evaluation protocols: the shape (diameter to depth) of the ablation crater has to be as similar as possible in the reference material used and the unknown samples to avoid an offset. Different carbonates have different ablation rates per laser pulse. With robust uncertainty propagation, precision can be as good as 2–3 %.
Nick M. W. Roberts, Kerstin Drost, Matthew S. A. Horstwood, Daniel J. Condon, David Chew, Henrik Drake, Antoni E. Milodowski, Noah M. McLean, Andrew J. Smye, Richard J. Walker, Richard Haslam, Keith Hodson, Jonathan Imber, Nicolas Beaudoin, and Jack K. Lee
Geochronology, 2, 33–61, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-33-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Here we review current progress in LA-ICP-MS U–Pb carbonate geochronology and present strategies for acquisition and interpretation of carbonate U–Pb dates. We cover topics from imaging techniques and U and Pb incorporation into calcite to potential limitations of the method – disequilibrium and isotope mobility. We demonstrate the incorporation of imaging and compositional data to help refine and interpret U–Pb dates. We expect this paper to become a
go-toreference paper for years to come.
Cited articles
Black, L., Kamo, S. L., Williams, I. S., Mundil, R., Davis, D. W., Korsch,
R. J., and Foudoulis, C.: The application of SHRIMP to Phanerozoic
geochronology; a critical appraisal of four zircon standards, Chem.
Geol., 200, 171–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(03)00166-9, 2003.
Black, L., Kamo, S. L., Allen, C. M., Davis, D. W., Aleinikoff, J. N.,
Valley, J. W., Mundil, R., Campbell, I. H., Korsch, R. J., Williams, I. S.,
and Foudoulis, C.: Improved
Black, L. P. and Jagodzinski, E. A.: Importance of establishing sources of
uncertainty for the derivation of reliable SHRIMP ages, Aust. J.
Earth Sci., 50, 503–512, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-0952.2003.01007.x,
2003.
Bodorkos, S., Stern, R. A., Kamo, S. L., Corfu, F., and Hickman, A. H.: OG1:
A Natural Reference Material for Quantifying SIMS Instrumental Mass
Fractionation (IMF) of Pb Isotopes During Zircon Dating, EOS T.
Am. Geophys. Un., 90, Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract V33B-2044, https://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2009/FM/V33B-2044.html (last access: 5 January 2023), 2009.
Bodorkos, S., Crowley, J., Metcalfe, I., Nicoll, R. S., and Sircombe, K.:
Best of both worlds: combining SHRIMP and CA-TIMS methods in refining
geochronological determinations for timescale calibration, in: 6th
International SHRIMP Workshop–Program and Abstracts, 21–24, Canberra,
ACT, Geoscience Australia Record, 2012/52, http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/74275 (last access: 5 January 2023), 2012.
Bodorkos, S., Blevin, P. L., Simpson, C. J., Gilmore, P. J., Glen, R. A.,
Greenfield, J. E., Hegarty, R., and Quinn, C. D.: New SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages
from the Lachlan, Thomson and Delamerian orogens, New South Wales: July
2009–June 2010, Geoscience Australia Record 2013/29, Geological Survey of
New South Wales Report GS2013/0427, Geoscience Australia, Canberra,
https://doi.org/10.11636/Record.2013.029, 2013.
Bodorkos, S., Pogson, D. J., and Friedman, R. M.: Zircon U-Pb dating of
biostratigraphically constrained felsic volcanism in the Lachlan Orogen via
SHRIMP and CA-IDTIMS: implications for the division of Early Devonian time,
in: Granites2017@Benalla Extended Abstracts, edited by: Vearncombe, J., Benalla,
VIC: Australian Institute of Geoscientists, Bulletin 65, 8–11,
https://www.aig.org.au/publication-shop/digital-aig-bulletin-no-65-granites2017benalla/ (last access: 5 January 2023),
2017.
Brownlow, J. and Cross, A.: TIMS U-Pb and SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the
Dundee Rhyodacite, northern New England, NSW, in: New England Orogen
Conference Proceedings 2010, edited by: Buckman, S. and Blevin, P., University of New
England, 387 pp., https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258100761_New_England_Orogen_2010 (last access: 5 January 2023), 2010.
Chapman, T., Milan, L. A., Metcalfe, I., Blevin, P. L., and Crowley, J.:
Pulses in silicic arc magmatism initiate end-Permian climate instability and
extinction, Nat. Geosci., 15, 411–416, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00934-1, 2022.
Chisholm, E. I., Blevin, P. L., and Simpson, C. J.: New SHRIMP U–Pb zircon
ages from the New England Orogen, New South Wales: July 2010–June 2012,
Record 2014/13, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Report GS2013/1838,
Geological Survey of New South Wales, Maitland,
https://doi.org/10.11636/Record.2014.013, 2014.
Claiborne, L. L., Miller, C. F., Flanagan, D. M., Clynne, M. A., and Wooden,
J. L.: Zircon reveals protracted magma storage and recycling beneath Mount
St. Helens, Geology, 38, 1011–1014, https://doi.org/10.1130/G31285.1, 2010.
Claoué-Long, J. C., Compston, W., Roberts, J., and Fanning, C. M.: Two
Carboniferous ages: a comparison of SHRIMP zircon dating with conventional
zircon ages and
Condon, D. J., Schoene, B., McLean, N. M., Bowring, S. A., and Parrish, R.:
Metrology and traceability of U-Pb isotope dilution geochronology (EARTHTIME
Tracer Calibration Part I), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 464–480,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.026, 2015.
Cross, A. and Blevin, P.: Summary of results for the joint GSNSW – GA
geochronology project: New England Orogen and Sydney-Gunnedah Basin
April–July 2008, Geological Survey Report No., GS2010/0778, 50 pp., https://search.geoscience.nsw.gov.au/report/R00036510 (last access: 5 January 2023), 2010.
Cross, A. J. and Blevin, P. L.: Summary of results for the joint GSNSW–GA
geochronology project: New England Orogen 2009–2010, Record 2013/27,
Geological Survey of New South Wales Report GS2013/0426, Geoscience
Australia, Canberra, https://doi.org/10.11636/Record.2013.027, 2013.
Crowley, J. L., Schoene, B., and Bowring, S. A.: U-Pb dating of zircon in the
Bishop Tuff at the millennial scale, Geology, 35, 1123–1126, https://doi.org/10.1130/G24017A.1, 2007.
Geochron Delivery: SHRIMP, Geochron Delivery [data set], http://www.ga.gov.au/geochron-sapub-web/,
last access: 5 January 2023.
Gerstenberger, H. and Haase, G.: A highly effective emitter substance for
mass spectrometric Pb isotope ratio determinations, Chem. Geol., 136,
309–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(96)00033-2, 1997.
Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., and Ogg, G. M. (Eds.): Geologic Time Scale 2020, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1127/nos/2020/0634,
2020.
Helby, R., Morgan, R., and Partridge, A.: Updated Jurassic early Cretaceous
dinocyst zonation, NWS Australia, Geoscience Australia publication, http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/61127 (last access: 5 January 2023), 2004.
Henderson, R. A., Innes, B. M., Fergusson, C. L., Crawford, A. J., and
Withnall, I. W.: Collisional accretion of a Late Ordovician oceanic island
arc, northern Tasman Orogenic Zone, Australia, Aust. J. Earth
Sci., 58, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2010.535564, 2011.
Hiess, J., Condon, D. J., McLean, N., and Noble, S. R.:
Huyskens M. H., Zink, S., and Amelin, Y.: Evaluation of temperature-time
conditions for the chemical abrasion treatment of single zircons for U-Pb
geochronology, Chem. Geol., 438, 25–35,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.013, 2016.
Jaffey, A. H., Flynn, K. F., Glendenin, L. E., Bentley, W. C., and Essling,
A. M.: Precision measurements of half-lives and specific activities of
235U and 238U, Phys. Rev. C, 4, 1889–1906, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.4.1889, 1971.
Jagodzinski, E. A. and Black, L. P.: U-Pb dating of silicic lavas, sills and
syneruptive resedimented volcaniclastic deposits of the Lower Devonian
Crudine Group, Hill End Trough, New South Wales, Aust. J. Earth
Sci., 46, 749–764, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-0952.1999.00743.x, 1999.
Jeon, H. and Whitehouse, M. J.: A critical evaluation of U-Pb Calibration
Schemes used in SIMS Zircon Geochronology, Geostand. Geoanal.
Res., 39, 443–452, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2014.00325.x, 2014.
Jones, S. L., Blevin, P. L., Waltenberg, K., Milan, L. A., and Bodorkos, S.: New SHRIMP U-Pb ages from the New England Orogen, New South Wales: New England Igneous Metallogenesis Project, July 2018–June 2019, Geoscience Australia Record, Geological Survey of New South Wales Report, in preparation, 2023.
Krogh, T. E.: A low contamination method for hydrothermal decomposition of
zircon and extraction of U and Pb for isotopic age determination, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 37, 485–494, 1973.
Kryza, R., Crowley, Q. G., Larionov, A., Pin, C., Oberc-Dzirdzic, T., and
Mochnacka, K.: Chemical Abrasion applied to SHRIMP zircon geochronology: an
example from the Variscan Karkonosze Granite (Sudetes, SW Poland), Gondwana
Res., 21, 757–767, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.007, 2012.
Kryza, R., Schaltegger, U., Oberc-Dziedzic, T., Pin, C., and Ovtcharova, M.:
Geochronology of a composite granitoid pluton: a high-precision ID-TIMS U-Pb
zircon study of the Variscan Karkonosze Granite (SW Poland), Int.
J. Earth Sci., 103, 683–696, 2014.
Laurie, J. R., Bodorkos, S., Nicoll, R. S., Crowley, J. L., Mantle, D. J.,
Mory, A. J., Wood, G. R., Backhouse, J., Holmes, E. K., Smith, T. E., and
Champion, D. C.: Calibrating the middle and late Permian palynostratigraphy
of Australia to the geologic time-scale via U–Pb zircon CA-IDTIMS dating,
Aust. J. Earth Sci., 63, 701–730,
https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2016.1233456, 2016.
Lena, L., López-Martínez, R., Lescano, M., Aguire-Urreta, B., Concheyro, A., Vennari, V., Naipauer, M., Samankassou, E., Pimentel, M., Ramos, V. A., and Schaltegger, U.: High-precision U–Pb ages in the early Tithonian to early Berriasian and implications for the numerical age of the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary, Solid Earth, 10, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1-2019, 2019.
Lewis, C. J., Taylor, D. H., Cayley, R. A., Schofield, A., and Skladzien, P. B.:
New SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages from the Stavely region, western Victoria: July
2013–June 2014, Geoscience Australia Record 2015/26,
https://doi.org/10.11636/Record.2015.026, 2015.
Lewis, C. J., Taylor, D. H., Cayley, R. A., Schofield, A., and Duncan, R.: New
SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages from the Stavely region, western Victoria: July
2014–June 2016, Geoscience Australia Record 2016/27, 203 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.11636/Record.2016.027, 2016.
Lewis, C. J., Bodorkos, S., Schofield, A., Crowley, J. L., Armstrong, R. A.,
and Fu, B.: An isotopic characterisation of rocks from the Stavely Arc,
western Victoria – a zircon perspective, in: Granites2017@Benalla Extended
Abstracts, edited by: Vearncombe, J., Benalla, VIC, Australian Institute of
Geoscientists, Bulletin 65, 74–78, https://www.aig.org.au/publication-shop/digital-aig-bulletin-no-65-granites2017benalla/ (last access: 5 January 2023),
2017.
Ludwig, K. R.: Squid 1.02. Berkeley Geochronology Center, Special
Publication 2, 2001.
Ludwig, K. R.: User's Manual for Isoplot 3.00, Berkeley Geochronology
Center, Berkeley, CA, 70 pp., 2003.
Ludwig, K. R.: Squid 2, A user's manual (revision 2.50, April 2009),
Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 100 pp., 2009 (code available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/squid2/, last access: 5 January 2023).
Magee Jr., C., Ferris, J., and Magee Sr., C.: Effect of impact energy on SIMS
U-Pb zircon geochronology, Surf. Interface Anal., 46, 322–325,
https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5629, 2014.
Magee Jr., C. W., Danišík, M., and Mernagh, T.: Extreme isotopologue disequilibrium in molecular SIMS species during SHRIMP geochronology, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 523–536, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-523-2017, 2017.
Mattinson, J. M.: Zircon U-Pb chemical abrasion (“CA-TIMS”) method:
Combined annealing and multi-step partial dissolution analysis for improved
precision and accuracy of zircon ages, Chem. Geol., 220, 47–66,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.03.011, 2005.
Metcalfe, I., Crowley, J. L., Nicoll, R. S., and Schmitz, M.: High-precision
U-Pb CA-TIMS calibration of middle Permian to lower Triassic sequences, mass
extinction and extreme climate-change in eastern Australian Gondwana,
Gondwana Res., 28, 61–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.09.002, 2015.
Mundil, R., Ludwig, K. R., Metcalfe, I., and Renne, P. R.: Age and timing of the
Permian Mass Extinctions: U/Pb Dating of Closed-System Zircons, Science, 305,
1760–1763, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101012, 2004.
Packham, G. H., Percival, I. G., Rickards, R. B., and Wright, A. J.: Late
Silurian and Early Devonian biostratigraphy in the Hill End Trough and the
Limekilns area, New South Wales, Alcheringa, 25, 251–261,
https://doi.org/10.1080/03115510108619106, 2001.
Pogson, D. J. and Watkins, J. J.: Bathurst 1 : 250 000 Geological Sheet SI/55-8,
2nd Edn., Explanatory Notes, Geological Survey of New South Wales,
Sydney, https://search.geoscience.nsw.gov.au/report/R00047871 (last access: 5 January 2023),
1998.
Reiners, P., Carlson, R., Renne, P., Cooper, K., Granger, D., McLean, N., and
Schoene, B.: Interpretational approaches: making sense of data, in:
Geochronology and Thermochronology, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118455876.ch4, 2018.
Roberts, J., Claoué-Long, J. C., and Foster, C. B.: SHRIMP zircon dating
of the Permian System of eastern Australia, Aust. J. Earth
Sci., 43, 401–421, https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099608728264, 1996.
Schaltegger, U., Schmitt, A. K., and Horstwood, M. S. A.: U-Th-Pb zircon
geochronology by ID-TIMS, SIMS, and laser ablation ICP-MS: Recipes,
interpretations, and opportunities, Chem. Geol., 402, 89–110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.02.028, 2015.
Schmitt, A. K. and Vazquez, J. A.: Secondary Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Analysis in Petrochronology, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 83,
199–230, https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2017.83.7, 2017.
Schmitz, M. D. and Schoene, B.: Derivation of isotope ratios, errors and
error correlations for U-Pb geochronology using
205Pb-235U-(233U)-spiked isotope dilution thermal ionization
mass spectrometric data, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 8,
Q08006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001492, 2007.
Scoates, J. S. and Friedman, R. M.: Precise Age of the Platiniferous Merensky
Reef, Buishveld Complex, South Africa, by the U-Pb Zircon Chemical Abrasion
ID-TIMS Technique, Econ. Geol., 103, 465–471, https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.103.3.465, 2008.
Stern, R. A. and Amelin, Y.: Assessment of errors in SIMS zircon U-Pb
geochronology using a natural zircon standard and NIST SRM 610 glass,
Chem. Geol., 197, 111–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00320-0, 2003.
Stern, R. A., Bodorkos, S., Kamo, S. L., Hickman, A. H., and Corfu, F.:
Measurement of SIMS instrumental mass fractionation of Pb isotopes during
zircon dating, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 33, 145–168,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2009.00023.x, 2009.
Watts, K. E., Coble, M. A., Vazquez, J. A., Henry, C. D., Colgan, J. P., and
John, D. A: Chemical abrasion-SIMS (CA-SIMS) U-Pb dating of zircon from the
late Eocene Caetano caldera Nevada, Chem. Geol., 439, 139–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.06.013, 2016.
Webb, P., Wiedenbeck, M., and Glodny, J.: An International Proficiency Test for U-Pb Geochronology Laboratories – Report on the 2019 Round of G-Chron based on Palaeozoic Zircon Rak-17, in preparation, 2023.
Widmann, P., Davies, J. H. F. L., and Schaltegger, U.: Calibrating chemical
abrasion: Its effects on zircon crystal structure. Chemical composition and
U-Pb age, Chem. Geol., 511, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.02.026,
2019.
Wu, Q., Ramezani, J., Zhang, H., Wang, T., Yuan, D., Mu, L., Zhang, Y., Li,
X., and Shen, S.: Calibrating the Guadalupian Series (Middle Permian) of
South China, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 466,
361–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.011, 2017.
Short summary
SHRIMP (Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe) is an instrument that for decades has used the radioactive decay of uranium into lead to measure geologic time. The accuracy and precision of this instrument has not been seriously reviewed in almost 20 years. This paper compares several dozen SHRIMP ages in our database with more accurate and precise methods to assess SHRIMP accuracy and precision. Analytical and geological complications are addressed to try to improve the method.
SHRIMP (Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe) is an instrument that for decades has used the...
