Geochronology
Geochronology
GChron
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-199-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-199-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Research article
 | 
05 Jun 2025
Research article |  | 05 Jun 2025

A comparison between in situ monazite Lu–Hf and U–Pb geochronology

Alexander T. De Vries Van Leeuwen, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Jacob Mulder, and Sarah E. Gilbert

Viewed

Total article views: 1,153 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
840 267 46 1,153 57 103
  • HTML: 840
  • PDF: 267
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 1,153
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,153 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,137 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
In this contribution, we demonstrate in situ monazite lutetium–hafnium dating and compare results with uranium–lead dating. We present data from monazite reference materials and complex samples to demonstrate the viability of this method. We show that in situ lutetium–hafnium dating of monazite can resolve multiple age populations and may find use in scenarios where the uranium–lead system has been compromised.
Read more
Share