Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-335-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-335-2025
Research article
 | 
07 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 07 Aug 2025

Radiometric dating of Middle Pleistocene carbonates: assessing consistency and performance of the U–Th and U–Pb dating methods

Timothy J. Pollard, Jon D. Woodhead, Russell N. Drysdale, R. Lawrence Edwards, Xianglei Li, Ashlea N. Wainwright, Mathieu Pythoud, Hai Cheng, John C. Hellstrom, Ilaria Isola, Eleonora Regattieri, Giovanni Zanchetta, and Dylan S. Parmenter

Related authors

Annual-resolution hydroclimate variability during the MCA–LIA transition in southern Iberia: insights into the role of cut-off lows (DANAs) from a speleothem record in Ardales Cave
Celia Campa-Bousoño, Miguel Iglesias, Iñaki Vadillo, Lucía Ojeda, Jorge Pisonero, Hai Cheng, R. Lawrence Edwards, and Heather Stoll
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3717,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3717, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).
Short summary
Speleothem sulphate and trace elements constrain Alpine glacial inception across the Marine Isotope Stage 11/10 transition
Jonathan L. Baker, Alexandre Honiat, Peter M. Wynn, Jens Fohlmeister, Martin Trüssel, Samuel Hollowood, Jiaoyang Ruan, Regina Mertz-Kraus, R. Lawrence Edwards, and Christoph Spötl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2840,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2840, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).
Short summary
Interplay of North Atlantic freshening and deep convection during the last deglaciation constrained by Iberian speleothems
Laura Endres, Carlos Pérez-Mejías, Ruza Ivanovic, Lauren Gregoire, Anna L. C. Hughes, Hai Cheng, and Heather Stoll
Clim. Past, 22, 797–824, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-22-797-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-22-797-2026, 2026
Short summary
The elusive 8.2 ka event in speleothems from southern France
Maddalena Passelergue, Isabelle Couchoud, Russell N. Drysdale, John Hellstrom, Dirk L. Hoffmann, and Alan Greig
Clim. Past, 22, 315–338, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-22-315-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-22-315-2026, 2026
Short summary
Precession-driven low-latitude hydrological cycle paced by shifting perihelion
Hu Yang, Xiaoxu Shi, Xulong Wang, Qingsong Liu, Yi Zhong, Xiaodong Liu, Youbin Sun, Yanjun Cai, Fei Liu, Gerrit Lohmann, Martin Werner, Zhimin Jian, Tainã M. L. Pinho, Hai Cheng, Lijuan Lu, Jiping Liu, Chao-Yuan Yang, Qinghua Yang, Yongyun Hu, Xing Cheng, Jingyu Zhang, and Dake Chen
Clim. Past, 21, 1263–1279, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1263-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1263-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersen, M. B., Stirling, C. H., Potter, E.-K., and Halliday, A. N.: Toward epsilon levels of measurement precision on 234U/238U by using MC-ICPMS, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 237, 107–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2004.07.004, 2004. a
Andersen, M. B., Romaniello, S., Vance, D., Little, S. H., Herdman, R., and Lyons, T. W.: A modern framework for the interpretation of 238U /235U in studies of ancient ocean redox, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 400, 184–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.051, 2014. a
Andersen, M. B., Elliott, T., Freymuth, H., Sims, K. W. W., Niu, Y., and Kelley, K. A.: The terrestrial uranium isotope cycle, Nature, 517, 356–359, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14062, 2015. a
Andersen, M. B., Stirling, C. H., and Weyer, S.: Uranium isotope fractionation, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 82, 799–850, https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2017.82.19, 2017. a
Bajo, P., Drysdale, R., Woodhead, J., Hellstrom, J., and Zanchetta, G.: High-resolution U–Pb dating of an Early Pleistocene stalagmite from Corchia Cave (central italy), Quat. Geochronol., 14, 5–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2012.10.005, 2012. a, b
Download
Short summary
The uranium–thorium (U–Th) and uranium–lead (U–Pb) radiometric dating methods are both suitable for dating carbonate samples ranging in age from about 400 000 to 650 000 years. Here we test agreement between the two methods by dating speleothems (i.e. secondary cave mineral deposits) that are well-suited to both methods. We demonstrate excellent agreement between them and discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Share