Dear Lasse Sander, thank you for updating the figure. I would still suggest a different color for the sites in the picture. They are Black on great. And maybe a bit bigger print.
And I too strongly suggest using modern wood as the source of information. The bomb peak signal provides such a unique tool. And you must be aware that this tool is disappearing.
The bomb peak is gone this/next year. The signal is overridden by the fossil fuels CO2 in the atmosphere. So I hope there are archives of modern collected wood (with the year of the collection) that can still be used to expand the data. I will now accept this paper with just technical corrections as suggested by both reviews. Best, Irka

Dear Lasse,
Many thanks for your time in considering the reviewer's points fully. We are happy to accept subject to technical corrections as the Associate Editor says, and this will be a valuable contribution to Geochronology. These minor corrections include an adjustment to the site location figure- this is for ease of presentation, so readers can quickly discern the information contained within the figure, regardless of their individual screen/print resolution, etc. As the AE says, an increase in the font size, and change of colour, so the site locations really stand out, would be helpful.
Along with technical corrections, it would seem worth inserting a line or so (this can be very brief) to mention the potential future use of the bomb peak in similar work- if you are amenable to that? I appreciate your comment addressing the fact these measurements were not practical during the work presented here, but see comments from the reviewer and AE, regarding the importance of this for providing additional context and stimulating future thoughts for the field.

Best wishes,

Philippa