Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-209-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-209-2020
Research article
 | 
31 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 31 Jul 2020

Resolving the timescales of magmatic and hydrothermal processes associated with porphyry deposit formation using zircon U–Pb petrochronology

Simon J. E. Large, Jörn-Frederik Wotzlaw, Marcel Guillong, Albrecht von Quadt, and Christoph A. Heinrich

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (03 Jun 2020) by Daniela Rubatto
AR by Simon Large on behalf of the Authors (03 Jun 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (17 Jun 2020) by Daniela Rubatto
AR by Simon Large on behalf of the Authors (19 Jun 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (30 Jun 2020) by Daniela Rubatto
ED: Publish as is (01 Jul 2020) by Klaus Mezger (Editor)
AR by Simon Large on behalf of the Authors (03 Jul 2020)
Download
Short summary
The integration of zircon geochemistry and U–Pb geochronology (petrochronology) allows us to improve our understanding of magmatic processes. Here we could reconstruct the ~300 kyr evolution of the magma reservoir that sourced the magmas, fluids and metals to form the Batu Hijau porphyry Cu–Au deposit. The application of in situ LA-ICP-MS and high-precision CA–ID–TIMS geochronology to the same zircons further allowed an assessment of the strengths and limitations of the different techniques.