Geochronology
Geochronology
GChron
Articles | Volume 6, issue 4
Articles | Volume 6, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-697-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-697-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 6, issue 4
Research article
 | 
20 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 20 Dec 2024

Interpreting cooling dates and histories from laser ablation in situ (U–Th–Sm) ∕ He thermochronometry: a modelling perspective

Christoph Glotzbach and Todd A. Ehlers

Viewed

Total article views: 2,710 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,762 825 123 2,710 330 120 160
  • HTML: 1,762
  • PDF: 825
  • XML: 123
  • Total: 2,710
  • Supplement: 330
  • BibTeX: 120
  • EndNote: 160
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jun 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,710 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,633 with geography defined and 77 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 25 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
The (U–Th–Sm) / He dating method helps understand the cooling history of rocks. Synthetic modelling experiments were conducted to explore factors affecting in situ vs. whole-grain (U–Th) / He dates. In situ dates are often 30 % older than whole-grain dates, whereas very rapid cooling makes helium loss negligible, resulting in similar whole-grain and in situ dates. In addition, in situ data can reveal cooling histories even from a single grain by measuring helium distributions.
Read more
Share