Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022
Short communication/technical note
 | 
23 Feb 2022
Short communication/technical note |  | 23 Feb 2022

Short communication: Experimental factors affecting fission-track counts in apatite

Carolin Aslanian, Raymond Jonckheere, Bastian Wauschkuhn, and Lothar Ratschbacher

Related authors

On etching, selection and measurement of confined fission tracks in apatite
Raymond Charles Jonckheere
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-13,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-13, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
The closure temperature(s) of zircon Raman dating
Birk Härtel, Raymond Jonckheere, Bastian Wauschkuhn, and Lothar Ratschbacher
Geochronology, 3, 259–272, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-259-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-259-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Fission track
Deconvolution of fission-track length distributions and its application to dating and separating pre- and post-depositional components
Peter Klint Jensen and Kirsten Hansen
Geochronology, 3, 561–575, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-561-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-561-2021, 2021
Short summary
Confined fission-track revelation in apatite: how it works and why it matters
Richard A. Ketcham and Murat T. Tamer
Geochronology, 3, 433–464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-433-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-433-2021, 2021
Short summary
AI-Track-tive: open-source software for automated recognition and counting of surface semi-tracks using computer vision (artificial intelligence)
Simon Nachtergaele and Johan De Grave
Geochronology, 3, 383–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-383-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-383-2021, 2021
Short summary
Thermal annealing of implanted 252Cf fission tracks in monazite
Sean Jones, Andrew Gleadow, and Barry Kohn
Geochronology, 3, 89–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-89-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-89-2021, 2021
Short summary
Technical note: Nikon–TRACKFlow, a new versatile microscope system for fission track analysis
Gerben Van Ranst, Philippe Baert, Ana Clara Fernandes, and Johan De Grave
Geochronology, 2, 93–99, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-93-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-93-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Aslanian, C., Jonckheere, R., Wauschkuhn, B., and Ratschbacher, L.: A quantitative description of fission-track etching in apatite, Am. Mineral., 106, 518–526, 2021. 
Bhandari, N., Bhat, S. G., Lal, D., Rajagopalan, G., Tamhane, A. S. J., and Venkatavaradan, V. S.: Fission fragment tracks in apatite: recordable track lengths, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 13, 191–199, 1971. 
Dakowski, M.: Length distributions of fission tracks in thick crystals, Nuclear Track Detection, 2, 181–189, 1978. 
Donelick, R. A., Ketcham, R. A., and Carlson, W. D.: Variability of apatite fission-track annealing kinetics: II. Crystallographic orientation effects, Am. Mineral., 84, 1224–1234, 1999. 
Enkelmann, E., Jonckheere, R., and Wauschkuhn, B.: Independent fission-track ages (ϕ-ages) of proposed and accepted apatite age standards and a comparison of ϕ-, Z-, ζ- and ζ0-ages: Implications for method calibration, Chem. Geol., 222, 232–248, 2005. 
Download
Short summary
Fission tracks are damage trails from uranium fission in minerals, whose ages and thermal histories are deduced from their number and length. A mineral is etched for observing the tracks with a microscope. We show that the etching and observation conditions affect the track count and explain it in the framework of a recent etch model. We conclude that established solutions do not secure that the ages and thermal histories inferred from track counts and measurements are accurate.