Articles | Volume 5, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023
Short communication/technical note
 | 
19 Jul 2023
Short communication/technical note |  | 19 Jul 2023

Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis

Pieter Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, Jae Schwanethal, and Yannick Buret

Related authors

Broken 206Pb/238U carbonate chronometers and 207Pb/235U fixes
Pieter Vermeesch, Noah McLean, Anton Vaks, Tzahi Golan, Sebastian F. M. Breitenbach, and Randall Parris
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-432,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-432, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geochronology (GChron).
Short summary
Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 6, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
Origin of Great Unconformity Obscured by Thermochronometric Uncertainty
Matthew Fox, Adam G. G. Smith, Pieter Vermeesch, Kerry Gallagher, and Andrew Carter
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23, 2022
Publication in GChron not foreseen
Short summary
An algorithm for U–Pb geochronology by secondary ion mass spectrometry
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 4, 561–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-561-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-561-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Helium diffusion systems
Technical note: An analytical approach for (U–Th) ∕ He dating of goethite by sample encapsulation in quartz ampoules under vacuum, with an example from the Amerasian Basin, Arctic Ocean
Olga Valentinovna Yakubovich, Natalia Pavlovna Konstantinova, Maria Olegovna Anosova, Mary Markovna Podolskaya, and Elena Valerevna Adamskaya
Geochronology, 6, 653–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-653-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-653-2024, 2024
Short summary
U and Th zonation in apatite observed by synchrotron X-ray fluorescence tomography and implications for the (U–Th) ∕ He system
Francis J. Sousa, Stephen E. Cox, E. Troy Rasbury, Sidney R. Hemming, Antonio Lanzirotti, and Matthew Newville
Geochronology, 6, 553–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-553-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-553-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Geometric Correction Method for zircon (U–Th) ∕ He chronology: correcting systematic error and assigning uncertainties to alpha-ejection corrections and eU concentrations
Spencer D. Zeigler, Morgan Baker, James R. Metcalf, and Rebecca M. Flowers
Geochronology, 6, 199–226, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-199-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-199-2024, 2024
Short summary
A practical method for assigning uncertainty and improving the accuracy of alpha-ejection corrections and eU concentrations in apatite (U–Th) ∕ He chronology
Spencer D. Zeigler, James R. Metcalf, and Rebecca M. Flowers
Geochronology, 5, 197–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-197-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cosmogenic 3He paleothermometry on post-LGM glacial bedrock within the central European Alps
Natacha Gribenski, Marissa M. Tremblay, Pierre G. Valla, Greg Balco, Benny Guralnik, and David L. Shuster
Geochronology, 4, 641–663, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-641-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-641-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Boyce, J. W., Hodges, K. V., Olszewski, W. J., Jercinovic, M. J., Carpenter, B. D., and Reiners, P. W.: Laser microprobe (U-Th)/He geochronology, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 70, 3031–3039, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.03.019, 2006. a, b
Boyce, J. W., Hodges, K. V., King, D., Crowley, J. L., Jercinovic, M., Chatterjee, N., Bowring, S. A., and Searle, M.: Improved confidence in (U-Th) / He thermochronology using the laser microprobe: An example from a Pleistocene leucogranite, Nanga Parbat, Pakistan, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 10, Q0AA01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002497, 2009. a
Brennan, C. J., Stockli, D. F., and Patterson, D. B.: Zircon 4He/3He fractional loss step-heating and characterization of parent nuclide distribution, Chem. Geol., 549, 119692, https://doi.org/10.106/j.chemgeo.2020.119692, 2020. a
Colleps, C., van der Beek, P., Denker, A., Amalberti, J., Dittwald, A., Bundesmann, J., and Bernard, M.: Improving the Efficiency of Proton Irradiations for 4He /3He Thermochronology, AGU Fall Meeting 12–16 December 2022, Chicago, IL, USA, 2022AGUFMEP22E1381C, EP22E–1381, 2022. a
Danišík, M., McInnes, B. I., Kirkland, C. L., McDonald, B. J., Evans, N. J., and Becker, T.: Seeing is believing: Visualization of He distribution in zircon and implications for thermal history reconstruction on single crystals, Sci. Adv., 3, e1601121, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601121, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
The U–Th–He method is a technique to determine the cooling history of minerals. Traditional approaches to U–Th–He dating are time-consuming and require handling strong acids and radioactive solutions. This paper presents an alternative approach in which samples are irradiated with protons and subsequently analysed by laser ablation mass spectrometry. Unlike previous in situ U–Th–He dating attempts, the new method does not require any absolute concentration measurements of U, Th, or He.
Share