Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-169-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-169-2020
Short communication/technical note
 | 
02 Jul 2020
Short communication/technical note |  | 02 Jul 2020

Technical note: A prototype transparent-middle-layer data management and analysis infrastructure for cosmogenic-nuclide exposure dating

Greg Balco

Related authors

Technical note: 21Ne in the CoQtz-N quartz standard material
Greg Balco
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-149,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-149, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geochronology (GChron).
Short summary
Assessing the suitability of sites near Pine Island Glacier for subglacial bedrock drilling aimed at detecting Holocene retreat–readvance
Joanne S. Johnson, John Woodward, Ian Nesbitt, Kate Winter, Seth Campbell, Keir A. Nichols, Ryan A. Venturelli, Scott Braddock, Brent M. Goehring, Brenda Hall, Dylan H. Rood, and Greg Balco
The Cryosphere, 19, 303–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-303-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-303-2025, 2025
Short summary
East Antarctic Ice Sheet variability in the central Transantarctic Mountains since the mid Miocene
Gordon R. M. Bromley, Greg Balco, Margaret S. Jackson, Allie Balter-Kennedy, and Holly Thomas
Clim. Past, 21, 145–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-145-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-145-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cosmogenic 21Ne exposure ages on late Pleistocene moraines in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, USA
Joseph P. Tulenko, Greg Balco, Michael A. Clynne, and L. J. Patrick Muffler
Geochronology, 6, 639–652, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-639-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-639-2024, 2024
Short summary
Krypton-85 chronometry of spent nuclear fuel
Greg Balco, Andrew J. Conant, Dallas D. Reilly, Dallin Barton, Chelsea D. Willett, and Brett H. Isselhardt
Geochronology, 6, 571–584, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-571-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-571-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Cosmogenic nuclide dating
Cosmogenic 21Ne exposure ages on late Pleistocene moraines in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, USA
Joseph P. Tulenko, Greg Balco, Michael A. Clynne, and L. J. Patrick Muffler
Geochronology, 6, 639–652, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-639-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-639-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short communication: Updated CRN Denudation datasets in OCTOPUS v2.3
Alexandru T. Codilean and Henry Munack
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-28,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-28, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for GChron
Short summary
Technical note: Altitude scaling of 36Cl production from Fe
Angus K. Moore and Darryl E. Granger
Geochronology, 6, 541–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-541-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-541-2024, 2024
Short summary
Terrestrial Cosmogenic Nuclide depth profiles used to infer changes in Holocene glacier cover, Vintage Peak, Southern Coast Mountains, British Columbia
Adam C. Hawkins, Brent M. Goehring, and Brian Menounos
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2900,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2900, 2024
Short summary
Production rate calibration for cosmogenic 10Be in pyroxene by applying a rapid fusion method to 10Be-saturated samples from the Transantarctic Mountains, Antarctica
Marie Bergelin, Greg Balco, Lee B. Corbett, and Paul R. Bierman
Geochronology, 6, 491–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-491-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-491-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Balco, G.: Contributions and unrealized potential contributions of cosmogenic-nuclide exposure dating to glacier chronology, 1990–2010, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 3–27, 2011. a, b
Balco, G.: Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced 10Be and 26Al benchmarked against geological calibration data, Quat. Geochronol., 39, 150–173, 2017. a
Balco, G.: Glacier Change and Paleoclimate Applications of Cosmogenic-Nuclide Exposure Dating, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 48, 21–48, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-081619-052609, 2020. a, b
Balco, G., Stone, J., Lifton, N., and Dunai, T.: A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements, Quat. Geochronol., 3, 174–195, 2008. a, b, c
Blisniuk, K., Rockwell, T., Owen, L. A., Oskin, M., Lippincott, C., Caffee, M. W., and Dortch, J.: Late Quaternary slip rate gradient defined using high-resolution topography and 10Be dating of offset landforms on the southern San Jacinto fault zone, California, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, B08401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006346, 2010. a
Download
Short summary
Geologic dating methods generally do not directly measure ages. Instead, interpreting a geochemical measurement as an age requires a middle layer of calculations and supporting data, and the fact that this layer continually improves is an obstacle to synoptic analysis of geochronological data. This paper describes a prototype data management and analysis system that addresses this obstacle by making the middle-layer calculations transparent and dynamic to the user.