Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-269-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-269-2022
Research article
 | 
18 May 2022
Research article |  | 18 May 2022

Improving age–depth relationships by using the LANDO (“Linked age and depth modeling”) model ensemble

Gregor Pfalz, Bernhard Diekmann, Johann-Christoph Freytag, Liudmila Syrykh, Dmitry A. Subetto, and Boris K. Biskaborn

Related authors

Diatom responses and geochemical feedbacks to environmental changes at Lake Rauchuagytgyn (Far East Russian Arctic)
Boris K. Biskaborn, Amy Forster, Gregor Pfalz, Lyudmila A. Pestryakova, Kathleen Stoof-Leichsenring, Jens Strauss, Tim Kröger, and Ulrike Herzschuh
Biogeosciences, 20, 1691–1712, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1691-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1691-2023, 2023
Short summary
Sediment and carbon accumulation in a glacial lake in Chukotka (Arctic Siberia) during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene: combining hydroacoustic profiling and down-core analyses
Stuart A. Vyse, Ulrike Herzschuh, Gregor Pfalz, Lyudmila A. Pestryakova, Bernhard Diekmann, Norbert Nowaczyk, and Boris K. Biskaborn
Biogeosciences, 18, 4791–4816, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4791-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4791-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
Minimizing the effects of Pb loss in detrital and igneous U–Pb zircon geochronology by CA-LA-ICP-MS
Erin E. Donaghy, Michael P. Eddy, Federico Moreno, and Mauricio Ibañez-Mejia
Geochronology, 6, 89–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-89-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-89-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling apparent Pb loss in zircon U–Pb geochronology
Glenn R. Sharman and Matthew A. Malkowski
Geochronology, 6, 37–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-37-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-37-2024, 2024
Short summary
Calibration methods for laser ablation Rb–Sr geochronology: comparisons and recommendation based on NIST glass and natural reference materials
Stijn Glorie, Sarah E. Gilbert, Martin Hand, and Jarred C. Lloyd
Geochronology, 6, 21–36, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
ChronoLorica: introduction of a soil–landscape evolution model combined with geochronometers
W. Marijn van der Meij, Arnaud J. A. M. Temme, Steven A. Binnie, and Tony Reimann
Geochronology, 5, 241–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-241-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P., Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X.: TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning, in: 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), 2–4 November 2016, Savannah, GA, USA, 265–283, https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(83)01039-3, 2016. 
Abbott, M. B. and Stafford, T. W.: Radiocarbon geochemistry of modern and Ancient Arctic lake systems, Baffin Island, Canada, Quat. Res., 45, 300–311, https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1996.0031, 1996. 
Alasadi, S. A. and Bhaya, W. S.: Review of data preprocessing techniques in data mining, J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 12, 4102–4107​​​​​​​, 2017. 
Anderson, P., Minyuk, P., Lozhkin, A., Cherepanova, M., Borkhodoev, V., and Finney, B.: A multiproxy record of Holocene environmental changes from the northern Kuril Islands (Russian Far East), J. Paleolimnol., 54, 379–393, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-015-9858-y, 2015. 
Anderson, P. M. and Lozhkin, A. V.: Late Quaternary vegetation of Chukotka (Northeast Russia), implications for Glacial and Holocene environments of Beringia, Quat. Sci. Rev., 107, 112–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.016, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
We use age–depth modeling systems to understand the relationship between age and depth in lake sediment cores. However, depending on which modeling system we use, the model results may vary. We provide a tool to link different modeling systems in an interactive computational environment and make their results comparable. We demonstrate the power of our tool by highlighting three case studies in which we test our application for single-sediment cores and a collection of multiple sediment cores.