Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-119-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-119-2020
Research article
 | 
11 May 2020
Research article |  | 11 May 2020

Unifying the U–Pb and Th–Pb methods: joint isochron regression and common Pb correction

Pieter Vermeesch

Related authors

Broken 206Pb/238U carbonate chronometers and 207Pb/235U fixes
Pieter Vermeesch, Noah McLean, Anton Vaks, Tzahi Golan, Sebastian F. M. Breitenbach, and Randall Parris
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-432,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-432, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geochronology (GChron).
Short summary
Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 6, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis
Pieter Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, Jae Schwanethal, and Yannick Buret
Geochronology, 5, 323–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
Origin of Great Unconformity Obscured by Thermochronometric Uncertainty
Matthew Fox, Adam G. G. Smith, Pieter Vermeesch, Kerry Gallagher, and Andrew Carter
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23, 2022
Publication in GChron not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
Interpreting cooling dates and histories from laser ablation in situ (U–Th–Sm) ∕ He thermochronometry: a modelling perspective
Christoph Glotzbach and Todd A. Ehlers
Geochronology, 6, 697–717, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-697-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-697-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short communication: Nanoscale heterogeneity of U and Pb in baddeleyite from atom probe tomography – 238U series alpha recoil effects and U atom clustering
Steven Denyszyn, Donald W. Davis, and Denis Fougerouse
Geochronology, 6, 607–619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-607-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-607-2024, 2024
Short summary
In situ rubidium–strontium geochronology of white mica in young metamafic and metasomatic rocks from Syros: testing the limits of laser-ablation triple-quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer mica dating using different anchoring approaches
Jesús Muñoz-Montecinos, Andrea Giuliani, Senan Oesch, Silvia Volante, Bradley Peters, and Whitney Behr
Geochronology, 6, 585–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-585-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-585-2024, 2024
Short summary
An optimization tool for identifying multiple-diffusion domain model parameters
Andrew L. Gorin, Joshua M. Gorin, Marie Bergelin, and David L. Shuster
Geochronology, 6, 521–540, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-521-2024, 2024
Short summary
A statistical analysis of zircon age distributions in volcanic, porphyry and plutonic rocks
Chetan Nathwani, Dawid Szymanowski, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Sava Markovic, Adrianna L. Virmond, and Cyril Chelle-Michou
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-25,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-25, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GChron
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersen, T.: Correction of common lead in U–Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb, Chem. Geol., 192, 59–79, 2002. a, b, c
Chew, D. M., Sylvester, P. J., and Tubrett, M. N.: U–Pb and Th–Pb dating of apatite by LA-ICPMS, Chem. Geol., 280, 200–216, 2011. a, b, c
Galbraith, R. F.: Statistics for fission track analysis, CRC Press, 2005. a
Gibson, R., Godin, L., Kellett, D. A., Cottle, J. M., and Archibald, D.: Diachronous deformation along the base of the Himalayan metamorphic core, west-central Nepal, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 128, 860–878, 2016. a, b, c, d
Janots, E. and Rubatto, D.: U–Th–Pb dating of collision in the external Alpine domains (Urseren zone, Switzerland) using low temperature allanite and monazite, Lithos, 184, 155–166, 2014.  a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Download
Short summary
The U–Pb method is one of the most powerful and versatile methods in the geochronological toolbox. With two isotopes of uranium decaying to two different isotopes of lead, the U–Pb method offers an internal quality control that is absent from most other geochronological techniques. U-bearing minerals often contain significant amounts of Th, which decays to a third Pb isotope. This paper presents an algorithm to jointly process all three chronometers at once.
Share