Articles | Volume 6, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Calibration methods for laser ablation Rb–Sr geochronology: comparisons and recommendation based on NIST glass and natural reference materials
Stijn Glorie
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Sarah E. Gilbert
Adelaide Microscopy, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Martin Hand
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Jarred C. Lloyd
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Related authors
Sarah E. Gilbert, Stijn Glorie, and Jarred C. Lloyd
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2790, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2790, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents new methodology for combined in-situ analysis of Rb-Sr and K-Ca in K-rich micas and feldspars. Simultaneous analysis is especially beneficial for small grains and/or detrital minerals where sample material is limited. This technique has the potential for identifying decoupling between the isotope systems, to further understanding of cooling and alteration processes in micas and feldspars, and increase knowledge of element diffusivity in these minerals.
Alexander T. De Vries Van Leeuwen, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Jacob Mulder, and Sarah E. Gilbert
Geochronology, 7, 199–211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-199-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this contribution, we demonstrate in situ monazite lutetium–hafnium dating and compare results with uranium–lead dating. We present data from monazite reference materials and complex samples to demonstrate the viability of this method. We show that in situ lutetium–hafnium dating of monazite can resolve multiple age populations and may find use in scenarios where the uranium–lead system has been compromised.
Jon Engström, Kathryn Cutts, Stijn Glorie, Esa Heilimo, Ester M. Jolis, and Radoslaw M. Michallik
Solid Earth, 16, 97–117, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-97-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-97-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes migmatites and associated rocks in SW Finland that have been studied using the new in situ garnet and apatite Lu–Hf geochronology method. The metamorphic constraints and age presented in this paper enhance our understanding of the geological evolution in SW Finland. The results reveal detailed temporal constraints for the tectonic evolution that can be linked to major events in adjacent tectonic blocks in both Finland and Sweden during the Svecofennian orogeny.
Krisztián Szentpéteri, Kathryn Cutts, Stijn Glorie, Hugh O'Brien, Sari Lukkari, Radoslaw M. Michallik, and Alan Butcher
Eur. J. Mineral., 36, 433–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-433-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In situ Lu–Hf geochronology of garnet is applied to date a Finnish lithium–caesium–tantalum (LCT) pegmatite from the Somero–Tammela pegmatite region. The age obtained was 1801 ± 53 Ma, which is consistent with zircon ages of 1815–1740 Ma obtained from the same pegmatite. We show the in situ Lu–Hf method is a fast way of obtaining reliable age dates from LCT pegmatites.
Alexander Simpson, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Carl Spandler, Sarah Gilbert, and Brad Cave
Geochronology, 4, 353–372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The article demonstrates a new technique that can be used to determine the age of calcite crystallisation using the decay of 176Lu to 176Hf. The technique is novel because (a) Lu–Hf radiometric dating is rarely applied to calcite and (b) this is the first instance where analysis has been conducted by ablating the sample with a laser beam rather than bulk dissolution. By using laser ablation the original context of the sample is preserved.
Sarah E. Gilbert, Stijn Glorie, and Jarred C. Lloyd
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2790, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2790, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents new methodology for combined in-situ analysis of Rb-Sr and K-Ca in K-rich micas and feldspars. Simultaneous analysis is especially beneficial for small grains and/or detrital minerals where sample material is limited. This technique has the potential for identifying decoupling between the isotope systems, to further understanding of cooling and alteration processes in micas and feldspars, and increase knowledge of element diffusivity in these minerals.
Jarred C. Lloyd, Carl Spandler, Sarah E. Gilbert, and Derrick Hasterok
Geochronology, 7, 265–287, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-265-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Laser-based dating of rocks and minerals is invaluable in geoscience. This study significantly advances our ability to model and correct for a process called down-hole fractionation (DHF) that impacts the accuracy and uncertainty of dates. We develop an algorithm that quantitatively models DHF patterns but can be used on other geoscientific data. The implications are far-reaching: improved accuracy, reduced uncertainty, and easier comparisons between different samples and laboratories.
Alexander T. De Vries Van Leeuwen, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Jacob Mulder, and Sarah E. Gilbert
Geochronology, 7, 199–211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-199-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-7-199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this contribution, we demonstrate in situ monazite lutetium–hafnium dating and compare results with uranium–lead dating. We present data from monazite reference materials and complex samples to demonstrate the viability of this method. We show that in situ lutetium–hafnium dating of monazite can resolve multiple age populations and may find use in scenarios where the uranium–lead system has been compromised.
Jon Engström, Kathryn Cutts, Stijn Glorie, Esa Heilimo, Ester M. Jolis, and Radoslaw M. Michallik
Solid Earth, 16, 97–117, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-97-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-97-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes migmatites and associated rocks in SW Finland that have been studied using the new in situ garnet and apatite Lu–Hf geochronology method. The metamorphic constraints and age presented in this paper enhance our understanding of the geological evolution in SW Finland. The results reveal detailed temporal constraints for the tectonic evolution that can be linked to major events in adjacent tectonic blocks in both Finland and Sweden during the Svecofennian orogeny.
Krisztián Szentpéteri, Kathryn Cutts, Stijn Glorie, Hugh O'Brien, Sari Lukkari, Radoslaw M. Michallik, and Alan Butcher
Eur. J. Mineral., 36, 433–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-433-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In situ Lu–Hf geochronology of garnet is applied to date a Finnish lithium–caesium–tantalum (LCT) pegmatite from the Somero–Tammela pegmatite region. The age obtained was 1801 ± 53 Ma, which is consistent with zircon ages of 1815–1740 Ma obtained from the same pegmatite. We show the in situ Lu–Hf method is a fast way of obtaining reliable age dates from LCT pegmatites.
Darwinaji Subarkah, Angus L. Nixon, Monica Jimenez, Alan S. Collins, Morgan L. Blades, Juraj Farkaš, Sarah E. Gilbert, Simon Holford, and Amber Jarrett
Geochronology, 4, 577–600, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-577-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Advancements in technology have introduced new techniques to more quickly and cheaply date rocks with little sample preparation. A unique use of this method is to date shales and constrain when these rocks were first deposited. This approach can also time when such sequences were subsequently affected by heat or fluids after they were deposited. This is useful, as the formation of precious-metal-bearing systems or petroleum source rocks is commonly associated with such processes.
Alexander Simpson, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Carl Spandler, Sarah Gilbert, and Brad Cave
Geochronology, 4, 353–372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The article demonstrates a new technique that can be used to determine the age of calcite crystallisation using the decay of 176Lu to 176Hf. The technique is novel because (a) Lu–Hf radiometric dating is rarely applied to calcite and (b) this is the first instance where analysis has been conducted by ablating the sample with a laser beam rather than bulk dissolution. By using laser ablation the original context of the sample is preserved.
Cited articles
Balcaen, L., Bolea-Fernandez, E., Resano, M., and Vanhaecke, F.: Inductively coupled plasma – Tandem mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS): A powerful and universal tool for the interference-free determination of (ultra)trace elements – A tutorial review, Anal. Chim. Acta, 894, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.08.053, 2015.
Black, L.: SHRIMP U–Pb zircon ages obtained during 2006/07 for NSW Geological Survey projects, Geological Survey of New South Wales, Report GS2007/2298, 2007.
Burtt, A. C. and Abbot, P. J.: The Taratap Granodioritite, South-East South Australia, MESA Journal, 10, 35–39, 1998.
Flood, R. H. and Shaw, S. E.: A cordierite-bearing granite suite from the New England Batholith, N.S.W., Australia, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 52, 157–164, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00457291, 1975.
Flood, R. H. and Shaw, S. E.: Two “S-type” granite suites with low initial ratios from the New England Batholith, Australia, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 61, 163–173, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374365, 1977.
Glorie, S., Gilbert, S., Hand, M., and Lloyd, J.: Rb–Sr dataset, FigShare [data set], https://doi.org/10.25909/23996484, 2023.
Glorie, S., Hand, M., Mulder, J., Simpson, A., Emo Robert, B., Kamber, B., Fernie, N., Nixon, A., and Gilbert, S.: Robust laser ablation Lu–Hf dating of apatite: an empirical evaluation, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 537, 165–184, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP537-2022-205, 2024.
Gorojovsky, L. and Alard, O.: Optimisation of laser and mass spectrometer parameters for thein situanalysis of ratios by LA-ICP-MS/MS, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 35, 2322–2336, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00308e, 2020.
Hensel, H. D., McCulloch, M. T., and Chappell, B. W.: The New England Batholith: constraints on its derivation from Nd and Sr isotopic studies of granitoids and country rocks Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 49, 369–384, 1985.
Hogmalm, K. J., Zack, T., Karlsson, A. K. O., Sjoqvist, A. S. L., and Garbe-Schonberg, D.: In situ Rb-Sr and K-Ca dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: an evaluation of N2O and SF6 as reaction gases, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 32, 305–313, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ja00362a, 2017.
Jackson, S. E. and Günther, D.: The nature and sources of laser induced isotopic fractionation in laser ablation-multicollector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 18, 205–212, https://doi.org/10.1039/B209620J, 2003.
Jegal, Y., Zimmermann, C., Reisberg, L., Yeghicheyan, D., Cloquet, C., Peiffert, C., Gerardin, M., Deloule, E., and Mercadier, J.: Characterisation of Reference Materials for In Situ Rb-Sr Dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 46, 645–671, https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12456, 2022.
Jeon, H., Williams, I. S., and Chappell, B. W.: Magma to mud to magma: Rapid crustal recycling by Permian granite magmatism near the eastern Gondwana margin, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 319–320, 104–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.010, 2012.
Kirkland, C. L., Olierook, H. K. H., Danišík, M., Liebmann, J., Hollis, J., Ribeiro, B. V., and Rankenburg, K.: Dating mylonitic overprinting of ancient rocks, Communications Earth & Environment, 4, 47, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00709-5, 2023.
Košler, J., Wiedenbeck, M., Wirth, R., Hovorka, J., Sylvester, P., and Míková, J.: Chemical and phase composition of particles produced by laser ablation of silicate glass and zircon – implications for elemental fractionation during ICP-MS analysis, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 20, 402–409, https://doi.org/10.1039/B416269B, 2005.
Larson, K. P., Button, M., Shrestha, S., and Camacho, A.: A comparison of and dates: Evaluating the problem of excess 40Ar in Himalayan mica, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 609, 118058, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118058, 2023.
Laureijs, C. T., Coogan, L. A., and Spence, J.: In-situ Rb-Sr dating of celadonite from altered upper oceanic crust using laser ablation ICP-MS/MS, Chem. Geol., 579, 120339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120339, 2021.
Li, S.-S., Santosh, M., Farkaš, J., Redaa, A., Ganguly, S., Kim, S. W., Zhang, C., Gilbert, S., and Zack, T.: Coupled U-Pb and Rb-Sr laser ablation geochronology trace Archean to Proterozoic crustal evolution in the Dharwar Craton, India, Precambrian Res., 343, 105709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105709, 2020.
Li, Y. and Vermeesch, P.: Short communication: Inverse isochron regression for Re–Os, K–Ca and other chronometers, Geochronology, 3, 415–420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-415-2021, 2021.
Liebmann, J., Kirkland, C. L., Kelsey, D. E., Korhonen, F. J., and Rankenburg, K.: Lithological fabric as a proxy for Rb-Sr isotopic complexity, Chem. Geol., 608, 121041, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121041, 2022.
Longerich, H. P., Günther, D., and Jackson, S. E.: Elemental fractionation in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Fresen. J. Anal. Chem., 355, 538–542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s0021663550538, 1996.
Moens, L. J., Vanhaecke, F. F., Bandura, D. R., Baranov, V. I., and Tanner, S. D.: Elimination of isobaric interferences in ICP-MS, using ion–molecule reaction chemistry: age determination of magmatic rocks, a case study, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 16, 991–994, https://doi.org/10.1039/B103707M, 2001.
Mortimer, G. E., Cooper, J. A., and James, P. R.: U-Pb and Rb-Sr geochronology and geological evolution of the Harts Range ruby mine area of the Arunta Inlier, central Australia, Lithos, 20, 445–467, https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4937(87)90029-6, 1987.
Norris, A. and Danyushevsky, L.: Towards Estimating the Complete Uncertainty Budget of Quantified Results Measured By LA-ICP-MS, Goldschmidt, Boston, USA, 2018.
Olierook, H. K. H., Rankenburg, K., Ulrich, S., Kirkland, C. L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S., McInnes, B. I. A., Prent, A., Gillespie, J., McDonald, B., and Darragh, M.: Resolving multiple geological events using in situ Rb–Sr geochronology: implications for metallogenesis at Tropicana, Western Australia, Geochronology, 2, 283–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-283-2020, 2020.
Phillips, G., Landenberger, B., and Belousova, E. A.: Building the New England Batholith, eastern Australia – Linking granite petrogenesis with geodynamic setting using Hf isotopes in zircon, Lithos, 122, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.11.005, 2011.
Redaa, A., Farkas, J., Gilbert, S., Collins, A. S., Wade, B., Lohr, S., Zack, T., and Garbe-Schonberg, D.: Assessment of elemental fractionation and matrix effects during in situ Rb-Sr dating of phlogopite by LA-ICP-MS/MS: implications for the accuracy and precision of mineral ages, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 36, 322–344, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00299b, 2021.
Redaa, A., Farkaš, J., Gilbert, S., Collins, A. S., Löhr, S., Vasegh, D., Forster, M., Blades, M., Zack, T., Giuliani, A., Maas, R., Baldermann, A., Dietzel, M., and Garbe-Schönberg, D.: Testing Nano-Powder and Fused-Glass Mineral Reference Materials for In Situ Rb-Sr Dating of Glauconite, Phlogopite, Biotite and Feldspar via LA-ICP-MS/MS, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 47, 23–48, https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12467, 2023.
Roberts, N. M. W., Rasbury, E. T., Parrish, R. R., Smith, C. J., Horstwood, M. S. A., and Condon, D. J.: A calcite reference material for LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 18, 2807–2814, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006784, 2017.
Rösel, D. and Zack, T.: LA-ICP-MS/MS Single-Spot Rb-Sr Dating, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 46, 143–168, https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12414, 2022.
Rosenbaum, G., Li, P., and Rubatto, D.: The contorted New England Orogen (eastern Australia): New evidence from U-Pb geochronology of early Permian granitoids, Tectonics, 31, TC1006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC002960, 2012.
Sengun, F., Erlandsson, V. B., Hogmalm, J., and Zack, T.: In situ Rb-Sr dating of K-bearing minerals from the orogenic Akcaabat gold deposit in the Menderes Massif, Western Anatolia, Turkey, J. Asian Earth Sci., 185, 104048, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104048, 2019.
Shaw, S. E. and Flood, R. H.: The New England Batholith, eastern Australia: Geochemical variations in time and space, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 86, 10530–10544, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086iB11p10530, 1981.
Simpson, A., Glorie, S., Hand, M., Spandler, C., Gilbert, S., and Cave, B.: In situ Lu–Hf geochronology of calcite, Geochronology, 4, 353–372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, 2022.
Tillberg, M., Drake, H., Zack, T., Kooijman, E., Whitehouse, M. J., and Astrom, M. E.: In situ Rb-Sr dating of slickenfibres in deep crystalline basement faults, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 562, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57262-5, 2020.
Tillberg, M., Drake, H., Zack, T., Hogmalm, J., Kooijman, E., and Astrom, M.: Reconstructing craton-scale tectonic events via in situ Rb-Sr geochronology of poly-phased vein mineralization, Terra Nova, 33, 502–510, https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12542, 2021.
Vermeesch, P.: IsoplotR: A free and open toolbox for geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001, 2018.
Villa, I. M., De Bièvre, P., Holden, N. E., and Renne, P. R.: IUPAC-IUGS recommendation on the half life of 87Rb, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 382–385, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.025, 2015.
Wang, C. Y., Alard, O., Lai, Y. J., Foley, S. F., Liu, Y. S., Munnikhuis, J., and Wang, Y.: Advances in in-situ Rb-Sr dating using LA-ICP-MS/MS: applications to igneous rocks of all ages and to the identification of unrecognized metamorphic events, Chem. Geol., 610, 121073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121073, 2022.
Woodhead, J. D. and Hergt, J. M.: Strontium, Neodymium and Lead Isotope Analyses of NIST Glass Certified Reference Materials: SRM 610, 612, 614, Geostandard. Newslett., 25, 261–266, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2001.tb00601.x, 2001.
Zack, T. and Hogmalm, K. J.: Laser ablation dating by online chemical separation of Rb and Sr in an oxygen-filled reaction cell, Chem. Geol., 437, 120–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.027, 2016.
Short summary
Radiometric dating methods, involving laser ablation as the sample introduction, require robust calibrations to reference materials with similar ablation properties to the analysed samples. In the case of the rubidium–strontium dating method, calibrations are often conducted to nano powder with different ablation characteristics than the crystalline minerals. We describe the limitations of this approach and recommend an alternative calibration method involving natural minerals.
Radiometric dating methods, involving laser ablation as the sample introduction, require robust...