Articles | Volume 6, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024
Research article
 | 
17 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 17 Jan 2024

Calibration methods for laser ablation Rb–Sr geochronology: comparisons and recommendation based on NIST glass and natural reference materials

Stijn Glorie, Sarah E. Gilbert, Martin Hand, and Jarred C. Lloyd

Related authors

In situ Lu–Hf geochronology of calcite
Alexander Simpson, Stijn Glorie, Martin Hand, Carl Spandler, Sarah Gilbert, and Brad Cave
Geochronology, 4, 353–372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-353-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
ChronoLorica: introduction of a soil–landscape evolution model combined with geochronometers
W. Marijn van der Meij, Arnaud J. A. M. Temme, Steven A. Binnie, and Tony Reimann
Geochronology, 5, 241–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-241-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modeling apparent Pb loss in zircon U-Pb geochronology
Glenn R. Sharman and Matthew A. Malkowski
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-6, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GChron
Short summary
Technical note: colab_zirc_dims: a Google Colab-compatible toolset for automated and semi-automated measurement of mineral grains in laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry images using deep learning models
Michael C. Sitar and Ryan J. Leary
Geochronology, 5, 109–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-109-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-109-2023, 2023
Short summary
Calculation of uncertainty in the (U–Th) ∕ He system
Peter E. Martin, James R. Metcalf, and Rebecca M. Flowers
Geochronology, 5, 91–107, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-91-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-91-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Balcaen, L., Bolea-Fernandez, E., Resano, M., and Vanhaecke, F.: Inductively coupled plasma – Tandem mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS): A powerful and universal tool for the interference-free determination of (ultra)trace elements – A tutorial review, Anal. Chim. Acta, 894, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.08.053, 2015. 
Black, L.: SHRIMP U–Pb zircon ages obtained during 2006/07 for NSW Geological Survey projects, Geological Survey of New South Wales, Report GS2007/2298, 2007. 
Burtt, A. C. and Abbot, P. J.: The Taratap Granodioritite, South-East South Australia, MESA Journal, 10, 35–39, 1998. 
Flood, R. H. and Shaw, S. E.: A cordierite-bearing granite suite from the New England Batholith, N.S.W., Australia, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 52, 157–164, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00457291, 1975. 
Flood, R. H. and Shaw, S. E.: Two “S-type” granite suites with low initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios from the New England Batholith, Australia, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 61, 163–173, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374365, 1977. 
Download
Short summary
Radiometric dating methods, involving laser ablation as the sample introduction, require robust calibrations to reference materials with similar ablation properties to the analysed samples. In the case of the rubidium–strontium dating method, calibrations are often conducted to nano powder with different ablation characteristics than the crystalline minerals. We describe the limitations of this approach and recommend an alternative calibration method involving natural minerals.