Articles | Volume 3, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-415-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-415-2021
Short communication/technical note
 | 
02 Aug 2021
Short communication/technical note |  | 02 Aug 2021

Short communication: Inverse isochron regression for Re–Os, K–Ca and other chronometers

Yang Li and Pieter Vermeesch

Related authors

Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 6, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis
Pieter Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, Jae Schwanethal, and Yannick Buret
Geochronology, 5, 323–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
Origin of Great Unconformity Obscured by Thermochronometric Uncertainty
Matthew Fox, Adam G. G. Smith, Pieter Vermeesch, Kerry Gallagher, and Andrew Carter
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23, 2022
Publication in GChron not foreseen
Short summary
An algorithm for U–Pb geochronology by secondary ion mass spectrometry
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 4, 561–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-561-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-561-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
Technical note: RA138 calcite U–Pb LA-ICP-MS primary reference material
Marcel Guillong, Elias Samankassou, Inigo A. Müller, Dawid Szymanowski, Nathan Looser, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Óscar Merino-Tomé, Juan R. Bahamonde, Yannick Buret, and Maria Ovtcharova
Geochronology, 6, 465–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-465-2024, 2024
Short summary
Revising chronological uncertainties in marine archives using global anthropogenic signals: a case study on the oceanic 13C Suess effect
Nil Irvalı, Ulysses S. Ninnemann, Are Olsen, Neil L. Rose, David J. R. Thornalley, Tor L. Mjell, and François Counillon
Geochronology, 6, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-449-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-449-2024, 2024
Short summary
The daughter–parent plot: a tool for analyzing thermochronological data
Birk Härtel and Eva Enkelmann
Geochronology, 6, 429–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 6, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short communication: Resolving the discrepancy between U–Pb age estimates for the “Likhall” bed, a key level in the Ordovician timescale
André Navin Paul, Anders Lindskog, and Urs Schaltegger
Geochronology, 6, 325–335, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-325-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-325-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Connelly, J., Bollard, J., and Bizzarro, M.: Pb–Pb chronometry and the early solar system, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 201, 345–363, 2017. a
Dalrymple, G. B., Lanphere, M. A., and Pringle, M. S.: Correlation diagrams in 40Ar/39Ar dating: Is there a correct choice?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 589–591, 1988. a, b
Harrison, T. M., Heizler, M. T., McKeegan, K. D., and Schmitt, A. K.: In situ 40K40Ca 'double-plus' SIMS dating resolves Klokken feldspar 40K40Ar paradox, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 299, 426–433, 2010. a
Kendall, B., Creaser, R. A., and Selby, D.: Re–Os geochronology of postglacial black shales in Australia: Constraints on the timing of “Sturtian” glaciation, Geology, 34, 729–732, 2006. a
Ludwig, K. R.: Calculation of uncertainties of U-Pb isotope data, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 46, 212–220, 1980. a
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
A conventional isochron is a straight-line fit to two sets of isotopic ratios, D/d and P/d, where P is the radioactive parent, D is the radiogenic daughter, and d is a second isotope of the daughter element. The slope of this line is proportional to the age of the system. An inverse isochron is a linear fit through d/D and P/D. The horizontal intercept of this line is inversely proportional to the age. The latter approach is preferred when d<D, which is the case in Re–Os and K–Ca geochronology.