Articles | Volume 6, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-397-2024
Research article
 | 
18 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 18 Jul 2024

Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR

Pieter Vermeesch

Related authors

Broken 206Pb/238U carbonate chronometers and 207Pb/235U fixes
Pieter Vermeesch, Noah McLean, Anton Vaks, Tzahi Golan, Sebastian F. M. Breitenbach, and Randall Parris
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-432,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-432, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geochronology (GChron).
Short summary
Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis
Pieter Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, Jae Schwanethal, and Yannick Buret
Geochronology, 5, 323–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
Origin of Great Unconformity Obscured by Thermochronometric Uncertainty
Matthew Fox, Adam G. G. Smith, Pieter Vermeesch, Kerry Gallagher, and Andrew Carter
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2022-23, 2022
Publication in GChron not foreseen
Short summary
An algorithm for U–Pb geochronology by secondary ion mass spectrometry
Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 4, 561–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-561-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-561-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
Interpreting cooling dates and histories from laser ablation in situ (U–Th–Sm) ∕ He thermochronometry: a modelling perspective
Christoph Glotzbach and Todd A. Ehlers
Geochronology, 6, 697–717, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-697-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-697-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short communication: Nanoscale heterogeneity of U and Pb in baddeleyite from atom probe tomography – 238U series alpha recoil effects and U atom clustering
Steven Denyszyn, Donald W. Davis, and Denis Fougerouse
Geochronology, 6, 607–619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-607-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-607-2024, 2024
Short summary
In situ rubidium–strontium geochronology of white mica in young metamafic and metasomatic rocks from Syros: testing the limits of laser-ablation triple-quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer mica dating using different anchoring approaches
Jesús Muñoz-Montecinos, Andrea Giuliani, Senan Oesch, Silvia Volante, Bradley Peters, and Whitney Behr
Geochronology, 6, 585–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-585-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-585-2024, 2024
Short summary
An optimization tool for identifying multiple-diffusion domain model parameters
Andrew L. Gorin, Joshua M. Gorin, Marie Bergelin, and David L. Shuster
Geochronology, 6, 521–540, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-521-2024, 2024
Short summary
A statistical analysis of zircon age distributions in volcanic, porphyry and plutonic rocks
Chetan Nathwani, Dawid Szymanowski, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Sava Markovic, Adrianna L. Virmond, and Cyril Chelle-Michou
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-25,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2024-25, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GChron
Short summary

Cited articles

Daëron, M. and Vermeesch, P.: Omnivariant generalized least squares regression: Theory, geochronological applications, and making the case for reconciled Δ47 calibrations, Chem. Geol., 647, 121881, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121881, 2023. a
Li, Y. and Vermeesch, P.: Short communication: Inverse isochron regression for Re–Os, K–Ca and other chronometers, Geochronology, 3, 415–420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-415-2021, 2021. a, b
Ludwig, K. R.: On the treatment of concordant uranium-lead ages, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 62, 665–676, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00059-3, 1998. a
Ludwig, K. R.: User's manual for Isoplot 3.75: a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel, Berkeley Geochronology Center, 5, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12744084, 2012. a, b, c
McIntyre, G. A., Brooks, C., Compston, W., and Turek, A.: The Statistical Assessment of Rb-Sr Isochrons, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 5459–5468, 1966. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
The age of some geological materials can be estimated from the ratio of certain radiogenic "daughter" isotopes to their radioactive "parent". However, in many cases, the age estimation process is complicated by the presence of an inherited component of non-radiogenic daughter isotopes. This paper presents an improved algorithm to estimate the radiogenic and non-radiogenic components, either separately or jointly.
Share